Relation between online "hit counts" and subsequent citations: Prospective study of research papers in the BMJ

Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Geneva, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
BMJ (online) (Impact Factor: 17.45). 10/2004; 329(7465):546-7. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.329.7465.546
Source: PubMed

Full-text preview

Available from:
  • Source
    • "ResearchGate. Perneger (2004) found a weak correlation with citations. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Scientometrics is the study of the quantitative aspects of the process of science as a communication system. It is centrally, but not only, concerned with the analysis of citations in the academic literature. In recent years it has come to play a major role in the measurement and evaluation of research performance. In this review we consider: the historical development of scientometrics, sources of citation data, citation metrics and the "laws" of scientometrics, normalisation, journal impact factors and other journal metrics, visualising and mapping science, evaluation and policy, and future developments.
    European Journal of Operational Research 04/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.04.002 · 2.36 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Nowadays, more and more scientific publishers have the willingness to provide article-level metrics data to public. Researchers have made good tries to explore the relationship between the article usage and citation, strong correlation between the number of downloads and citation frequencies is identified and download counts can be used as early performance indicators of subsequent academic impact for papers (Brody, Harnad, & Carr, 2006; Harnad & Brody, 2004; Perneger, 2004; Schloegl & Gorraiz, 2010). However, in these previous studies, only the total downloaded time, which could be called static usage data, is used to make the analysis. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: How does the published scientific literature used by scientific community? Many previous studies make analysis on the static usage data. In this research, we propose the concept of dynamic usage data. Based on the platform of, we have been monitoring and recording the dynamic usage data of Scientometrics articles round the clock. Our analysis find that papers published in recent four years have many more downloads than papers published four years ago. According to our quantitative calculation, papers downloaded on one day have an average lifetime of 4.1 years approximately. Classic papers are still being downloaded frequently even long after their publication. Additionally, we find that social media may reboot the attention of old scientific literature in a short time.
    Journal of Informetrics 07/2014; 8(3):562-568. DOI:10.1016/j.joi.2014.04.009 · 4.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "A single parameter index that uses only the number of citations cannot control biases arising from various factors other than evaluation elements. In cohort study, Perneger (2004) reports that the number of citations can be predicted based on the length and study design of an article. Tsay (1988) reveals that the half-life of a journal's citation is related to its publication frequency, journal age, language and country of publication, and subject category. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study describes the development process of Kor-Factor, which is a novel composite evaluation index that was developed to promote Korean domestic academic journals. As more data accumulate, the Kor-Factor’s optimization process was modified in an attempt to address possible drawbacks of the original form; the result is presented in this study. This study compares Kor-Factor with the Impact Factor, which is the most well-known single element evaluation index. We found that Kor-Factor demonstrates a better power of differentiation and a greater capacity to reflect the reputability of key journals. The modified Kor-Factor, which has been developed through an optimization process, reveals a greater power of differentiation than the original Kor-Factor; however, the modified version has less capacity to reflect reputability. The evaluation elements of the modified Kor-Factor are better and are more evenly reflected on the index value than those of the original version. Finally, we propose the establishment of an appropriate data measurement period for the actual application of the index.
    Scientometrics 07/2011; 88(1):61-71. DOI:10.1007/s11192-011-0384-z · 2.18 Impact Factor
Show more