Caring for patients in a malpractice crisis: Physician satisfaction and quality of care

Columbia University, New York, New York, United States
Health Affairs (Impact Factor: 4.32). 07/2004; 23(4):42-53. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.4.42
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The rhetoric of malpractice reform is at fever pitch, but political advocacy does not necessarily reflect grassroots opinion. To determine whether the ongoing liability crisis has greatly reduced physicians' professional satisfaction, we surveyed specialist physicians in Pennsylvania. We found widespread discontent among physicians practicing in high-liability environments, which seems to be compounded by other financial and administrative pressures. Opinion alone should not determine public policy, but physicians' perceptions matter for two reasons. First, perceptions influence behavior with respect to practice environment and clinical decision making. Second, perceptions influence the physician-patient relationship and the interpersonal quality of care.


Available from: Catherine M Desroches, Jun 15, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Medical services for pregnancy and childbirth are inherently risky and unpredictable. In many states, obstetrician-gynecologists (OB-GYNS) who attend the majority of childbirths in the United States and provide the most clinically complex obstetric procedures are struggling with increasing malpractice insurance premiums and litigation risk. Despite its significant implications for patient care, the potential impact of malpractice burden on OB-GYN physicians' career satisfaction has not been rigorously tested in previous research. Drawing on data from a statewide survey of obstetric providers in Michigan, this paper examined the association between medical liability burden and OB-GYNs' career satisfaction. Malpractice insurance premiums and malpractice claims experience were used as 2 objective measures for medical liability burden. Descriptive statistics were calculated and multivariable logistic regressions estimated for data analysis. Although most respondents reported satisfaction with their overall career in medicine, 43.7% had become less satisfied over the last 5 years and 34.0% would not recommend obstetrics/gynecology to students seeking career advice. Multivariable regression analysis showed that compared to coverage through an employer, paying > or =$50,000/year for liability insurance premium was associated with lower career satisfaction among OB-GYNs (odds ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.93). We found no significant impact of malpractice claims experience, including both recent malpractice claims (during the last 5 years [2001--2006]) and earlier malpractice claims (>5 years ago), on overall career satisfaction. The findings of this study suggest that high malpractice premiums negatively affect OB-GYN physicians' career satisfaction. The impact of the current medical liability climate on quality of care for pregnant women warrants further investigation.
    Women s Health Issues 07/2008; 18(4):229-37. DOI:10.1016/j.whi.2008.02.007 · 1.61 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Dit proefschrift behandelt medische aansprakelijkheid als systeem en analyseert hoe het werkt en of het zijn toegemeten functies ook realiseert.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The main goal of this research is to explore the organizational climate perceived by administrative and healthcare personnel working in Spanish healthcare services, analyzing the differences according to their health specialization, sex, age and professional status. The sample was made up of 3,787 individuals working in the administrative and healthcare services of the Public Health System of the Principality of Asturias, 88.7% were working in specialist care and 11.3% in primary care. Mean age was 51.88 (standard deviation of 6.28); 79.9% were women and 20.1% men. The organizational climate was assessed with the CLIOR scale. The organizational climate perceived is moderately positive, with a global mean of 3.03 on a scale of 1 to 5 points. The differences are statistically significant (p < .01) according to specialty, age and profession. A better working climate is perceived in primary care than in specialist care, and among older as compared to younger workers. The results indicate that the working climate perceived by administration and services staff employees in the Spanish healthcare context is moderately positive, with a better perceived climate in primary care than in specialist care. Resumen El objetivo de este trabajo es conocer el clima organizacional percibido por los tra-bajadores de administración y servicios del sistema español de salud pública, analizando su es-pecialidad sanitaria, género, edad y categoría profesional. La muestra estuvo compuesta por 3.787 trabajadores de administración y servicios del Servicio de Salud Pública de Asturias, 88,7% procedían de atención especializada y 11,3% de atención primaria. La media de edad es de 51,88 años (desviación típica 6,28); 79,9% fueron mujeres y 20,1% hombres. El clima organi-zacional se evaluó mediante la escala CLIOR, obteniéndose una media de 3,03 en una escala de... PALABRAS CLAVE Satisfacción laboral; Personal sanitario; Salud pública; Estudio descriptivo mediante encuesta
    International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology 04/2014; 14(14):102-110. DOI:10.1016/S1697-2600(14)70043-2 · 2.79 Impact Factor