Article

Relationship between antipsychotic medication treatment and new cases of diabetes among psychiatric inpatients

Nathan Kline Institute, Orangeburg, New York, United States
Psychiatric Services (Impact Factor: 1.99). 10/2004; 55(9):1006-13. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.55.9.1006
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study examined data on patients with serious and persistent mental illness in a large state hospital system to determine whether patients who took second-generation antipsychotics were more likely to develop diabetes mellitus than patients who took first-generation antipsychotics.
A case-control study design was used. A new prescription of an antidiabetic medication was used to identify new cases of diabetes mellitus. Odds ratios were calculated for exposure to second-generation antipsychotics (clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, and multiple second-generation antipsychotics) compared with exposure to first-generation antipsychotics. Cases and controls were identified by using a database that contained drug prescription information from the inpatient facilities that were operated by the New York State Office of Mental Health. Data from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2002, were examined. Among 13,611 unique patients who received antipsychotics, 8,461 met entry criteria of being hospitalized for at least 60 days and not having an antidiabetic medication prescribed in the past. A total of 181 of these inpatients received prescriptions for an antidiabetic medication at least 30 days after their admission. Eight controls (N=1,448) for each case (N=181) were matched by calendar year, length of observation period, race, age group, and diagnosis, giving a total sample of 1,629 patients.
Statistically significant elevations in risk were seen among patients who received more than one second-generation antipsychotic or clozapine or quetiapine, compared with patients who received first-generation antipsychotics alone. Although not statistically significant, odds ratios for olanzapine and risperidone were also elevated. Conditional logistic regression adjusting for gender and age did not change the results.
Exposure to multiple second-generation antipsychotics or clozapine or quetiapine significantly increased the risk of treatment-emergent diabetes mellitus.

Full-text

Available from: Leslie Citrome, Jun 08, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
191 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is no conclusive evidence that either high doses or combinations of antipsychotics are more effective than standard doses or monotherapy alone. Nonetheless, prescription of both remains prevalent in the UK. In 2006 the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (SLAM) participated in a national survey of prescription of antipsychotic medications, organized by the Prescribing Observatory for Mental Health. Over half of the patients on SLAM inpatient or psychiatric intensive care units were prescribed a high-dose antipsychotic or a combination of antipsychotics. Prescribing high-dose antipsychotics and polypharmacy in SLAM was found to be among the highest in the UK. To assess the impact of a 6-year quality improvement programme aimed at reducing the rates of prescribing high-dose antipsychotics and polypharmacy on SLAM inpatients and psychiatric intensive care units. There was a significant reduction between baseline and final survey in the rates of prescription of both high-dose antipsychotics and polypharmacy on SLAM inpatients and intensive care units (58% versus 10% p < 0.0001 and 57% versus 16%, p < 0.0001 respectively). The proportion of patients at final survey prescribed a high-dose antipsychotic and a combination was substantially lower in SLAM than in the national sample (10% versus 28%, p < 0.0001 and 16% versus 38%, p < 0.0001 respectively). A sustained change in the prescribing culture of an organization can be achieved through a targeted improvement programme.
    Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology 02/2015; 5(1):4-12. DOI:10.1177/2045125314558054 · 1.53 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In dieser Übersichtsarbeit diskutieren wir, ob es geschlechtsspezifische Unterschiede im Nebenwirkungsprofil von Antipsychotika (AP) der 2. Generation gibt. Die Ergebnisse stützen sich auf eine Medline-Suche für die Jahre 1974 bis Dezember 2005. Obwohl sich Frauen und Männer in ihrer Pharmakokinetik unterscheiden, wurden höhere Plasmaspiegel bei Frauen bisher nur für Clozapin und Olanzapin nachgewiesen. Eine Hyperprolaktinämie, die besonders unter Risperidon und Amisulprid gefunden wird, ist bei Frauen im Vergleich zu Männern stärker ausgeprägt. Die meisten Studien zeigen, dass Clozapin und Olanzapin mit der stärksten Gewichtszunahme einhergehen und dass diese bei Frauen tendenziell stärker ist. Die wenigen Studien, die es gibt, geben weiter eine höhere Prävalenz des metabolischen Syndroms bei Frauen an. Für die neueren AP gibt es sehr wahrscheinlich keine geschlechtsspezifischen Unterschiede in der Häufigkeit und Schwere von akuten oder chronischen Bewegungsstörungen. Frauen besitzen hingegen ein erhöhtes Risiko einer Störung der kardialen Repolarisation (QT-Verlängerung) mit der Gefahr von Torsades-de-Pointes-Arrhythmien unter antipsychotischer Therapie. Zusammenfassend finden sich zwar deutliche Hinweise auf geschlechtsspezifische Unterschiede im Nebenwirkungsprofil der neueren AP, doch gerade in der Beurteilung etwaiger klinischer Konsequenzen bleibt vieles zurzeit noch spekulativ. Wir benötigen prospektive Studien, die geschlechtsspezifische Aspekte als primäre Untersuchungsparameter haben, um die Bedeutung dieser Unterschiede für die Behandlung von Frauen verlässlich abschätzen zu können.
    Der Nervenarzt 01/2007; 78(1). · 0.86 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The term antipsychotic polypharmacy (APP) refers to the concurrent use of two or more antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia. The aim of this study was to investigate the range of APP in schizophrenic patients discharged from psychiatric units in Poland, and to determine its demographical and clinical correlates.
    Pharmacological reports: PR 08/2014; 66(4):613-7. DOI:10.1016/j.pharep.2014.02.024 · 2.17 Impact Factor