Article

Improving topical microbicide applicators for use in resource-poor settings

Program for Appropriate Technology in Health, Seattle, WA 98107, USA.
American Journal of Public Health (Impact Factor: 4.23). 08/2004; 94(7):1089-92. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.94.7.1089
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT With more than 60 potential microbicides being assessed in preclinical or clinical trials, most attention has been centered on products intended for topical application, with much less research conducted on the applicators that will be used to deliver the microbicides. However, applicator design relates to safety, efficacy, and acceptability. As the foundation for a more systematic approach to evaluating and possibly improving designs for topical microbicide applicators, we conducted a literature review and a series of interviews with microbicide developers, trial investigators, and trial sponsors. Our findings indicate that issues concerning applicator safety, reuse, and cost warrant further investigation.

0 Followers
 · 
77 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Microbicides are topical compounds that could prevent sexually transmitted infections. Several compounds have demonstrated activity both in vitro and in animal models, but none has been approved for use in humans. A review of >100 recent publications from MEDLINE (through October 2005) and abstracts presented at recent conferences was undertaken to describe the current status of microbicide research and to delineate why microbicides are not yet available. More than 15 candidate microbicides are currently being studied in clinical trials. Their mechanisms of action include disruption of the viral membrane by surfactants, maintenance of an acidic vaginal pH, binding to the viral envelope to block receptor binding, and blocking of receptors; they may also be combined with antiretroviral drugs. The development of safe and effective microbicides has been delayed by limitations in understanding the biological processes of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission, difficulties in extrapolation from animal models, lack of established correlates of protection, and the need to enroll and follow large cohorts of high-risk participants for several years in order to demonstrate efficacy. Safe and effective topical microbicides are biologically plausible. Several trials that are under way may demonstrate the ability of microbicides to protect against transmission of HIV, but multiple challenges remain.
    The Journal of Infectious Diseases 01/2006; 193(1):36-44. DOI:10.1086/499163 · 5.78 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Targeted research on applicator safety has not been conducted as part of microbicide clinical trials and was considered necessary for ensuring safe and effective product use. Colposcopy, regarded as a standard method for assessing the safety of vaginal products, including microbicides, was used in this study to assess the external genitalia, vaginal epithelium and cervical epithelium after a single applicator use. The objectives of this study were to assess and compare the effects of three vaginal applicators on symptoms and signs of irritation of the external genitalia, vagina and cervix as seen by colposcopy after applicator use. Twenty women used three different vaginal applicators over three separate clinic visits 7-14 days apart and underwent a colposcopic examination before and after each applicator use. In total, the safety of each applicator was assessed over 20 product uses. No severe colposcopic finding was reported. Four minor colposcopic findings (petechiae) were considered possibly related to product use. No difference was found between applicators. This study provides reassuring data on the safety of the three applicator products from the perspective of causing vaginal trauma or irritation. Epithelial changes that could be more important for risk of disease transmission were not observed.
    Contraception 02/2006; 73(1):72-7. DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2005.06.054 · 2.93 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The objectives of this study were to prioritize applicator design attributes among women in the Dominican Republic and South Africa, and to determine how preferences differed based on sociodemographic variables. The goal was to identify acceptable microbicide applicator designs in 2 low-resource settings. We surveyed 895 women, randomly sampled from clinics in the Dominican Republic (n = 449) and South Africa (n = 446), with questions on sociodemographics, applicator attribute preferences, and price/design tradeoffs. Single-use design was the most valued attribute, and reusable design and low price were the least valued attributes in both populations. Preference for single-use design was associated with concern about reusable applicators spreading germs, secondary or higher education, older age, having children, and perception of moderate to high HIV risk. Acceptability factors related to microbicide delivery mechanisms should continue to be evaluated among potential microbicide users to directly inform product development and introduction of microbicides.
    Sex Transm Dis 02/2007; 34(1):15-9. DOI:10.1097/01.olq.0000218877.92778.fe · 2.75 Impact Factor
Show more