Effect of a bacterial pheromone peptide on host chemokine degradation in group A streptococcal necrotising soft-tissue infections.

Department of Clinical Microbiology, The Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem 91010, Israel.
The Lancet (Impact Factor: 39.21). 03/2004; 363(9410):696-703. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15643-2
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Necrotising soft-tissue infections due to group A streptococcus (GAS) are rare (about 0.2 cases per 100000 people). The disease progresses rapidly, causing severe necrosis and hydrolysis of soft tissues. Histopathological analysis of necrotic tissue debrided from two patients (one with necrotising fasciitis and one with myonecrosis) showed large quantities of bacteria but no infiltrating neutrophils. We aimed to investigate whether the poor neutrophil chemotaxis was linked with the ability of group A streptococcus (GAS) to degrade host chemokines.
We did RT-PCR, ELISA, and dot-blot assays to establish whether GAS induces synthesis of interleukin 8 mRNA, but subsequently degrades the released chemokine protein. Class-specific protease inhibitors were used to characterise the protease that degraded the chemokine. We used a mouse model of human soft-tissue infections to investigate the pathogenic relevance of GAS chemokine degradation, and to test the therapeutic effect of a GAS pheromone peptide (SilCR) that downregulates activity of chemokine protease.
The only isolates from the necrotic tissue were two beta-haemolytic GAS strains of an M14 serotype. A trypsin-like protease released by these strains degraded human interleukin 8 and its mouse homologue MIP2. When innoculated subcutaneously in mice, these strains produced a fatal necrotic soft-tissue infection that had reduced neutrophil recruitment to the site of injection. The M14 GAS strains have a missense mutation in the start codon of silCR, which encodes a predicted 17 aminoacid pheromone peptide, SilCR. Growth of the M14 strain in the presence of SilCR abrogated chemokine proteolysis. When SilCR was injected together with the bacteria, abundant neutrophils were recruited to the site of infection, bacteria were cleared without systemic spread, and the mice survived. The therapeutic effect of SilCR was also obtained in mice challenged with M1 and M3 GAS strains, a leading cause of invasive infections.
The unusual reduction in neutrophils in necrotic tissue of people with GAS soft-tissue infections is partly caused by a GAS protease that degrades interleukin 8. In mice, degradation can be controlled by administration of SilCR, which downregulates GAS chemokine protease activity. This downregulation increases neutrophil migration to the site of infection, preventing bacterial spread and development of a fulminant lethal systemic infection.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Musculoskeletal infections, including surgical-site and implant-associated infections, often cause progressive inflammation and destroy areas of the soft tissue. Treating infections, especially those caused by multi-antibiotic resistant bacteria such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) remains a challenge. Although there are a few animal models that enable the quantitative evaluation of infection in soft tissues, these models are not always reproducible or sustainable. Here, we successfully established a real-time, in vivo, quantitative mouse model of soft-tissue infection in the superficial gluteus muscle (SGM) using bioluminescence imaging. A bioluminescent strain of MRSA was inoculated into the SGM of BALB/c adult male mice, followed by sequential measurement of bacterial photon intensity and serological and histological analyses of the mice. The mean photon intensity in the mice peaked immediately after inoculation and remained stable until day 28. The serum levels of interleukin-6, interleukin-1 and C-reactive protein at 12 hours after inoculation were significantly higher than those prior to inoculation, and the C-reactive protein remained significantly elevated until day 21. Histological analyses showed marked neutrophil infiltration and abscesses containing necrotic and fibrous tissues in the SGM. With this SGM mouse model, we successfully visualized and quantified stable bacterial growth over an extended period of time with bioluminescence imaging, which allowed us to monitor the process of infection without euthanizing the experimental animals. This model is applicable to in vivo evaluations of the long-term efficacy of novel antibiotics or antibacterial implants.
    PLoS ONE 09/2014; 9(9):e106367. · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Quorum sensing (QS) is a widespread phenomenon in the microbial world that has important implications in the coordination of population-wide responses in several bacterial pathogens. In Group A Streptococcus (GAS), many questions surrounding QS systems remain to be solved pertaining to their function and their contribution to the GAS lifestyle in the host. The QS systems of GAS described to date can be categorized into four groups: regulator gene of glucosyltransferase (Rgg), Sil, lantibiotic systems, and LuxS/AI-2. The Rgg family of proteins, a conserved group of transcription factors that modify their activity in response to signaling peptides, has been shown to regulate genes involved in virulence, biofilm formation and competence. The sil locus, whose expression is regulated by the activity of signaling peptides and a putative two-component system (TCS), has been implicated on regulating genes involved with invasive disease in GAS isolates. Lantibiotic regulatory systems are involved in the production of bacteriocins and their autoregulation, and some of these genes have been shown to target both bacterial organisms as well as processes of survival inside the infected host. Finally AI-2 (dihydroxy pentanedione, DPD), synthesized by the LuxS enzyme in several bacteria including GAS, has been proposed to be a universal bacterial communication molecule. In this review we discuss the mechanisms of these four systems, the putative functions of their targets, and pose critical questions for future studies. BACTERIAL COMMUNICATION IN GRAM-POSITIVE BACTERIA For a long time, bacteria were thought of as organisms carrying out self-sufficient and independent, unicellular lifestyles. During the last 40 years, several studies have demonstrated how, in fact, bacteria interact and establish complex social behaviors with their siblings and with other bacteria in their community to develop beneficial actions for the population, by means of conserved chemical languages. Quorum Sensing (QS) is the com-munication process in which bacteria produce, secrete and detect chemical signals with the purpose of triggering specific pheno-typical responses. QS regulates genes involved in population-wide decisions and behaviors that are beneficial when performed as a synchronous group rather than at the individual level and which include bioluminiscence, sporulation, competence, antibi-otic production, biofilm formation, and secretion of virulence factors (Reviewed by Atkinson and Williams, 2009; Ng and Bassler, 2009; Rutherford and Bassler, 2012). QS signaling in Gram-positive bacteria (Figure 1) operates through the activity of post-translationally modified oligopep-tides, named autoinducing peptides or pheromones, which can range from 5 to 34 amino acids in length and can adopt either linear or cyclical conformations (Håvarstein et al., 1995; Ji et al., 1995; Kuipers et al., 1995; Solomon et al., 1996; Otto et al., 1998; Mayville et al., 1999; Sturme et al., 2005). These pheromones are initially synthesized as inactive pro-peptides in the ribosome, and then exported from the cell by either the general secretion system (Sec) or by dedicated ABC transporters (Hui and Morrison, 1991; Zhang et al., 2002; Stephenson et al., 2003). During the export event, pro-peptides undergo proteolytic processing (and in some cases additional covalent modification) to generate the active pheromone, and a variety of enzymes have been involved in these maturation processes (Magnuson et al., 1994; Otto et al., 1998; An et al., 1999; Mayville et al., 1999; Zhang et al., 2002; Lanigan-Gerdes et al., 2007; Thoendel and Horswill, 2009). When the pheromones surpass threshold concentrations in the extracellular medium they are efficiently detected by transmembrane receptors of the two-component system (TCS) signal transduction family, leading to differential phosphorylation of a response regulator and consequent change in target gene expression. Alternatively, pheromones can be imported into the cytoplasm via peptide transporter complexes, most commonly the Opp/Ami oligopep-tide permease, a promiscuous transporter of peptides involved in the import of nutritional peptides, peptidoglycan recycling com-ponents as well as pheromone peptides for other QS systems (Leonard et al., 1996; Lazazzera et al., 1997; Slamti and Lereclus, 2002; Fontaine et al., 2010; Mashburn-Warren et al., 2010; Chang et al., 2011). Once inside the cell, peptide pheromones bind and directly modulate the activity of transcriptional regulators inside the cell. As a result of signaling, target genes change their expres-sion pattern and genes encoding for the pheromone pre-peptides are upregulated, increasing the production of mature pheromone
    Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 09/2014; 4. · 2.62 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The connection between bacterial pathogens and unfolded protein response (UPR) is poorly explored. In this review we highlight the evidence showing that group A streptococcus (GAS) induces endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and UPR through which it captures the amino acid asparagine (ASN) from the host. GAS acts extracellularly and during adherence to host cells it delivers the hemolysin toxins; streptolysin O (SLO) and streptolysin S (SLS). By poorly understood pathways, these toxins trigger UPR leading to the induction of the transcriptional regulator ATF4 and consequently to the upregulation of asparagine synthetase (ASNS) transcription leading to production and release of ASN. GAS senses ASN and alters gene expression profile accordingly, and increases the rate of multiplication. We suggest that induction of UPR by GAS and by other bacterial pathogens represent means through which bacterial pathogens gain nutrients from the host, obviating the need to become internalized or inflict irreversible cell damage.
    Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 08/2014; 4:105. · 2.62 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 20, 2014