Persistent area socioeconomic disparities in U.S. incidence of cervical cancer, mortality, stage, and survival, 1975–2000

Surveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-8316, USA.
Cancer (Impact Factor: 4.9). 09/2004; 101(5):1051-7. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20467
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Temporal cervical cancer incidence and mortality patterns and ethnic disparities in patient survival and stage at diagnosis in relation to socioeconomic deprivation measures have not been well studied in the United States. The current article analyzed temporal area socioeconomic inequalities in U.S. cervical cancer incidence, mortality, stage, and survival.
County and census tract poverty and education variables from the 1990 census were linked to U.S. mortality and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer incidence data from 1975 to 2000. Age-adjusted incidence and mortality rates and 5-year cause-specific survival rates were calculated for each socioeconomic group and differences in rates were tested for statistical significance at the 0.05 level.
Substantial area socioeconomic gradients in both incidence and mortality were observed, with inequalities in cervical cancer persisting against a backdrop of declining rates. Cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates increased with increasing poverty and decreasing education levels for the total population as well as for non-Hispanic white, black, American Indian, Asian/Pacific Islander, and Hispanic women. Patients in lower socioeconomic census tracts had significantly higher rates of late-stage cancer diagnosis and lower rates of cancer survival. Even after controlling for stage, significant differences in survival remained. The 5-year survival rate among women diagnosed with distant-stage cervical cancer was approximately 30% lower in low than in high socioeconomic census tracts.
Census-based socioeconomic measures such as area poverty and education levels could serve as important surveillance tools for monitoring temporal trends in cancer-related health inequalities and targeting interventions.


Available from: Ben Hankey, Jan 27, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite comparable screening rates for precancerous lesions, higher incidence and mortality related to cervical cancer in minority women persists. Recent evidence suggests that minority women with precancerous cervical lesions harbor a wider range of human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes, many of these distinct from HPV16/18, those most commonly found in Caucasian women. The goal of the analysis was to determine if inflammatory cytokines and chemokines varied by HPV 16/18 versus other genotypes in cervical cancer tissues from Tanzanian women. HPV genotypes and concentrations of chemokines and cytokines were measured from homogenized fresh tumor tissue of thirty-one women with invasive cervical cancer (ICC). Risk factors for cervical cancer including age, parity, hormonal contraceptive use and cigarette smoking were obtained by questionnaire. Generalized linear models were used to evaluate differences between chemokines/cytokine levels in women infected with HPV16/18 and those infected with other HPV genotypes. After adjusting for age, parity and hormonal contraceptives, IL-17 was found significantly more frequently in invasive cervical cancer samples of women infected with HPV16/18 compared to women infected with other HPV genotypes (p = 0.033). In contrast, higher levels for granular macrophage colony-stimulating factor (p = 0.004), IL-10 (p = 0.037), and IL-15 (p = 0.041) were found in ICC tissues of women infected with genotypes other than HPV16/18 when compared to those of women infected with HPV16/18. While the small sample size limits inference, our data suggest that infection with different HPV genotypes is associated with distinct pro-inflammatory cytokine expression profiles; whether this explains some of the racial differences observed in cervical cancer is still unclear. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings.
    Infectious Agents and Cancer 03/2015; 10(1). DOI:10.1186/s13027-015-0005-1 · 2.07 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To assess the understanding of the term 'Pap smear' among women across the entire adult lifespan after recent changes to the guidelines on cervical cancer screening. Women attending the Obstetrics and Gynecology clinic at a large safety net teaching hospital in a Midwestern city were provided one of two versions of a confidential and anonymous survey to complete. The difference between the two versions was the way the primary research question was worded. There were 174 participants ranging in age from 15 to 69 (mean = 33.9) years. Of the 73 women who completed version A of the survey, 74 % were able to identify at least one correct descriptor for the term 'Pap smear.' Women who could identify at least one correct descriptor for the term 'Pap smear' were on average older than those who could not (mean = 36.9 vs. 28.7 years; p = 0.012). Of the 94 patients completing survey version B, 67 % could not differentiate a pelvic exam from a Pap smear. There was no association between age and ability to differentiate a pelvic exam from a Pap smear. The majority of women cannot distinguish a Pap smear from a pelvic exam. The unexpected finding of less understanding among younger women prompts a need for further research and invites discussion of whether more cervical cancer prevention education, with more emphasis on HPV vaccines in recent years, has neglected the importance of Pap smears-which is beginning to show up in knowledge of younger women. Both these findings suggest a need for increased patient education during female preventive health clinic visits.
    Maternal and Child Health Journal 01/2015; DOI:10.1007/s10995-015-1679-0 · 2.24 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A better understanding about the factors associated with cervical cancer survival disparities is an important step in developing more effective cervical cancer intervention strategies. This study investigates cervical cancer survival disparities from three different perspectives based on data from the Texas Cancer Registry from 1995 to 2005. These perspectives are race/ethnicity, area socioeconomic status (SES), and geographic locations. We examined the role of both individual- and contextual-level factors in cervical cancer survival disparities using a multilevel survival analysis. Individual-level factors included race/ethnicity, age at diagnosis, year of diagnosis, tumor grade, stage at diagnosis, and type of treatment received. Contextual-level factors are census-tract-level variables, including demographic characteristics, health insurance expenditure, behavioral factors, extent of urbanization, and spatial access to primary care physicians. This study reveals that African-Americans had a higher mortality risk (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.03-1.38) especially if stage was unknown (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.08-2.75) compared with non-Hispanic whites. Among women diagnosed at regional or distant stage, Hispanics had a survival advantage over their non-Hispanic white counterparts (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69-0.94). We also identified geographic areas where longer-than-expected or shorter-than-expected cervical cancer survival was statistically significant. Only a small portion of these disparities were explained by individual- and contextual-level factors. This study suggests that Race/Ethnicity, SES, and geography are associated with cervical cancer survival in Texas.
    Applied Geography 01/2015; 56:21-28. DOI:10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.10.004 · 3.08 Impact Factor