Management of patients with an increasing prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy.

James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Jefferson Building, Room 157, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287-2101, USA.
Current Urology Reports 07/2004; 5(3):179-87. DOI: 10.1007/s11934-004-0035-5
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Since the late 1980s, early detection and monitoring of men for prostate cancer by serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurement has resulted in an increase in the number of men presenting with a potentially curable disease. During the same time, in an attempt to provide a definitive cure, radical prostatectomy has been performed increasingly and now is regarded as the management option of choice for many patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Radical prostatectomy involves the removal of all of the prostate tissue resulting in the serum PSA level to steadily decline to an undetectable level within 4 to 6 weeks after surgery. Despite improvements in surgical technique and a marked downward stage shift brought about by serum PSA testing, approximately 25% of men ultimately will experience a subsequent increase in serum PSA to a detectable level indicating disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy within 15 years. In this brief review, the factors associated with a high risk for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy are discussed. Factors indicating whether the increasing serum PSA is caused by local recurrence or metastatic disease and the management options available to address serum PSA recurrence also are discussed.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives Luteinising hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists have become the mainstay for the treatment of advanced and metastatic prostate cancer (pCA) but are increasingly used in earlier stages of the disease for various indications. Eligard® is a depot formulation of leuprolide acetate using the novel delivery system Atrigel®. Eligard 6 is the first and only LHRH agonist commercially available that extends treatment for 6 mo.
    European Urology Supplements - EUR UROL SUPPL. 01/2006; 5(18):905-910.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although most prostate cancer (PCa) patients nowadays are diagnosed at an early stage of disease, unfortunately still a significant number of patients will develop advanced PCa or will be diagnosed at an advanced (or metastatic) stage of disease. The group of patients showing the highest increase in incidence are those with rising prostate specific antigen (PSA) after radical therapy.In the last quarter of 2004, a Medline search has been performed targeting publications on patients diagnosed with advanced PCa, as well as with PSA relapse after previous radical therapy. This review aims at providing guidance to optimise hormone therapy in those selected groups of patients by addressing three pivotal questions; (i) who should receive hormonal treatment, (ii) what type of hormonal therapy should the patient be offered and (iii) what is the best timing of starting hormonal treatment.In patients relapsing after radical therapy, the PSA doubling time (PSA DT) has become a critical instrument to distinguish patients to have innocuous PSA evolution from patients at high risk for disease progression. A PSA DT of 3 months seems to be the cut-off point for identifying patients at risk. Therefore patients with a PSA DT of less than 3 months should be advised to initiate hormonal therapy. Antiandrogen monotherapy may be considered in this setting as it has been shown to delay progression; however, significant survival data are not yet available. Whether luteinising hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists should be given continuously or intermittently (IHT) remains subject of debate.Surgical castration has been the standard of care in patients diagnosed with advanced PCa. Currently, LHRH agonists have become the preferred way of suppressing testosterone.Combination of an antiandrogen and a LHRH agonist (CAB) shows a modest benefit over LHRH agonist monotherapy. As CAB leads to increased side effects and costs, LHRH agonist monotherapy is preferred in the majority of patients.Conflicting data have been published concerning the optimal timing of LHRH agonist therapy. So it is not clear whether LHRH agonist therapy should be started immediately or deferred until appearance of symptoms. When initiating continuous hormone therapy, patients should be carefully monitored for the risk of long term androgen deprivation (anaemia, osteopenia and osteoporosis).
    European Urology Supplements - EUR UROL SUPPL. 01/2005; 4(8):21-29.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The use of luteinising hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists has increasingly evolved during the past 10 years. This review paper aims to discuss the role of LHRH agonists in patients with prostate cancer, a leading cause of cancer death in men.To retrieve the most relevant randomised clinical trials (RCTs), a Medline search was performed in the last quarter of 2004. Only fully published studies in English language with at least 25 patients per treatment arm and those frequently cited in review articles were included in the current review. This review does not claim to have included every single study with the selected treatment options, but aimed at including the most important trials performed and fully published with these treatments. The retrieved studies are discussed and put into perspective of the EAU guidelines.Initially, LHRH agonists were part of the treatment strategy for patients with advanced or metastatic disease. Currently, LHRH agonists are increasingly used as a treatment option in a neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant setting for patients with early or localised disease. LHRH analogues are used as adjuvant hormonal therapy after radical prostatectomy, and as neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment to radiotherapy. Patients with early or localised disease and a low Gleason score may experience clinical benefit from the neoadjuvant addition of LHRH agonists to radiotherapy. In patients with a high Gleason score and positive lymph nodes, adjuvant LHRH agonist treatment is considered standard therapy.In patients with rising prostate specific antigen (PSA) after radical treatment, hormonal therapy is often applied in an intermittent way, but results remain inconclusive.Maximum androgen blockade (MAB), a combination of a LHRH agonist and an antiandrogen, has been applied in advanced prostate cancer. However, due to the increased incidence of side effects and very modest survival benefits, there are few arguments to offer this treatment strategy to patients with prostate cancer.In summary, LHRH agonist therapy is important in the treatment of both early and advanced prostate cancer. Additional studies are needed to further define the optimal use of LHRH agonists within various patient risk groups.
    European Urology Supplements - EUR UROL SUPPL. 01/2005; 4(5):4-13.