Six-year intervention outcomes for adolescent children of parents with the human immunodeficiency virus

Division of Adult Psychiatry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Ángeles, California, United States
Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (Impact Factor: 4.25). 09/2004; 158(8):742-8. DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.158.8.742
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Having a parent with the human immunodeficiency virus has a significant negative impact on an adolescent child's adjustment.
To assess the adjustment of adolescent children to having a parent with the human immunodeficiency virus over 6 years, following the delivery of a coping skills intervention.
A randomized controlled trial with repeated evaluations that was analyzed with an intention-to-treat analysis. A skill-based intervention was delivered in 3 modules over 24 sessions, with the third module being delivered only if parents died.
A representative sample of parents with the human immunodeficiency virus (n = 307) and their adolescent children (n = 423) was recruited from the Division of AIDS Services in New York City; 51.5% (n = 158) of the parents died.
Employment and school enrollment, receiving public welfare support, early parenthood, mental health symptoms, and the quality of romantic relationships.
Over 6 years, significantly more adolescents in the intervention condition than the control condition were employed or in school (82.58% vs 68.94%), were less likely to receive public welfare payments (25.66% vs 36.65%), were less likely to have psychosomatic symptoms (mean, 0.24 vs 0.31), were more likely to report better problem-solving and conflict resolution skills in their romantic relationships (mean score, 4.38 vs 4.20), expected to have a partner with a good job (mean, 4.57 vs 4.19), and expected to be married when parenting (mean, 3.05 vs 2.40). With marginal significance, the percentage of parents in the intervention condition (34.6%) was less than in the control condition (44.1%).
Physicians must consider the psychosocial consequences of illness-related challenges on children and provide interventions.

Download full-text


Available from: Mary Jane Rotheram-Borus, Nov 07, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In order to quantify the effectiveness of family interventions in preventing and reducing adolescent illicit drug use, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. We searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Educational Research Information Centre (ERIC), MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO for studies published between 1995 and 2013. Results were described separately for different outcomes (marijuana vs. other illicit drugs) and intervention types (universal, selective, and indicated prevention). Meta-analyses were performed when data were sufficient (e.g., marijuana and other illicit drug initiation in universal samples), using random effect models. Otherwise, we provided narrative reviews (e.g., regarding selective and indicated prevention). Thirty-nine papers describing 22 RCTs were eligible for inclusion. Universal family interventions targeting parent-child dyads are likely to be effective in preventing (OR 0.72; 95 % CI 0.56, 0.94) and reducing adolescent marijuana use, but not in preventing other illicit drugs (OR 0.90; 95 % CI 0.60, 1.34). Among high-risk groups, there is no clear evidence for the effectiveness of family interventions in preventing and reducing illicit drug use and drug disorders. The three small RCTs among substance-(ab)using adolescents gave some indication that programs might reduce the frequency of illicit drug use. Family interventions targeting parent-child dyads are likely to be effective in preventing and reducing adolescent marijuana use in general populations, but no evidence for other illicit drug use was found. We underline the need to strengthen the evidence base with more trials, especially among at-risk populations.
    Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review 05/2015; DOI:10.1007/s10567-015-0185-7 · 4.75 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Parentification refers to children or adolescents assuming adult roles before they are emotionally or developmentally ready to manage those roles successfully. We assess predictors and outcomes of parentification among adolescent children of Parents with AIDS (PWAs) in two phases. In Phase 1, relationships among parental AIDS-related illness, parent drug use, parent and adolescent demographics, and parentification indicators (parental, spousal, or adult role-taking) were assessed among 183 adolescent-parent pairs (adolescents: 11 to 18 years, M= 14.8 years, 54% female; parents: 80% female). Adult role-taking was associated with maternal PWAs, female adolescents, and greater parent drug use. Greater parental AIDS-related illness predicted more spousal and parental role-taking. Parent drug use predicted more parental role-taking. In Phase 2, we examined the impact of parentification on later adolescent psychological adjustment (N = 152 adolescents). Adult role-taking predicted more internalized emotional distress; parental role-taking predicted externalized problem behaviors: sexual behavior, alcohol and marijuana use, and conduct problems. Given these dysfunctional outcomes, we discuss interventions to mitigate parentification among children of PWAs.
    Family Process 07/2004; 38(2):193 - 208. DOI:10.1111/j.1545-5300.1999.00193.x · 1.73 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The author teaches the art and statistical science of modern longitudinal data analysis, special attention being paid to specifying, understanding and interpreting longitudinal data models. He shows how to inspect longitudinal data graphically, analyze the time trend and covariates, model the covariance matrix and, finally, draw relevant conclusions. Covariance models include, among others, random effects, autoregressive, autoregressive moving average, antedependence, factor analytic and completely unstructured models. Longer sections cover an introduction to and critique of nonlongitudinal analyses of longitudinal data, missing data concepts, regression diagnostics and simultaneous modeling of two longitudinal variables. Shorter sections include a general discussion how computational algorithms work, handling transformed data, and basic design issues. This book is intended for master’s and doctoral students in statistics and biostatistics as well as for doctoral students of many other disciplines such as psychology, education, economics, sociology, business, epidemiology and engineering. The common background must be a good course in linear regression.