Article

Expression and enzyme activity determination of human cyclooxygenase-1 and -2 in a baculovirus-insect cell system.

Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China.
Acta Pharmacologica Sinica (Impact Factor: 2.35). 09/2004; 25(8):1000-6.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To develop an in vitro intact cell-based assay for screening selective cyclooxygenase inhibitors.
Human cyclooxygenase-1 (hCOX-1) and cyclooxygenase-2 (hCOX-2) genes were cloned from human monocyte cell line THP-1 cells and expressed in Spodoptera frugiperda (sf9) insect cell line by Bac-to-Bac baculovirus expression systems. Infected sf9 cells were harvested 24 h post-infection (hpi), and distributed to a 24-well plate, preincubated with various nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and challenged with 10 mmol/L arachidonic acid; the cyclooxygenase activity was assessed indirectly by prostaglandin E2-specific radioimmunoassay.
Polymerase chain reaction detection demonstrated that hCOX-1 and hCOX-2 were transposed to the bacmid. Western blot analysis showed that infected sf9 cells could express hCOX-1 and hCOX-2 proteins. Radioimmunoassay demonstrated that both recombinant proteins functioned well in sf9 cells.
Human cyclooxygenase-1 and cyclooxygenase-2 were successfully expressed in sf9 insect cell line. It can be utilized for the identification of potent and selective inhibitors of hCOX-1 and/or hCOX-2.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
70 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To screen the selective inhibitors for human cyclooxygenase-2 ((h)COX-2) utilizing molecular simulation. Eight xanthone derivatives, compounds A-H, were employed by the structure-based research methodology. Resveratrol and NS-398 were selected as the control compounds for COX-1 and COX-2, respectively. The docking results were scored and the interaction energies of the complexes were calculated by CHARMm forcefield. NS-398 could not dock into the active site of COX-1. However, resveratrol, the specific selective compound for COX-1, gained lower interaction energy while docked in COX-1. The lower interaction energies were investigated, while compound B and F were docked into the catalytic sites of COX-1 and COX-2, respectively. Compound A, 1,3,6,7-tetrahydroxyxanthone, revealed high inhibitory potency to both COX-1 and COX-2. The conformations of the docking would influence the values of interaction energies. The hydrogen bond could also increase the stability of the whole complex, which might suggest that compound B had a suitable conformation in the tunnel-like active site of COX-1. Compound F, a potent agent for COX-2, revealed a strong hydrogen bond with Ser516 in human COX-2 to form a stable complex.
    Acta Pharmacologica Sinica 01/2008; 28(12):2027-32. · 2.35 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: COXs catalyze the complex conversion of arachidonic acid to prostaglandins and thromboxanes, which trigger as autacoids with autocrine and paracrine biological effects many physiological and pathophysiological responses. The structural similarities of the COX-1 and -2 enzymes make the search for selective inhibitors for COX-2 versus -1 a formidable challenge. AREAS COVERED: The present review provides a survey of the development of novel COX-2 inhibitors covering literature and patents between 2009 and 2010. The presence of a central, typically 1,2-diaryl substituted, heterocycle or carbocycle as a characteristic structural motif in many selective COX-2 inhibitors represents the basis of their classification in this review. The classification in this review includes COX-2 inhibitors based on five- and six-membered heterocycles, benzoheterocycles (e.g., benzopyrans, benzopyranones, indoles and quinolines), quinones, chalcones, natural products and miscellaneous. When available, COX-2 inhibitors are presented with their related COX-2 inhibitory potency and selectivity. EXPERT OPINION: The availability of detailed information on the crystal structure of the COX-2 enzyme with various substrates, cofactors and inhibitors, and the recently reported increased risk of cardiovascular events associated with selective COX-2 inhibitors will further stimulate development of COX-2 inhibitors with favorable COX-2 inhibition profiles without adverse effects to the cardiovascular system.
    Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents 06/2011; 21(9):1339-432. · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the present study, we designed and synthesized a novel 1,5-diarylpyrazole derivative, 2-amino-N-(2-methyl-5-(1-(4-sulfamoylphenyl)-3-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazol-5-yl)phenyl) acetamide hydrochloride (CC06), which was intended to act as a prodrug and would exert potent anti-inflammatory activity after being converted to its parent compound in vivo. In vitro cell-based biological assay, CC06 showed decreased inhibitory effects on cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 and COX-2 compared with its parent compounds, but it exhibited potent anti-inflammatory activity in vivo. The anti-inflammatory effect was evaluated in a carrageenan-induced rat paw edema model and CC06 (15, 30, 60 mg/kg, intragastrically) reduced rat paw edema in a dose-dependent manner. CC06 is also a selective inhibitor of COX-2 since it can reduce prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) production in the inflamed pouch dose-dependently without affecting PGE(2) production in stomach in rat air pouch model. Furthermore, preliminary pharmacokinetics experiments were conducted using high performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS) to detect whether CC06 can convert to its parent compound or not. Our results supported the hypothesis that CC06 was actually converted to its parent compound. These suggested that CC06 served as an anti-inflammatory prodrug and actually converted to its parent compound to exert its anti-inflammatory effect. This finding will be of great benefit in carrying out structural modifications of prodrug-like selective COX-2 inhibitors.
    Biological & Pharmaceutical Bulletin 07/2009; 32(6):1032-6. · 1.85 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
0 Downloads
Available from