Article

Efficacy of sertraline in a 12-week trial for generalized anxiety disorder

University of Oslo, Kristiania (historical), Oslo, Norway
American Journal of Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 13.56). 10/2004; 161(9):1642-9. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.9.1642
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Sertraline's efficacy and tolerability in treating generalized anxiety disorder were evaluated.
Adult outpatients with DSM-IV generalized anxiety disorder and a total score of 18 or higher on the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale were eligible. After a 1-week single-blind placebo lead-in, patients were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with placebo (N=188, mean baseline anxiety score=25) or flexible doses (50-150 mg/day) of sertraline (N=182, mean anxiety score=25). The primary outcome measure was baseline-to-endpoint change in the Hamilton anxiety scale total score. A secondary efficacy measure was the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) improvement score; response was defined as a score of 2 or less.
Sertraline patients had significantly greater improvement than placebo patients on all efficacy measures at week 4. Analysis of covariance of the intent-to-treat group at endpoint (with the last observation carried forward) showed a significant difference in the decrease from baseline of the least-square mean total score on the Hamilton anxiety scale between sertraline (mean=11.7) and placebo (mean=8.0). Significantly greater endpoint improvement with sertraline than placebo was obtained for mean scores on the Hamilton anxiety scale psychic factor (6.7 versus 4.1) and somatic factor (5.0 versus 3.9). The rate of responders, based on CGI improvement and last observation carried forward, was significantly higher for sertraline (63%) than placebo (37%). Sertraline was well tolerated; 8% of patients versus 10% for placebo dropped out because of adverse events.
Sertraline appears to be efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder.

0 Followers
 · 
110 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is a prevalent and impairing disorder, associated with extensive psychiatric and medical comorbidity and usually characterized by a chronic course. Different drugs have been investigated in GAD; among them are the following: 1) SSRIs: paroxetine, sertraline, fluvoxamine and escitalopram; 2) SNRI1s: venlafaxine; 3) benzodiazepines (BZs): alprazolam, diazepam and lorazepam; 4) azapirones (AZAs): buspirone; 5) antihistamines (AHs): hydroxyzine; 6) pregabalin (PGB); and 7) complementary/alternative medicine (CAM): kava-kava and homeopathic preparation. We conducted an effect size (ES) analysis of 21 double-blind placebo-controlled trials of medications treating DSM-III-R, DSM-IV or ICD-10 GAD using HAM-A change in score from baseline or endpoint score as the main efficacy measure. Literature search was performed using MEDLINE and PsycINFO databases including articles published between 1987 and 2003 and personal communications with investigators and sponsors. comparing all drugs versus placebo, the ES was 0.39. Mean ESs, excluding children, were PGB: 0.50, AH: 0.45, SNRI: 0.42, BZ: 0.38, SSRI: 0.36, AZA: 0.17 and CAM: -0.31. Comparing ES for adults versus children/adolescents (excluding CAM) and conventional drugs versus CAM (excluding children/adolescents) we found significantly higher ES for children/adolescents and for conventional drugs (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively). No significant differences were found when comparing date of publication, location of site (i.e. US versus other), fixed versus flexible dosing, number of study arms, or number of outcome measures used. Medications varied in the magnitude of their ES, ranging from moderate to poor. Adolescents and children showed a much greater ES compared with adults. Subjects taking CAM had worse outcomes than placebo.
    Journal of Psychopharmacology 11/2007; 21(8):864-72. DOI:10.1177/0269881107076996 · 2.81 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: In this study, we aimed to determine the changes in quality of life of children/adolescents with anxiety disorders during six months of sertraline treatment, to investigate parent-child/adolescent concordance in perception of quality of life and to examine the effect of treatment on children/adolescents. Methods: In this study, 30 patients with anxiety disorders according to criteria specified in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th. Edition (DSM-IV) were assigned to sertraline treatment. The patients were evaluated using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children, Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) and the Children’s Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) at 0th, 2nd and 6th months. Results: PedsQL total scores increased significantly with the treatment in children and adolescents (p<0.001), however, no differences were observed in parent proxy report (p=0.326). The mean CGAS score was 59.85±7.73 at the beginning of treatment and 73.70±7.01 at the end of treatment (p<0.001). The average CGI score decreased from 4.68±0.96 to 2.27±0.84. Conclusion: It was observed that perception of quality of life in children and adolescents with anxiety disorders increased with the treatment.
    Noropsikiyatri Arsivi 01/2014; 51(1):30-39. DOI:10.4274/npa.y6565 · 0.13 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To describe the course and outcome of patients with prospectively defined chronic mania and to identify predictors of treatment non-response. EMBLEM is a 2-year prospective, observational study of bipolar disorder treatment outcomes conducted in 14 European countries. Patients with a manic/mixed episode were assessed and prospectively followed for 1 year. Clinical scales (Clinical Global Impressions-Bipolar Disorder (CGI-BP) overall, mania, and depression; Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS); and five-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D-5)) and medication taken were systemically recorded. Treatment adherence and outcome measures were also captured. Chronic mania (non-response) was defined as not achieving more than one point improvement on CGI-BP mania scale during up to 12-month follow-up. The analysis was conducted with 3373 patients who had at least two CGI-BP mania ratings available. A total of 15% of patients fulfilled criteria for chronic mania. Compared to those who responded to treatment, chronic mania was associated with lower severity of mania symptoms at baseline (OR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.37-0.52), shorter duration of current episode before treatment start (OR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.52-0.96), more delusions/hallucinations at baseline (OR = 1.12, 95% CI 1.03-1.22), less socially active (OR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.39-0.70) and greater occupational impairment (OR = 1.54, 95% CI 1.01-2.35) by multivariate statistical analysis. Rather than severity or duration of manic symptoms, factors associated with chronicity in mania are the presence of psychotic symptoms and issues related to social and occupational functioning.
    The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry 02/2008; 9(4):313-20. DOI:10.1080/15622970701805491 · 4.23 Impact Factor