Article

Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension in Latinos - The Los Angeles Latino Eye Study

Doheny Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, 90033, USA.
Ophthalmology (Impact Factor: 6.17). 09/2004; 111(8):1439-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.01.025
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To estimate age- and gender-specific prevalences of ocular hypertension and open-angle glaucoma (OAG) in adult Latinos.
Population-based, cross-sectional study.
Six thousand three hundred fifty-seven Latinos 40 years and older from 6 census tracts in Los Angeles, California.
The study cohort consisted of all self-identified Latinos of primarily Mexican ancestry 40 years and older residing in 6 census tracts in La Puente, California. All participants underwent a complete ophthalmologic examination, including measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP), visual field (VF) testing using an automated field analyzer, and simultaneous stereoscopic fundus photography of the optic disc. Ocular hypertension was defined as IOP of >21 mmHg and the absence of optic disc damage or abnormal VF test results. Open-angle glaucoma was defined as the presence of an open angle and various criteria that included a glaucomatous VF abnormality and/or evidence of glaucomatous optic disc damage in at least one eye.
Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
For the 6142 participants who underwent a complete ophthalmologic examination at the clinical center, the prevalence of OAG was 4.74% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.22%-5.30%). The prevalence of ocular hypertension was 3.56% (95% CI, 3.12%-4.06%). The prevalences of OAG and ocular hypertension were higher in older Latinos than in younger Latinos (P<0.0001). No gender-related differences in prevalences of OAG and ocular hypertension were present. The mean IOP, mean deviation, and mean vertical cup-disc ratio in persons with OAG were 17 mmHg, -9.6 decibels, and 0.6, respectively. Seventy-five percent of Latinos with OAG and 75% of Latinos with ocular hypertension were previously undiagnosed. Further, 17% of Latinos with OAG and 23% of Latinos with ocular hypertension had received treatment for "glaucoma."
Our data suggest that the prevalence of OAG is high among Latinos of Mexican ancestry. The higher prevalence of OAG in older Latinos emphasizes the public health importance of providing eye care services for the early diagnosis and management of this condition in Latinos.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Stanley Azen, Jul 07, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
172 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: To study the associations between serum 25-hydroxy-vitamin D (25(OH)D) levels, vitamin D administration and intraocular pressure (IOP). Methods: The design of the study included a nested case-control study and a randomized controlled intervention trial. In the first part, healthy Caucasians with high or low serum 25(OH)D levels were recruited from a population-based study. IOP of the right eye was measured by the use of a rebound tonometer. In the second part, those with low serum 25(OH)D levels were randomized to receive either capsules of vitamin D3 20 000 IU twice per week or placebo for 6 months before IOP was measured again. Results: Intraocular pressure in the 87 participants with low serum 25(OH)D levels (mean 40.1 ± 12.9 nm) did not differ from IOP in the 42 participants with high serum 25(OH)D levels (mean 85.1 ± 14.0 nm) (15.9 ± 3.3 mmHg versus 15.6 ± 3.1 mmHg, p = 0.56, independent t-test). After intervention, IOP decreased by -0.8 ± 2.1 mmHg (p = 0.017, paired t-test) in the vitamin D group (n = 39) and -0.8 ± 2.5 mmHg (p = 0.059) in the placebo group (n = 39), but the change was not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.92, independent t-test). Conclusion: This study in healthy participants revealed no associations between serum 25(OH)D levels and IOP, and administration of vitamin D3 to participants with low levels of 25(OH)D did not affect IOP. These results do not support a role of vitamin D in the regulation of IOP.
    Acta ophthalmologica 04/2013; 92(4). DOI:10.1111/aos.12125 · 2.51 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose:  To determine whether differences in corneal hysteresis (CH) and central corneal thickness (CCT) between black, Hispanic and white subjects exist independently of one another. Methods:  Retrospective, cross-sectional data were reviewed for 807 eyes of 410 patients consecutively evaluated for glaucoma. Included patients had open angles, at least one reliable 24-2 perimetric examination and no evidence of nonglaucomatous vision loss. Patients underwent CH measurement with the ocular response analyzer followed by CCT measurement and full ocular examination. Patients were asked to self-classify their race or ethnicity. Statistical analyses were performed to identify characteristics that varied between black, Hispanic and white subjects and to explain this variation. Results:  Of the 270 patients (511 eyes) included, 84 were black, 96 Hispanic and 90 white. There were no significant differences in diagnosis, sex, age, intraocular pressure or glaucoma severity between races/ethnicities (p ≥ 0.16). Blacks were found to have lower CCT (529.3 μm) and CH (8.7 mmHg) compared to Hispanics (544.7 μm, p = 0.008; 9.4 mmHg, p = 0.007) and whites (549.9 μm, p < 0.001; 9.8 mmHg, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, inter-racial/ethnic differences in CCT were not found to exist independent of CH (p ≥ 0.10), whereas the significant intergroup variation in CH remained after adjustment for CCT and other covariates (p ≤ 0.005). Conclusions:  Variation in CCT between races/ethnicities does not exist independent of CH. However, significant intergroup variation in CH is present independent of CCT. This finding suggests that CH may be a preferable measurement to evaluate intergroup differences in corneal properties and their relationship to open-angle glaucoma.
    Acta ophthalmologica 08/2012; 90(8). DOI:10.1111/j.1755-3768.2012.02509.x · 2.51 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A community-based survey was conducted in Rajnandangaon district of Chhattisgarh state of central India in 2001 to assess the prevalence of glaucoma in the age group of =35 years. Community-based cross-sectional survey. Ophthalmologists measured ocular pressure using Perkins applanation tonometer. Best corrected visual acuity was checked by ETDRS chart. After dilating the pupil the fundus was examined. A sketch diagram was drawn to note glaucomatous changes in optic disc and the surrounding retina. The field of vision was tested on Bjerrum screen. Gonioscopy was performed to determine type of glaucoma. Persons and their relatives were interviewed to find out risk factors and glaucoma treatment in the past. Seven thousand four hundred and thirty-eight (87.3%) persons were examined. The age-sex standardized prevalence of glaucoma was 3.68% (95% CI 3.27 to 4.07). Gender variation of glaucoma was not significant. [OR = 1.13 (CI 95% 0.88 to 1.44)] Glaucoma varied significantly by age groups. (chi2 = 48.2, degree of freedom = 3 P < 0.001) Among those patients diagnosed to suffer from glaucoma, the proportion of open angle, closed angle, secondary glaucoma, ocular hypertension and glaucoma suspects was 13.1%, 21.2%, 21.2%, 14.5% and 30% respectively. Different types of visual disabilities were associated with glaucoma. However, unilateral blindness in glaucoma was unusual. Twenty-five per cent of the glaucoma cases were detected for the first time during the survey. The prevalence of glaucoma was high and the angle closure type was more compared to the open angle glaucoma.
    Indian Journal of Ophthalmology 01/2008; 56(1):57-62. DOI:10.4103/0301-4738.37597 · 0.93 Impact Factor