Do equivalent doses of escitalopram and citalopram have similar efficacy? A pooled analysis of two positive placebo-controlled studies in major depressive disorder.

Kuopion Psykiatripalvelu OY Psychiatric Research, Clinic of Kuopio, Kuopio, Finland.
International Clinical Psychopharmacology (Impact Factor: 3.1). 05/2004; 19(3):149-55. DOI: 10.1097/00004850-200405000-00005
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Escitalopram is the S-enantiomer of citalopram. In this study, we compared the efficacy of equivalent dosages of escitalopram and citalopram in the treatment of moderate to severe major depressive disorder (MDD), based on data from two, pooled, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of escitalopram in which citalopram was the active reference. The primary efficacy parameter was the mean change from baseline in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score. Significant differences in favour of escitalopram were observed for the MADRS [P<0.05, observed cases (OC)/last observation carried forward (LOCF)] and Clinical Global Improvement-Severity of Illness scores (CGI-S; P<0.05, OC/LOCF). Escitalopram separated from placebo at week 1 on the primary efficacy parameter, whereas citalopram first separated from placebo at week 6. An analysis of time to response showed that escitalopram-treated patients responded significantly faster to treatment than citalopram-treated patients (P<0.01). More patients responded to and achieved remission with escitalopram than to citalopram (P<0.05, OC). The HAMD scale was only used in the fixed-dose study, where escitalopram-treated patients had a significant reduction in HAMD-17 total score at week 8 compared to citalopram-treated patients (P<0.05, OC/LOCF). In the pooled subpopulation of severely ill patients (MADRS> or = 30), escitalopram-treated patients showed greater improvement than citalopram-treated patients (P<0.05, LOCF/OC). Escitalopram showed consistently superior efficacy compared to citalopram in the treatment of moderate to severe MDD on all efficacy parameters, and was similarly well tolerated.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Objective: To retrospectively examine the timing of depressive symptom improvement in patients treated with vilazodone, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) and 5-HT1A partial agonist. Research design and methods: Post hoc analyses were conducted on pooled data from 2 Phase III, multicenter, 8-week, double-blind, randomized, controlled, trials (RCTs) of vilazodone 40 mg/day or placebo in adult patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Clinical trial registration: Randomized controlled trial 1: identifier: NCT00285376,; randomized controlled trial 2: identifier: NCT00683592, http:// Main outcome measures: Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score least squares (LS) mean change from baseline to Week 8; MADRS single items LS mean change from baseline; MADRS responder analyses: response = ≥50% reduction in baseline score; cumulative response = proportion of patients at each assessment who achieved response that was sustained at all subsequent weeks; sustained response = ≥50% reduction in baseline MADRS total score at last 2 visits; and sustained response plus MADRS score ≤12 at the last 2 visits of the study. Results: LS mean difference (LSMD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for change from baseline to Week 8 was significantly greater in favor of vilazodone versus placebo (-2.8 [-4.1 to -1.4]; p<0.0001); differences between vilazodone and placebo were statistically significant beginning at Week 1. Early improvement in depressive symptoms was suggested by statistically significant separation from placebo on 7 of 10 MADRS single items early as Week 1 or Week 2. A significantly greater proportion of vilazodone patients achieved response using all responder criteria, with early and sustained improvement consistently observed. Conclusions: Early and sustained improvement of depressive symptoms was retrospectively observed in patients treated with vilazodone; early findings may be related to overall treatment outcomes.
    Current Medical Research and Opinion 10/2013; · 2.37 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It is known that newer antidepressants, such as the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), provide advantages in tolerability over antidepressants such as the tricyclics. However, even within the SSRI class, differences in efficacy or tolerability exist between the individual drugs. Among the three most widely prescribed SSRIs are paroxetine, sertraline, and escitalopram. Escitalopram is commonly referred to as an SSRI, but also has well-documented allosteric properties, and thus can be further classed as an allosteric serotonin reuptake inhibitor. All three antidepressants are efficacious compared with placebo, but there is evidence that escitalopram is more effective than a range of other antidepressants. There are no direct data to regard either paroxetine or sertraline as a superior antidepressant. Escitalopram is superior compared with paroxetine, which has a less favorable tolerability profile. Paroxetine is associated with cholinergic muscarinic antagonism and potent inhibition of CYP2D6, and sertraline has moderate drug interaction issues in comparison with escitalopram. Overall, as an allosteric serotonin reuptake inhibitor that is somewhat different from classical SSRIs, escitalopram is the first choice judged by combined efficacy and tolerability, and nonclinical data have offered possible mechanisms through which escitalopram could be more efficacious, based on its interaction with orthosteric and allosteric binding sites at the serotonin transporter.
    International clinical psychopharmacology 01/2014; · 3.35 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Escitalopram appears to be a superior antidepressant to racemic citalopram. It has been hypothesized that binding of R-citalopram to the serotonin transporter (SERT) antagonizes escitalopram binding to and inhibition of the SERT, thereby curtailing the elevation of extracellular 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HTExt), and hence antidepressant efficacy. Further, it has been suggested that a putative allosteric binding site is important for binding of escitalopram to the primary, orthosteric, site, and for R-citalopram's inhibition hereof. Primary: Investigate at the human (h)SERT, at clinical relevant doses, whether R-citalopram antagonizes escitalopram-induced 5-HTExt elevation. Secondary: Investigate whether abolishing the putative allosteric site affects escitalopram-induced 5-HTExt elevation and/or modulates the effect of R-citalopram. Recombinant generation of hSERT transgenic mice; in vivo microdialysis; SERT binding; pharmacokinetics; 5-HT sensitive behaviors (tail suspension, marble burying). We generated mice expressing either the wild-type human SERT (hSERT(WT)) or hSERT carrying amino acid substitutions (A505V, L506F, I507L, S574T and I575T) collectively abolishing the putative allosteric site (hSERT(ALI/VFL+SI/TT)). One mg/kg escitalopram yielded clinical relevant plasma levels and brain levels consistent with therapeutic SERT occupancy. The hSERT mice showed normal basal 5-HTExt levels. Escitalopram-induced 5-HTExt elevation was not decreased by R-citalopram co-treatment and was unaffected by loss of the allosteric site. The behavioral effects of the clinically relevant escitalopram dose were small and tended to be enhanced by R-citalopram co-administration. We find no evidence that R-citalopram directly antagonizes escitalopram or that the putative allosteric site is important for hSERT inhibition by escitalopram.
    Psychopharmacology 05/2014; · 3.99 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 31, 2014