Immunohistochemical patterns in rectal cancer: Application of tissue microarray with prognostic correlations

Department of Oncology, Jubileum Institute, University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
International Journal of Cancer (Impact Factor: 5.09). 11/2004; 111(6):921-8. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.20229
Source: PubMed


We utilized the high-throughput tissue microarray method to characterize immunohistochemical expression patterns with correlations to prognosis in rectal cancer. Immunostaining for the markers Ki-67, Bcl-2, p53, EGFR, E-cadherin, beta-catenin, MLH1 and MSH2 was performed in 269 rectal cancers. Expression profiles were correlated to metastasis-free survival. Immunostaining revealed frequent upregulation and/or aberrant staining patterns for several of the markers, but Ki-67, p53, Bcl-2 and EGFR did not show any correlation to prognosis. However, reduced membranous staining for beta-catenin (p = 0.04), lack of cytoplasmic staining for beta-catenin (p = 0.04), reduced membranous staining for E-cadherin (p = 0.02) and lack of cytoplasmic staining for E-cadherin (p = 0.02) correlated with metastatic disease. Multivariate analysis including the factors Dukes' stage and tumor differentiation grade demonstrated increased risk of metastatic disease in tumors with lack of cytoplasmic staining for beta-catenin (HR = 3.1, p = 0.02), reduced membranous staining for beta-catenin (HR = 1.7, p = 0.06) and reduced membranous staining for E-cadherin (HR = 2.1, p = 0.06). Loss of MMR protein expression was confirmed to be a rare event in rectal cancer with loss of MLH1 staining in 3% and MSH2 in 1% of the tumors. The lack of prognostic information contributed by most of these markers suggests that single markers for prognosis may be of limited value in rectal cancer. However, altered expression of beta-catenin and E-cadherin correlated with metastatic disease, and these markers may have prognostic importance in rectal cancer.

Download full-text


Available from: Mårten Fernö, Nov 10, 2014
  • Source
    • "83.070 4.155 1660.942 [54] "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The E-cadherin-catenin complex provides cell-cell adhesion. In order for a carcinoma to metastasize, cancer cells must let go of their hold of neighboring cells in the primary tumor. The presence of components of the E-cadherin-catenin complex in 246 rectal adenocarcinomas was examined by immunohistochemistry and compared to their presence in 219 colon carcinomas. The expression data were correlated to clinical information from the patients' records. There were statistically significant differences in protein expression between the rectal and the colon carcinomas regarding membranous beta-catenin, gamma-catenin, p120-catenin, and E-cadherin, as well as nuclear beta-catenin. In the rectal carcinomas, there was a significant inverse association between the expression of p120-catenin in cell membranes of the primary tumors and the occurrence of local recurrence, while membranous protein expression of beta-catenin was inversely related to distant metastases.
    Gastroenterology Research and Practice 08/2010; 2010(1687-6121). DOI:10.1155/2010/616023 · 1.75 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Two previous studies have utilised tissue microarray technology to investigate the combination of p53/Bcl-2 in rectal cancer. In the first, Hoos et al, studied 100 patients with lymph-node negative rectal cancer, and found an increased number of deaths in the patients with p53(+)/Bcl-2(-) tumors (7/33, 21.2%) compared with the p53(-)/Bcl-2(+) group (2/13, 15.4%) [13], and a recent study of 269 patients with Dukes stage A-D rectal cancer reported a lower rate of metastatic disease in p53(-)/Bcl-2(+) tumours, with p53(+)/Bcl-2(-) tumours showing a worse outcome [14]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Advances in our understanding of the molecular biology of colorectal cancer have fuelled the search for novel molecular prognostic markers to complement existing staging systems. Markers assessed in combination may perform better than those considered individually. Using high-throughput tissue microarray technology, we describe the prognostic value of combined p53 / Bcl-2 status in colorectal cancer. Tumour samples from 462 patients who underwent elective surgery to resect a primary colorectal cancer between 1994 and 2000 (mean follow-up of 75 months) were assembled in tissue microarray format. Clinico-pathological data including tumour grade, stage, vascular invasion status along with disease specific survival data has been collected prospectively. Immunohistochemical analysis of p53 and Bcl-2 expression was performed using antibodies DO-7 (p53) and 124 (Bcl-2), and results correlated with known clinico-pathological variables and outcomes. Abnormal nuclear p53 accumulation and Bcl-2 overexpression were detected in 221/445 (49.6%) and199/437 (45.5%) tumours respectively, with a significant inverse correlation between the two markers (p = 0.023). On univariate analysis no correlations were found between either marker and standard clinico-pathological variables, however nuclear p53 expression was associated with a significantly reduced survival (p = 0.024). Combined analysis of the two markers indicated that 112/432 (24.2%) cases displayed a p53(-)/Bcl-2(+) phenotype, this occurring more frequently in earlier stage tumours. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significant survival advantage in these p53(-)/Bcl-2(+) tumours compared with the remaining cases (p = 0.0032). On multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model, neither p53 expression nor Bcl-2 expression alone were of independent prognostic significance, however the combined p53(-)/Bcl-2(+) phenotype was significantly associated with a good prognosis in this series (HR 0.659, 95%CI 0.452-0.959, p = 0.029). Patient stratification by combined p53 / Bcl-2 phenotype provides stage-independent prognostic information in colorectal cancer. Specifically, that up to a quarter of patients display a good prognosis p53(-)/Bcl-2(+) phenotype. This may indicate a more clinically indolent phenotype and a subset of patients for whom less aggressive adjuvant treatment appropriate.
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology 08/2005; 3(1):47. DOI:10.1186/1477-7819-3-47 · 1.41 Impact Factor

Show more