Bone marrow angiogenic ability and expression of angiogenic cytokines in myeloma: evidence favoring loss of marrow angiogenesis inhibitory activity with disease progression

Division of Hematology and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Blood (Impact Factor: 9.78). 09/2004; 104(4):1159-65. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2003-11-3811
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We compared the angiogenic potential of bone marrow plasma and the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and their receptors on plasma cells from patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), and newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NMM). Cytokine and cytokine-receptor expression was studied by bone marrow immunohistochemistry, quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on sorted plasma cells, and quantitative Western blot analysis. Bone marrow angiogenic potential was studied using a human in vitro angiogenesis assay. The expression levels of VEGF, bFGF, and their receptors were similar among MGUS, SMM, and NMM. Sixty-one percent of NMM samples stimulated angiogenesis in the in vitro angiogenesis assay compared with SMM (0%) and MGUS (7%) (P <.001). Importantly, 63% of MGUS samples inhibited angiogenesis compared with SMM (43%) and NMM (4%) (P <.001). The inhibitory activity was heat stable, not overcome by the addition of VEGF, and corresponded to a molecular weight below 10 kd by size-exclusion chromatography. Our results suggest that increasing angiogenesis from MGUS to NMM is, at least in part, explained by increasing tumor burden rather than increased expression of VEGF/bFGF by individual plasma cells. The active inhibition of angiogenesis in MGUS is lost with progression, and the angiogenic switch from MGUS to NMM may involve a loss of inhibitory activity.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) is involved in angiogenesis in both solid and hematological malignancies. In Multiple Myeloma (MM), serum Ang-2 correlates with disease progression and response to therapy. To address the patho-physiologic role of Ang-2 in MM associated angiogenesis, we used sera from patients with active MM, which contained significantly higher levels of the molecule, compared to those from patients with smoldering MM and Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance. MM Bone Marrow (BM) sera with high Ang-2 concentration specifically contributed to endothelial cell (EC) activation, while Ang-1 containing sera maintained EC stabilization. The functional dichotomy of Ang-1 and Ang-2 was confirmed by the triggering of distinctive signaling pathways down-stream the common Tie-2 receptor, i.e., the Akt or the ERK- phosphorylation pathway. Notably, Ang-2 but not VEGF serum levels correlated with BM micro-vessel density, further underscoring the key role of Ang-2 in angiogenesis. Western Blot, RT-PCR and immunocytochemistry identified MMEC as the major source of Ang-2, at variance with MM cells and CD14(+) BM monocytes. These data suggest that Ang-2 produced in the BM milieu may contribute to MM angiogenesis and suggest that the molecule can be further exploited both as angiogenesis biomarker and as a potential therapeutic target.
    Experimental Cell Research 10/2014; 330(1). DOI:10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.10.017 · 3.37 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We examined the pre-clinical activity of pan- histone deacetylase inhibitor LBH589 in combination with mTORC1 inhibitor RAD001 and observed that the drug combination strongly synergized in inducing cytotoxicity in multiple myeloma (MM) cells. LBH589 caused an increase in acetylated histones and RAD001 inhibited mTORC1 activity. RAD001 caused potent G0/G1 arrest while LBH589 induced pronounced apoptosis, both of which were enhanced when the drugs were used in combination. LBH589/RAD001 combination led to down regulation of pStat3, cyclins, CDKs and XIAP and up regulation of pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins. A clinical trial is underway using LBH589/RAD001 combination in relapsed MM patients.
    Leukemia Research 09/2014; 38(11). DOI:10.1016/j.leukres.2014.09.004 · 2.69 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: To non-invasively assess bone marrow microcirculation before and after therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). Experimental Design: 96 patients received DCE-MRI before and after primary treatment for newly diagnosed MM. For the 91 evaluable patients, treatment consisted of high-dose therapy (HDT) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in 82 patients and chemotherapy without ASCT in 9 patients. Additionally, 33 healthy volunteers were imaged as control group. Analysis of DCE-MRI was performed according to the two-compartment model by Brix to quantify amplitude A (associated with blood volume) and exchange rate constant kep (reflecting vessel permeability and perfusion). Results: Non-responders showed significantly higher A-values before the start of therapy compared to responders (p=0.02). In both, responders and non-responders to therapy, A-values dropped significantly (p=0.004 and <0.001, respectively) after primary therapy while lower values for kep were only found in responders (p<0.001). Depth of remission was significantly correlated to decreased bone marrow microcirculation: Patients in near complete (nCR) or complete remission (CR) after treatment showed significantly lower values for A compared to patients not achieving nCR+CR. The application of HDT or novel agents had no significant effect on DCE-MRI parameters after therapy, although patients treated with novel agents achieved more often nCR+CR (42%/12.5%;p<0.002). Higher kep-values at 2nd MRI were positively correlated to shorter overall survival (HR 3.53; 95% CI 1.21,10.33; p=0.02). Conclusions: Parameters from DCE-MRI are correlated to remission after primary therapy and outcome in newly diagnosed MM.
    Clinical Cancer Research 10/2014; 21(1). DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1029 · 8.19 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

1 Download
Available from
Dec 12, 2014