Accessibility and Acceptability of the Department of Veteran Affairs Health Care: Diverse Veterans' Perspectives

Veteran Administration Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1656, USA.
Military medicine (Impact Factor: 0.77). 04/2004; 169(3):243-50. DOI: 10.7205/MILMED.169.3.243
Source: PubMed


Diverse veteran's perspectives on the accessibility and acceptability of the Department of Veteran Affairs (VA) health services are presented.
The qualitative methodology uses 16 focus groups (N = 178) stratified by war cohort (World War II and Korean Conflict versus Vietnam War and Persian Gulf War) and four ethnic/racial categories (African American, Asian American, European American, Hispanic American).
Five themes emerged regarding veterans' health care expectations: (1) better information regarding available services, (2) sense of deserved benefits, (3) concern about welfare stigma, (4) importance of physician attentiveness, and (5) staff respect for patients as veterans. Although veterans' ethnic/racial backgrounds differentiated their military experiences, it was the informants' veteran identity that framed what they expected of VA health services.
Accessibility and acceptability of VA health care is related to veterans' perspectives of the nature of their entitlement to service. Provider education and customer service strategies should consider the identified factors to increase access to VA as well as improve veterans' acceptance of the care.

23 Reads
  • Source
    • "Table 1: Strong Families Program Engagement and Treatment Retention Rates Measure n % Treatment completion rates Pilot (n = 9) Treatment completers (eight of eight modules) 9 100.0 Clinical trial treatment arm (n = 57) Treatment completers (seven of eight modules) 53 93.0 Treatment completers (eight of eight modules) 51 89.5 Total (N = 66) Treatment completers (seven of eight modules) 62 93.9 Treatment completers (eight of eight modules) 60 90.9 Clinical trial treatment arm drop-out Withdrawal after home visit 1 2 3.4 No-show rate for home visit 1 2 3.4 populations (Bauer, Williford, McBride, McBride, & Shea, 2005; Damron-Rodriguez et al., 2004 "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: For more than a decade, the long wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have placed tremendous and cumulative strain on U.S. military personnel and their families. The high operational tempo, length, and number of deployments-and greater in-theater exposure to threat-have resulted in well-documented psychological health concerns among service members and veterans. In addition, there is increasing and compelling evidence describing the significant deleterious impact of the deployment cycle on family members, including children, in military-connected families. However, rates of engagement and service utilization in prevention and intervention services continue to lag far below apparent need among service members and their families, because of both practical and psychological barriers. The authors describe the dynamic and ultimately successful process of engaging military families with young children in a home-based reintegration program designed to support parenting and strengthen parent-child relationships as service member parents move back into family life. In addition to the integration of existing evidence-based engagement strategies, the authors applied a strengths-based approach to working with military families and worked from a community-based participatory foundation to enhance family engagement and program completion. Implications for engagement of military personnel and their loved ones are discussed.
    Health & social work 02/2014; 39(1):47-54. DOI:10.1093/hsw/hlu001 · 0.94 Impact Factor
  • Source

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The objectives of this study were to describe the military experiences of Native American veterans and to explore how factors related to veteran identity influence their use of health services. Study participants completed a demographic and health questionnaire, followed by participation in a focus group session. The findings revealed that, despite their negative experiences during military service, most participants had a positive veteran identity. Almost 46% of participants reported having a service-related illness or injury. Almost one-third (28.2%) used the Indian Health Service (IHS) exclusively for their health care, followed by those who used both IHS and Veterans Affairs (VA) services (23.5%), followed by VA-only users (21.2%). We conclude that Native American veterans highly identify with their military service but may turn to IHS for their medical care. The data support the current VA policy of strengthening coordination with the IHS to ensure that the medical needs of Native American veterans are addressed.
    Military medicine 10/2005; 170(9):782-6. DOI:10.7205/MILMED.170.9.782 · 0.77 Impact Factor
Show more

Similar Publications