ZNF143 activates gene expression in response to DNA damage and binds to cisplatin-modified DNA.

Department of Molecular Biology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.
International Journal of Cancer (Impact Factor: 6.2). 11/2004; 111(6):900-9. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.20358
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We have identified a cisplatin-inducible gene, the mitochondrial ribosomal protein S11 (MRP S11) gene, by means of mRNA differential display. Functional analysis of the MRP S11 promoter showed that a Staf binding site in the promoter is required for both basal promoter activity and cisplatin-inducible activity. We also found that Staf binding activity is significantly increased in nuclear extracts from cells treated with cisplatin. ZNF 143 and ZNF 76 are human homologues of the Xenopus transcriptional activator, Staf. ZNF 143 expression is induced by cisplatin but ZNF 76 expression is not. However, ZNF 143 expression is not induced by transplatin, which is clinically ineffective. ZNF143 is an inducible gene by other DNA damaging agents such as gamma-irradiation, etoposide and adriamycin. ZNF 143 also binds preferentially to cisplatin-modified DNA. These results suggest that ZNF 143 participates in cellular responses to DNA damage.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Previously, we reported that the expression of zinc-finger protein 143 (ZNF143) was induced by insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) via reactive oxygen species (ROS)- and phosphatidylinositide-3-kinase (PI3-kinase)-linked pathways in colon cancer cells. Here, we investigated whether GAIP-interacting protein, C-terminus (GIPC), a binding partner of IGF-1R, is involved in ZNF143 expression through IGF-1 and IGF-1R signaling in colon cancer cells. The knockdown of GIPC in colon cancer cells reduced ZNF143 expression in response to IGF-1. IGF-1 signaling through its receptor, leading to the phosphorylation and activation of the PI3-kinase-Akt pathway and mitogenactivated protein kinases (MAPKs) was unaffected by the knockdown of GIPC, indicating the independence of the GIPC-linked pathway from PI3-kinase- and MAPK-linked signaling in IGF-1-induced ZNF143 expression. In accordance with previous results in breast cancer cells (Choi et al., 2010), the knockdown of GIPC reduced ROS production in response to IGF-1 in colon cancer cells. Furthermore, the knockdown of GIPC reduced the expression of Rad51, which is regulated by ZNF143, in response to IGF-1 in colon cancer cells. Taken together, these data suggest that GIPC is involved in IGF-1 signaling leading to ZNF143 expression through the regulation of ROS production, which may play a role for colon cancer tumorigenesis.
    Molecules and Cells 09/2011; 32(5):415-9. · 2.21 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The cell-cycle checkpoint kinase Chk1 is essential in mammalian cells due to its roles in controlling processes such as DNA replication, mitosis and DNA-damage responses. Despite its paramount importance, how Chk1 controls these functions remains unclear, mainly because very few Chk1 substrates have hitherto been identified. Here, we combine a chemical genetics approach with high-resolution mass spectrometry to identify novel Chk1 substrates and their phosphorylation sites. The list of targets produced reveals the potential impact of Chk1 function not only on processes where Chk1 was already known to be involved, but also on other key cellular events such as transcription, RNA splicing and cell fate determination. In addition, we validate and explore the phosphorylation of transcriptional co-repressor KAP1 Ser473 as a novel DNA-damage-induced Chk1 site. By providing a substantial set of potential Chk1 substrates, we present opportunities for studying unanticipated functions for Chk1 in controlling a wide range of cellular processes. We also refine the Chk1 consensus sequence, facilitating the future prediction of Chk1 target sites. In addition, our identification of KAP1 Ser473 phosphorylation as a robust readout for Chk1 activity could be used to explore the in vivo effects of Chk1 inhibitors that are being developed for clinical evaluation.
    Genome biology 08/2011; 12(8):R78. · 10.30 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: DNA is the target of multiple endogenous and exogenous agents generating chemical lesions on the double helix. Cellular DNA damage response pathways rely on a myriad of proteins interacting with DNA alterations. The cartography of this interactome currently includes well known actors of chromatin remodelling, DNA repair or proteins hijacked from their natural functions such as transcription factors. In order to go further into the characterization of these protein networks, proteomics-based methods began to be used in the early 2000s. The strategies are diverse and include mainly (i) damaged DNA molecules used as targets on protein microarrays, (ii) damaged DNA probes used to trap within complex cellular extracts proteins that are then separated and identified by proteomics, (iii) identification of chromatin- bound proteins after a genotoxic stress, or (iv) identification of proteins associated with other proteins already known to be part of DNA damage interactome. All these approaches have already been performed to find new proteins recognizing oxidized bases, abasic sites, strand breaks or crosslinks generated by anticancer drugs such as nitrogen mustards and platinating agents. Identified interactions are generally confirmed using complementary methods such as electromobility shift assays or surface plasmon resonance. These strategies allowed, for example, demonstration of interactions between cisplatin-DNA crosslinks and PARP-1 or the protein complex PTW/PP. The next challenging step will be to understand the biological repercussions of these newly identified interactions which may help to unravel new mechanisms involved in genetic toxicology, discover new cellular responses to anticancer drugs or identify new biomarkers and therapeutic targets.
    Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis 12/2012; · 3.90 Impact Factor