Article

Mental health nursing practice in acute psychiatric close-observation areas.

School of Nursing, Family and Community Health, University of Western Sydney, Parramatta Campus, Penrith DC, New South Wales 1797, Australia.
International journal of mental health nursing (Impact Factor: 1.29). 07/2004; 13(2):89-99. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-0979.2004.00324.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The provision of evidence-based therapeutic nursing care in close-observation units or psychiatric intensive care units, has been identified as a problem internationally. These areas of nursing practice have been the subject of considerable discussion particularly in relation to the management of aggression, violence, involuntary treatment, and seclusion. This study used a participatory action research framework to identify qualitative and quantitative measures of activity in the area. Quantitative data collected included rates of critical incidents, the use of prn medication, and the use of seclusion. These data were used as base-line data and were predicted as a measure of change. Qualitative data, collected by interview and focus groups, were used to reveal the experience of patients, relatives, and nurses in a close-observation area. Analysis of this data revealed three main themes: design and environment, lack of activity and structured time, and nursing care. The importance of this study is in demonstrating the multiple problems that exist in the provision of care in close-observation areas and the corresponding need for fundamental changes.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
117 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose – Therapeutic relationships have been identified to be a key feature of staff working with patients within mental health settings and are widely referred to within research literature. The aim of this study is to explore the experiences of support staff within secure mental health services with regards to the formation and development of therapeutic relationships with patients. Design/methodology/approach – Ten participants were interviewed, all of whom were unqualified support staff based within secure establishments and working directly with patients. Findings – Interpretative phenomenological analysis of the data resulted in the identification of three themes: “Building bridges”: developing relationships with patients; “You do forget what they've done”: seeing the person and managing risk, and “Playing your cards close to our chest”: maintaining boundaries. Originality/value – The themes are discussed and evaluated in terms of relationship formation and development, barriers that may prevent such relationships from being built and the implications for clinical practice.
    British Journal of Forensic Practice 05/2012; 14(2):104-115.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Conflicting medication information has been defined as contradictory information about a medication topic from two or more sources. The objective of this study was to determine whether arthritis patients are exposed to conflicting medication information, to document sources of conflicting information, and to explore whether conflicting information is associated with sociodemographic factors, clinical characteristics, and medication adherence. Using an online survey, arthritis patients (N = 328) reported how often they received conflicting information about 12 medication topics as well as sources of conflicting information, demographic/clinical characteristics, and medication adherence. A linear regression model, which controlled for various demographic/clinical factors, determined whether conflicting information was associated with medication adherence. The majority of patients (80.1%) received conflicting information and were most likely to receive conflicting information about medication risks. Physicians, media sources, and the Internet were the most common sources of conflicting information. Less conflicting information (B = -0.13, p < .05), more information source use (B = 0.22, p < .01), and lower perceived regimen complexity (B = -0.17, p < .05) were associated with better medication adherence. In conclusion, conflicting medication information is pervasive, comes from a variety of sources, and may negatively affect patient health outcomes. To potentially decrease exposure to conflicting information, providers should direct patients to high-quality medication information sources.
    Journal of Health Communication 09/2013; · 1.61 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: ACCESSIBLE SUMMARY: • An extensive review of empirical literature (n = 39) on patient and staff perceptions of seclusion in psychiatric inpatient settings was undertaken. • Patients perceived seclusion negatively while staff perceived it to be therapeutic and vital for the running of inpatient units. • Better communication, more contact with patients and staff engaging with patients before during and after a seclusion episode were suggestions for improvements to care processes. ABSTRACT: This review explores patient and staff perceptions and improvement suggestions regarding seclusion in psychiatric inpatient settings. After an extensive literature search, 39 empirical papers were included in the review. According to the literature, patients perceived seclusion to be a distinct negative incident. Staff thought seclusion had a therapeutic effect and believed that units could not operate effectively without seclusion, but regretted that the situation was not resolved differently. Staff and patients had suggestions to improve the seclusion experience. Common themes in relation to the implications for practice are the need for better communication and more contact between patients and staff before, during and after the seclusion event.
    Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 07/2012; · 0.80 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
776 Downloads
Available from
Jun 5, 2014