Article

The orthotic effect of functional electrical stimulation on the improvement of walking in stroke patients with a dropped foot: a systematic review.

Roessingh Research and Development, PO Box 310, 7500 AH Enschede, the Netherlands.
Artificial Organs (Impact Factor: 1.87). 07/2004; 28(6):577-86. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2004.07310.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Analysis of the available evidence on the improvement of walking in stroke patients with a dropped foot when using peroneus stimulation.
A systematic review was performed to identify trials that investigated the orthotic effect of functional electrical stimulation (FES) on walking in stroke patients with a dropped foot. Two independent raters scored the methodological quality of the included articles. Walking speed and physiological cost index (PCI) were selected as the primary outcome measures. Studies that measured walking speed were pooled and a pooled difference including confidence interval was calculated.
Eight studies were included in the review, of which one was a randomized controlled trial. Methodological score ranged from 8 to 18 out of 19. Six studies measured walking speed. The pooled improvement in walking speed was 0.13 m/s (0.07-0.2) or 38% (22.18-53.8).
The present review suggests a positive orthotic effect of functional electrical stimulation on walking speed.

2 Followers
 · 
230 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Poststroke dorsiflexor weakness and paretic limb foot drop increase the risk of stumbling and falling and decrease overall functional mobility. It is of interest whether dorsiflexor muscle weakness is primarily neurological in origin or whether morphological differences also contribute to the impairment. Ten poststroke hemiparetic individuals were imaged bilaterally using noninvasive medical imaging techniques. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to identify changes in tibialis anterior muscle volume and muscle belly length. Ultrasonography was used to measure fascicle length and pennation angle in a neutral position. We found no clinically meaningful bilateral differences in any architectural parameter across all subjects, which indicates that these subjects have the muscular capacity to dorsiflex their foot. Therefore, poststroke dorsiflexor weakness is primarily neural in origin and likely due to muscle activation failure or increased spasticity of the plantar flexors. The current finding suggests that electrical stimulation methods or additional neuromuscular retraining may be more beneficial than targeting muscle strength (i.e., increasing muscle mass).
    07/2014; 2014:948475. DOI:10.1155/2014/948475
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Several neural interface technologies that stimulate and/or record from groups of axons have been developed. The longitudinal intrafascicular electrode (LIFE) is a fine wire that can provide access to a discrete population of axons within a peripheral nerve fascicle. Some applications require, or would benefit greatly from, technology that could provide access to multiple discrete sites in several fascicles.
    Journal of Neuroscience Methods 08/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.07.020 · 1.96 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: -This stage 2 trial investigated the therapeutic effect of single channel, peroneal functional electrical stimulation (FES) for improving gait and muscle activity in people with neurological injuries who were enrolled in an inpatient rehabilitation program. Twenty-six patients (16 male; M age = 51.3 yr., SD = 16.2; 2-33 days post-injury) completed the study. Participants were randomly assigned to an experimental group (n = 13) or control group (n = 13). The experimental group received FES and the control group received sensory stimulation during 45-min. gait training sessions three times a week for the duration of their stay in a rehabilitation facility (average of four sessions for both groups). Changes in gait speed, tibialis anterior muscle electromyography (EMG), and FIM™ locomotion scores were compared between groups. No significant differences were found, as both groups demonstrated similar improvements. The current results with this small sample suggest a low dose of gait training with single channel FES did not augment gait nor EMG activity beyond gait training with sensory stimulation; therefore, clinicians will likely be better served using a larger dose of FES or multichannel FES in this clinical population.
    Perceptual and Motor Skills 08/2014; 119(2). DOI:10.2466/15.25.PMS.119c19z5 · 0.66 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
406 Downloads
Available from
May 21, 2014