Article

Cervical laminoplasty: use of a novel titanium plate to maintain canal expansion--surgical technique.

Emory Spine Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques (Impact Factor: 1.89). 09/2004; 17(4):265-71.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Cervical laminoplasty is a technique used to achieve spinal cord decompression in cases of myelopathy or myeloradiculopathy. The most common reason for failure of this technique is restenosis due to hinge closure. Various techniques have been employed to hold the laminar "door" open while the body heals the lamina hinge in the new expanded position. Ideally, a method of achieving laminar fixation should be technically straightforward, provide secure laminar fixation, and be rapid to minimize the risk of iatrogenic injuries, blood loss, and operative time. The authors describe the use of a novel plate designed to accomplish these goals. The technical issues relevant to performing the laminoplasty and securing the laminae are discussed. The plate has been proven biomechanically to be equal or superior to the currently used techniques. The use of this plate will allow the patient to engage in an early active rehabilitation protocol-while minimizing the risk of restenosis of the canal. This may ultimately lead to better preservation of motion and decreased axial neck pain following laminoplasty.

0 Followers
 · 
139 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To report the outcomes of a posterior hybrid decompression protocol for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) associated with hypertrophic ligamentum flavum (HLF). Laminoplasty is widely used in patients with CSM; however, for CSM patients with HLF, traditional laminoplasty does not include resection of a pathological ligamentum flavum. This study retrospectively reviewed 116 CSM patients with HLF who underwent hybrid decompression with a minimum of 12 months of follow-up. The procedure consisted of reconstruction of the C4 and C6 laminae using CENTERPIECE plates with spinous process autografts, and resection of the C3, C5, and C7 laminae. Surgical outcomes were assessed using Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, recovery rate, cervical lordotic angle, cervical range of motion, spinal canal sagittal diameter, bone healing rates on both the hinge and open sides, dural sac expansion at the level of maximum compression, drift-back distance of the spinal cord, and postoperative neck pain assessed by visual analog scale. No hardware failure or restenosis was noted. Postoperative JOA score improved significantly, with a mean recovery rate of 65.3±15.5%. Mean cervical lordotic angle had decreased 4.9 degrees by 1 year after surgery (P<0.05). Preservation of cervical range of motion was satisfactory postoperatively. Bone healing rates 6 months after surgery were 100% on the hinge side and 92.2% on the open side. Satisfactory decompression was demonstrated by a significantly increased sagittal canal diameter and cross-sectional area of the dural sac together with a significant drift-back distance of the spinal cord. The dural sac was also adequately expanded at the time of the final follow-up visit. Hybrid laminectomy and autograft laminoplasty decompression using Centerpiece plates may facilitate bone healing and produce a comparatively satisfactory prognosis for CSM patients with HLF.
    PLoS ONE 04/2014; 9(4):e95482. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0095482 · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A prospective follow-up study. To elucidate the impact of lamina closure on long-term outcomes after open-door laminoplasty. In a previous study, we did not find significant associations between lamina closure and short-term outcomes. METHODS.: Of the original cohort of 82 patients who underwent open-door laminoplasty, 69 were included in this study (52 men, 17 women; mean age, 60.9 yr; mean follow-up, 6.2 yr; 56 with spondylosis or disc herniation, 13 with ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament). Lamina closure was previously observed in 23 of these patients (closure group) but not in 46 (nonclosure group). The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores and Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire were recorded. The JOA score was 9.9 ± 3.2 in the closure group and 11.2 ± 2.3 in the nonclosure group before surgery (P = 0.1), 13.8 ± 2.3 and 13.8 ± 2.2 at 1.8 years (P = 0.99), and 13.6 ± 2.2 and 14.2 ± 2.7 at final follow-up (P = 0.29). The recovery rate of the JOA scores was 56.7 ± 30.0% and 46.7 ± 29.2% at 1.8 years (P = 0.22) and 51.0 ± 32.5 and 57.6 ± 31.1 at the final follow-up (P = 0.42). The subdomains assessed by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire at follow-up were cervical spine function, 68.7 ± 27.5 in the closure group and 67.7 ± 30.0 in the nonclosure group (P = 0.93); upper extremity function, 78.6 ± 24.3 and 87.6 ± 15.4 (P = 0.40); lower extremity function, 69.9 ± 26.0 and 73.9 ± 22.5 (P = 0.68); bladder function, 74.6 ± 22.6 and 84.9 ± 29.2 (P = 0.18); and quality of life, 53.9 ± 25.3 and 56.2 ± 18.1 (P = 0.96). Lamina closure did not significantly impact the long-term surgical outcomes of laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy. Although not statistically significant, the recovery rate tended to decline in the closure group compared with the nonclosure group during the long-term follow-up period, and the utilization of a laminar retention device to prevent the laminar closure should be considered.
    Spine 01/2012; 37(15):1288-91. DOI:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182498434 · 2.45 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the prevalence and clinical consequences of postoperative lamina closure after open-door laminoplasty and to identify the risk factors. Eighty-two consecutive patients with cervical myelopathy who underwent open-door laminoplasty without plates or spacers in the open side (Hirabayashi's original method) were included (62 men and 20 women with a mean age of 62 years and a mean follow-up of 1.8 years). In 67 patients the cause of cervical myelopathy was spondylotic myelopathy, and in 15 it was caused by ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament. Radiographic measurements were made of the anteroposterior diameters of the spinal canal and vertebral bodies from C3-6, and the presence of kyphosis were assessed. Lamina closure was defined as > or = 10% decrease in the canal-to-body ratio at the final follow-up compared with that immediately after surgery at > or = 1 vertebral level. The impact of lamina closure on neck pain, patient satisfaction, Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores, and recovery rates were also evaluated. The mean canal-to-body ratio at C3-6 was 0.69-0.72 preoperatively, 1.25-1.28 immediately after surgery, and 1.18-1.24 at the final follow-up examination. Lamina closure was observed in 34% of patients and was not associated with sex, age, or cause of myelopathy, but was significantly associated with the presence of preoperative kyphosis (p = 0.014). Between patients with and without lamina closure, there was no significant difference in preoperative (9.7 +/- 3.1 vs 10.6 +/- 2.5) and postoperative (13.7 +/- 2.4 vs 13.1 +/- 2.7) Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores, recovery rates (53.9 +/- 29.9% vs 44.3 +/- 29.5%), neck pain scores (3.5 +/- 0.7 vs 3.3 +/- 1.0), or patient satisfaction level (4.0 +/- 1.4 vs 4.8 +/- 1.0). Lamina closure at > or = 1 vertebral level occurred in 34% of patients. Although patients with lamina closure obtained equivalent recovery from myelopathy in a short-term follow-up, they tended to be less satisfied with surgery compared with those who did not have closure. The only significant risk factor identified was the presence of preoperative cervical kyphosis, and preventative methods for lamina closure, therefore, should be considered for patients with preoperative kyphosis.
    Journal of Neurosurgery Spine 01/2009; 9(6):530-7. DOI:10.3171/SPI.2008.4.08176 · 2.36 Impact Factor