Article

Using maximal sterile barriers to prevent central venous catheter-related infection: a systematic evidence-based review.

Northwest Health Services Research and Development Program, Department of Medicine, University of Washington and VA Puget Sound HCS, 1660 South Columbian Way, HSR&D (152), Seattle, WA 98108, USA.
American Journal of Infection Control (Impact Factor: 2.33). 06/2004; 32(3):142-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2003.10.006
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Catheter-related infections cause increased morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. Infection control experts advocate using maximal sterile barriers to reduce the incidence of these infections. Low compliance rates suggest that clinicians are not convinced or are not aware that available data support adopting this more cumbersome, time-consuming, and relatively more expensive technique. Accordingly, we conducted a systematic, evidence-based review of the medical literature to determine the value of maximal sterile barriers.
We used multiple computerized databases, reference lists of identified articles, and queries of prominent investigators.
We selected studies comparing infectious outcomes using maximal sterile barriers versus using less stringent sterile barrier techniques during central venous catheter insertion.
We found only 3 primary research studies. Although each study suggests maximal sterile barriers may reduce infectious complications, the evidence supporting this conclusion is incomplete. The only randomized controlled trial limited enrollment to ambulatory oncology patients. These 3 studies differed notably in their patient populations, research designs, and health care settings.
The medical literature suggests maximal sterile barriers are advantageous in at least one setting and may be useful in others. While we believe the available evidence does support the use of maximal sterile barriers during routine insertion of central venous catheters, prospective studies and economic analyses would better clarify its value.

0 Followers
 · 
77 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It is critical for health care personnel to recognize and appreciate the detrimental impact of intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired infections. The economic, clinical, and social expenses to patients and hospitals are overwhelming. To limit the incidence of ICU-acquired infections, aggressive infection control measures must be implemented and enforced. Researchers and national committees have developed and continue to develop evidence-based guidelines to control ICU infections. A multifaceted approach, including infection prevention committees, antimicrobial stewardship programs, daily reassessments-intervention bundles, identifying and minimizing risk factors, and continuing staff education programs, is essential. Infection control in the ICU is an evolving area of critical care research. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Surgical Clinics of North America 10/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.suc.2014.08.011 · 1.93 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The range and number of interventional procedures is rapidly increasing each year. A major complication associated with many procedures is infection, which can result in serious adverse outcomes for the patient. Consequently, antibiotics are amongst the most common pharmaceuticals used by the interventionist, particularly for non-vascular procedures, yet almost no randomized controlled trial data exist to inform our decision when formulating appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis regimens. The purpose of this review is to provide an update on the utilization of antibiotics for common interventional radiology procedures, focusing on timing and duration of antibiotic prophylaxis.
    Clinical Radiology 11/2014; 70(3). DOI:10.1016/j.crad.2014.09.021 · 1.66 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Evidence based care (EBP) is imperative to the promotion of best practices. EBP forms the foundation for safe, efficient, and cost-effective patient management. It gives nurses the ability to implement care activities with proved outcomes and validate interventions from a database of sources. EBP not only has an impact on nursing practice but also affects theoretic models and care frameworks. It forms a foundation for professional care activities that use grounded protocols and guidelines and nursing education. This article includes resources to promote continued use of research evidence to guide in patient care areas. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Nursing Clinics of North America 03/2015; 50(1):19-32. DOI:10.1016/j.cnur.2014.10.002 · 0.59 Impact Factor