Experimentally induced arousals during sleep: A cross-modality matching paradigm

Facultés des médecine and médecine dentaire, Université de Montrèal, Montrèal, Canada.
Journal of Sleep Research (Impact Factor: 3.35). 10/2004; 13(3):229-38. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2004.00409.x
Source: PubMed


Micro-arousals occur spontaneously or in response to exogenous and endogenous sensory input during sleep. The function of micro-arousals remains unclear, for example, whether it reflects a disturbance or a preparatory response to environmental changes. The goal of this study was to assess arousal responsiveness when two types of sensory stimulations were used: auditory (AD) alone and the addition of a vibrotactile (VT) sensation. Ten normal sleepers participated in three nights of polygraphic recordings. The first night was for habituation and to rule out sleep disorders, and the second to collect baseline sleep data. During the third night, AD and VT + AD stimuli, with three levels of intensities for auditory and vibratory signals, were randomly given to induce arousal responses in sleep stages 2, 3 and 4 and rapid eye movement (REM). The frequency of the arousal responses increased with stimulus intensity for all sleep stages and was lowest in stages 3 and 4. In non-REM (NREM) sleep, combined VT + AD stimulation induced more frequent and more intense arousal responses than AD alone. In REM sleep, more frequent micro-arousals rather than awakenings were triggered by combined stimulations. In stage 2, the response rate of total induced K-complexes did not differ between both types of stimulations while more K-complexes followed by arousals were evoked by the combined VT + AD stimulation than by the AD alone. The induced arousals were associated with an increase in heart rate in all sleep stages. An increase in suprahyoid muscle tone was observed in NREM sleep only, REM being not associated with a rise in muscle tone following experimental stimulation. Most leg and body movements occurred in response to induced awakenings. These results suggest that the cross-modality sensory stimuli triggered more arousal responses in comparison with single-modality stimuli. In an attempt to wake a sleeping subject, the addition of a tactile stimulation, such as shaking the shoulder, is an effective strategy that increases the arousal probability.

Download full-text


Available from: Takafumi Kato,
    • "n ¼ 35 40e59 M-17 F-18 377.6 ± 10.5 Normal sleep patterns Yes Controls only (Home) Roky et al. 2001 1999 n ¼ 8 2 0 e28 M-8 422 ± 9 Normal sleep patterns Yes Baseline data only Means et al. 2003 2002 n ¼ 49 55.4 M-27 F-22 376.9 ± 46.5 (Home) 452.0 ± 63.3 Yes Disregarded insomnia patient data 371.2 ± 41.2 (Lab) 430.7 ± 45.8 Kato et al. 2004 2003 n ¼ 10 24.6 M-4 F-6 452 ± 17 Normal sleep patterns Yes Baseline data only Penev 2007 2006 n ¼ 12 68.9 M-12 383 ± 58 436 Yes Carrier et al. 2007 2006 n ¼ 17 37.2 M-7 F-10 426.1 ± 16 504 Not stated Placebo data only Peters et al. 2008 2007 n ¼ 28 20.14 M-7 F "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The common assumption that population sleep duration has declined in the past few decades has not been supported by recent reviews, which have been limited to self-reported data. The aim of this review was to assess whether there has been a reduction in objectively recorded sleep duration over the last 50+ years. The literature was searched for studies published from 1960 to 2013, which assessed objective sleep duration (total sleep time (TST)) in healthy normal-sleeping adults. The search found 168 studies that met inclusion criteria, with 257 data points representing 6052 individuals ages 18-88 y. Data were assessed by comparing the regression lines of age vs. TST in studies conducted between 1960 and 1989 vs. 1990-2013. Weighted regression analyses assessed the association of year of study with age-adjusted TST across all data points. Regression analyses also assessed the association of year of study with TST separately for 10-y age categories (e.g., ages 18-27 y), and separately for polysomnographic and actigraphic data, and for studies involving a fixed sleep schedule and participants' customary sleep schedules. Analyses revealed no significant association of sleep duration with study year. The results are consistent with recent reviews of subjective data, which have challenged the notion of a modern epidemic of insufficient sleep.
    Sleep Medicine Reviews 08/2015; 28. DOI:10.1016/j.smrv.2015.08.004 · 8.51 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Increased activity of the autonomic nervous system [65] and cortisol causes alertness. Increased ACT influences awakening. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to review potential, physiological, hormonal and neuronal mechanisms that may mediate the sleep changes. This paper investigates the literatures regarding the activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, one of the main neuroendocrine stress systems during sleep in order to identify relations between stress and sleep disorder and the treatment of stress-induced insomnia. Sleep and wakefulness are regulated by the aminergic, cholinergic brainstem and hypothalamic systems. Activation of the HPA and/or the sympathetic nervous systems results in wakefulness and these hormones including corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), cortisol or corticosterone, noradrenaline, and adrenaline, are associated with attention and arousal. Stress-related insomnia leads to a vicious circle by activating the HPA system. An awareness of the close interaction between sleep and stress systems is emerging and the hypothalamus is now recognized as a key center for sleep regulation, with hypothalamic neurontransmitter systems providing the framework for therapeutic advances. An updated understanding of these systems may allow researchers to elucidate neural mechanisms of sleep disorder and to develop effective intervention for sleep disorder.
    12/2012; 21(4):141-50. DOI:10.5607/en.2012.21.4.141
  • Source
    • "Sleep propensity also affects the occurrence of cortical arousals as suggested by reduction in MA density after total or partial sleep deprivation (De Gennaro et al., 2001). Therefore, we can say that as a consequence of integration of homeostatic and circadian mechanisms (Halasz, 1993) acting on arousal systems, sleep stage (Bonnet and Arand, 1997), sleep pressure (Parrino et al., 1993; De Gennaro et al., 2001), type (Kato et al., 2004) and intensity of sensory stimuli (Halasz, 1993; Williams et al., 1964) affect arousal responsiveness and arousal threshold. Moreover, since polysomnography itself represents an external stimulus, a ''first night effect " may be present in experimental studies inducing not only reduced total sleep time and lower sleep efficiency but also rise in AR density (Agnew et al., 1966; Le Bon et al., 2001). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Several factors, such as homeostatic and circadian influences, may affect the density of cortical and subcortical arousals (AR). The purpose of this study was to examine the time-of-night and the first night effect on AR response. AR were classified into microarousals (MA), phases of transitory activation (PAT), delta (D-burst) and K-complex burst (K-burst). The AR density and duration was analyzed during two consecutive nights with the analysis of sleep stage and sleep cycle in thirty-six healthy subjects. D- and K-burst showed a trend toward progressive decline across sleep cycles (p<0.0001). While MA rate was unaffected throughout sleep cycles, PAT index increased across the night (p=0.002). The density and duration of each group of AR exhibited reproducibility without significant differences between nights. An individual inter-night variability in AR density was found independently of night and sleep structure. While homeostatic and circadian influences affect nighttime subcortical and MA responses, a wakefulness drive modulates the occurrence of AR with movements. Although the pattern of AR responses was highly reliable from the first to second night, the substantial inter-individual variability suggests the existence of an individual susceptibility. The first night effect on arousal response is affected by individual susceptibility and circadian and homeostatic influences.
    Clinical Neurophysiology 07/2008; 119(7):1590-9. DOI:10.1016/j.clinph.2008.03.010 · 3.10 Impact Factor
Show more