Article
Missed acute cardiac ischemia in the ED: limitations of diagnostic testing.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02118, USA.
American Journal of Emergency Medicine (impact factor:
1.98).
06/2004;
22(3):219-25.
pp.219-25
Source: PubMed
-
Citations (0)
- Cited In (1)
-
Article: Beckman Access versus the Bayer ACS:180 and the Abbott AxSYM cardiac Troponin-I real-time immunoassays: an observational prospective study.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Reliability of cardiac troponin-I assays under real-time conditions has not been previously well studied. Most large published cTnI trials have utilized protocols which required the freezing of serum (or plasma) for delayed batch cTnI analysis. We sought to correlate the presence of the acute ischemic coronary syndrome (AICS) to troponin-I values obtained in real-time by three random-mode analyzer immunoassay systems: the Beckman ACCESS (BA), the Bayer ACS:180 (CC) and the Abbott AxSYM (AX). METHODS: This was an observational prospective study at a university tertiary referral center. Serum from a convenience sampling of telemetry patients was analyzed in real-time for troponin-I by either the BA-CC (Arm-1) or BA-AX (Arm-2) assay pairs. Presence of the AICS was determined retrospectively and then correlated with troponin-I results. RESULTS: 100 patients were enrolled in Arm-1 (38 with AICS) and 94 in Arm-2 (48 with AICS). The BA system produced 51% false positives in Arm-1, 44% in Arm-2, with negative predictive values of 92% and 100% respectively. In Arm-1, the BA and the CC assays had sensitivities of 97% and 63% and specificities of 18% and 87%. In Arm-2, the BA and the AX assays had sensitivities of 100% and 83% and specificities of 11% and 78%. CONCLUSIONS: In real-time analysis, the performance of the AxSYM and ACS:180 assay systems produced more accurate troponin-I results than the ACCESS system.BMC Emergency Medicine 08/2004; 4(1):2.
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
acute cardiac ischemia
acute myocardial infarction [AMI]
appropriately triage
appropriately triaging patients
broad range
clinical challenge
diagnostic technologies
different aspects
gold standard
greatest challenges
limitations
negative cardiac biomarkers
negative coronary angiogram
negative exercise electrocardiographic stress test
patients
symptomatic coronary artery disease
tests
triage process
unknown performance
unstable angina pectoris [UAP]