Article

Preoperative skin antiseptics for preventing surgical wound infections after clean surgery.

National Patient Safety Agency, 4-8 Maple Street, London, UK, W1T 5HD.
Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online) (Impact Factor: 5.94). 02/2004; DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003949.pub2
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Approximately 15% of elective surgery patients and 30% of patients receiving contaminated or dirty surgery are estimated to develop post-operative wound infections. The costs of surgical wound infection can be considerable in financial as well as social terms. Preoperative skin antisepsis is performed to reduce the risk of post-operative wound infections by removing soil and transient organisms from the skin. Antiseptics are thought to be both toxic to bacteria and aid their mechanical removal. The effectiveness of preoperative skin preparation is thought to be dependent on both the antiseptic used and the method of application, however it is unclear whether preoperative skin antisepsis actually reduces post-operative wound infection and if so which antiseptic is most effective.
To determine whether preoperative skin antisepsis reduces post-operative surgical wound infection.
We searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Trials Register and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in April 2004. In addition we handsearched journals, conference proceedings and bibliographies.
Randomised controlled trials evaluating the use of preoperative skin antiseptics applied immediately prior to incision in clean surgery. There were no restrictions based on language, date or publication status.
Three reviewers independently undertook data extraction and assessment of study quality. Pooling was inappropriate and trials are discussed in a narrative review.
We identified six eligible RCTs evaluating preoperative antiseptics. There was significant heterogeneity in the comparisons and the results could not be pooled. In one study, infection rates were significantly lower when skin was prepared using chlorhexidine compared with iodine. There was no evidence of a benefit in four trials associated with the use of iodophor impregnated drapes.
There is insufficient research examining the effects of preoperative skin antiseptics to allow conclusions to be drawn regarding their effects on post-operative surgical wound infections. Further research is needed.

2 Bookmarks
 · 
142 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cerebrospinal fluid shunt infection is associated with patient morbidity and high cost. We conducted a systematic review of the current evidence of comprehensive surgical protocols or individual interventions designed to reduce shunt infection incidence. A systematic review using PubMed and SCOPUS identified studies evaluating the effect of a particular intervention on shunt infection risk. Systemic prophylactic antibiotic or antibiotic-impregnated shunt efficacy studies were excluded. A total of 7429 articles were screened and 23 articles were included. Eight studies evaluated the effect of comprehensive surgical protocols. Shunt infection was reduced in all studies (absolute risk reduction 2.2-12.3 %). Level of evidence was low (level 4 in seven studies) due to the use of historical controls. Compliance ranged from 24.6 to 74.5 %. Surgical scrub with antiseptic foam and omission of a 5 % chlorhexidine gluconate preoperative hair wash were both associated with increased shunt infection. Twelve studies evaluated the effect of a single intervention. Only antibiotic-impregnated suture, a no-shave policy, and double gloving with glove change prior to shunt handling, were associated with a significant reduction in shunt infection. In a hospital with high methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) prevalence, a randomized controlled trial found that perioperative vancomycin rather than cefazolin significantly reduced shunt infection rates. Despite wide variation in compliance rates, the implementation of comprehensive surgical protocols reduced shunt infection in all published studies. Antibiotic-impregnated suture, a no-shave policy, double gloving with glove change prior to device manipulation, and 5 % chlorhexidine hair wash were associated with significant reductions in shunt infection.
    Child s Nervous System 02/2015; DOI:10.1007/s00381-015-2637-2 · 1.16 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Performing preoperative skin antisepsis to remove soil and microorganisms at the surgical site may help prevent patients from developing a surgical site infection. The updated AORN "Guideline for preoperative skin antisepsis" addresses the topics of preoperative patient bathing and hair removal, selection and application of skin antiseptics, and safe handling, storage, and disposal of skin antiseptics. This article focuses on key points of the guideline to help perioperative personnel develop protocols for patient skin antisepsis. The key points include the need for the patient to take a preoperative bath or shower and the need for perioperative personnel to manage hair at the surgical site, select a safe and effective antiseptic for the individual patient, perform a safe preoperative surgical site prep, and appropriately store skin antiseptics. Perioperative RNs should review the complete guideline for additional information and for guidance when writing and updating policies and procedures. Copyright © 2015 AORN, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    AORN journal 01/2015; 101(1):71-80. DOI:10.1016/j.aorn.2014.11.009
  • Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America 06/2012; 24(2):323-344. DOI:10.1016/j.ccell.2012.03.007 · 0.43 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
49 Downloads
Available from
May 20, 2014