Article

Autoantibodies to Annexin XI-A and Other Autoantigens in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer.

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Wayne Stste University, 4201 St. Antoine Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. .
Cancer Research (Impact Factor: 8.65). 09/2004; 64(15):5089-96. DOI:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-0932
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We report on the identification of autoantigens commonly recognized by sera from patients with breast cancer. We selected ten sera from patients with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) of the breast with high titer IgG autoantibodies for biopanning of a T7 phage breast cancer cDNA display library. A high throughput method involved the assembly of 938 T7 phages encoding potential breast cancer autoantigens. Microarrays of positive phages were probed with sera from 90 patients with breast cancer [15 patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and 75 patients with IDC of the breast], with 51 non-cancer control sera and with sera from 21 patients with systemic autoimmune diseases. A 12-phage breast cancer predictor group was constructed with phage inserts recognized by sera from patients with breast cancer and not by non-cancer or autoimmune control sera (P < 0.0001). Several autoantigens including annexin XI-A, the p80 subunit of the Ku antigen, ribosomal protein S6, and other unknown autoantigens could significantly discriminate between breast cancer and non-cancer control sera. Biopanning with three different sera led to the cloning of partial cDNA sequences identical to annexin XI-A. IgG autoantibodies reacting with the amino acid 41-74 sequence of annexin XI-A were found in 19% of all women with breast cancer but in 60% of sera from women with DCIS of the breast. In addition, partial sequences identical to annexin XI-A, nucleolar protein interacting with the forkhead-associated (FHA) domain of pKi-67, the KIAA1671 gene product, ribosomal protein S6, cyclin K, elongation factor-2, Grb2-associated protein 2, and other unknown proteins could distinguish DCIS from IDC of the breast and appear to be potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of breast cancer.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
68 Views
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: To identify genetic variants that predispose to type 2 diabetes (T2D) with cataract. Patients and methods: Genome-wide association study (GWAS) of T2D patients with cataract, as graded by Lens Opacities Classification System (LOCS). A total of 109 T2D patients with cataract score equal to or above 10 designated as the study group, 649 T2D patients with cataract score equal to or below 3 as the control group. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with p-values < 10(-5) were considered to be putatively associated with the diabetic cataract. Results: Fifteen SNPs were found to be putatively associated with diabetic cataract. These variants were located near the following genes: PPARD, CCDC102A, GBA3, NEDD9, GABRR1/2, RPS6KA2, tcag7.1163, TAC1, GALNTL1 and KIAA1671. We defined haplotype 1 to haplotype 4 from the alternative alleles of related polymorphisms. Distribution of haplotype 2 on chromosome 4 and haplotype 4 on chromosome 7 revealed significant differences (OR = 1.86 and 1.69, respectively; 95% confidence interval were 1.26-2.76 and 1.23-2.31, respectively). Conclusions: The 15 loci coded on chromosomes 4, 6, 7, 14, 16 and 22 were associated with diabetic cataract. Gene functions are either with mechanisms of regulating blood sugar or formation of cataract. High linkage disequilibrium appeared on chromosome 4p15.31 and chromosome 7q21.3.
    Ophthalmic Genetics 11/2012; · 1.07 Impact Factor
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Glioma is the most common primary brain tumor, yet the high cost of diagnostic imaging has made early detection of asymptomatic glioma a formidable challenge. Thus, the development of a convenient, sensitive, and cost-effective diagnostic strategy, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) based on glioma-specific and World Health Organization (WHO) grade-specific autoantibody serum markers, is necessary. To this end, a comparative proteomic analysis based on two-dimensional western blotting was carried out with the sera of glioma patients and normal controls. Of the 11 novel glioma-expressed autoantibodies, the autoantibody against glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) showed the highest differential expression. To investigate the potential clinical utility of the GFAP autoantibody as an early diagnostic marker for glioma, an ELISA-based assay was developed and validated with sera from glioma patients with WHO grades II (n = 19), III (n = 17), and IV (n = 24). The GFAP autoantibody level directly correlated with WHO grade and tumor volume. Sera from patients of non-glioma brain tumors, as well as non-brain tumors, showed much lower levels of GFAP autoantibody than those of the glioma patients, indicating that elevated GFAP autoantibody is specific to glioma patients. Analysis of the receiver operating characteristics curve suggested that the new ELISA has good distinguishing power and sensitivity for diagnosing glioma patients. This is the first ELISA assay developed for an autoantibody of a glioma antigen and may prove valuable for the clinical detection of glioma.
    Tumor Biology 04/2013; · 2.52 Impact Factor
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Paraneoplastic syndromes and infection are known causes of autoimmunity, but the etiology of most autoimmune syndromes remains unknown. If the immune system can effectively fight malignant cell lines, it is likely that many potential tumors are controlled before becoming clinically apparent. This phenomenon is a potential explanation for all non-infectious auto-immunity including many rheumatic diseases. The presented discussion argues that all auto-immune disease is secondary to infection or neoplasia, and occult neoplasia is responsible for rheumatic diseases. Detecting occult neoplasia is inherently not possible, but if this theory bears truth, induced autoimmune disease could become a powerful treatment of malignancy.
    Medical Hypotheses 01/2013; · 1.05 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
0 Downloads