Article

Preservation of venous valve function after catheter-directed and systemic thrombolysis for deep venous thrombosis.

Division of Emergency Care, Department of Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, PL 340, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland.
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (Impact Factor: 3.07). 11/2004; 28(4):391-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.06.007
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The aim of the study was to assess venous reflux and the obstruction pattern after catheter-directed and systemic thrombolysis of deep iliofemoral venous thrombosis.
Thirty-two patients treated either with systemic (16) or catheter-directed local thrombolysis (16) for massive iliofemoral thrombosis were identified from the hospital registry.
Clinical evaluation at follow up was based on the CEAP classification and disability score. Reflux was assessed by colour duplex ultrasonography and standardised reflux testing. A vascular surgeon blinded to treatment established the clinical status of the lower limb following the previous DVT.
Valvular competence was preserved in 44% of patients treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis compared with 13% of those treated with systemic thrombolysis (p=0.049, Chi squared). Reflux in any deep vein was present in 44% of patients treated by catheter-directed lysis compared with 81% of patients receiving systemic thrombolysis (p=0.03, Chi squared). Reflux in any superficial vein was observed in 25% vs. 63% of the patients, respectively (p=0.03, Chi squared). There were significantly more patients with venous insufficiency of classes C0-1 in the group treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis.
In this clinical series venous valvular function was better preserved after iliofemoral DVT when treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
68 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Treatment guidelines for thrombolysis in iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT) are based on a limited number of observational and prospective studies. The Acute Venous Thrombosis: Thrombus Removal With Adjunctive Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis (ATTRACT) trial will be the first large, multi-center randomized control trial to evaluate the relative advantages of several current treatment strategies. To summarize the existing data that inform the use of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) or pharmacomechanical thrombectomy in the management of acute iliofemoral DVT. A search of the current literature was done using PubMed, Ovid and Cochrane databases for all available articles published to December 2013. Of those studies which included at least 25 patients, 19 case series' were identified from 1996-2012. Treatment groups included anticoagulation, surgical thrombectomy, pharmacomechanical thrombectomy and CDT. Cases observed in each ranged from 26 to101. Three studies were identified which derived data from national multicenter registries. Only 2 randomized control trials were identified from 2002 and 2012. Both support the use of CDT over anticoagulation alone for treatment of iliofemoral DVT. Conclusions Current treatment guidelines for acute iliofemoral DVT have been in flux and are derived from a relatively small amount of clinical data. They are summarized here in anticipation of results from the ongoing ATTRACT trial.
    Annals of Vascular Surgery 01/2014; · 1.03 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate the technical feasibility and safety of percutaneous endovascular thrombolysis for extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in children < 24 months old.
    Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR 06/2014; · 1.81 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective Pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (PMT) and catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) are commonly used for the treatment of iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT). The purpose of this study was to examine the short- and long-term venous patency and venous valvular function as well as clinical outcomes of patients treated for iliofemoral DVT by PMT and CDT. Methods A retrospective review of all patients with symptomatic DVT treated between 2006 and 2011 with PMT or CDT was performed. All patients were treated by local tissue plasminogen activator delivered with PMT or CDT. Patients were divided into two groups on the basis of initial treatment modality: patients treated by PMT alone (group 1), and those who underwent PMT and CDT or CDT alone (group 2). Group comorbidities, initial presenting symptoms, and Clinical, Etiologic, Anatomic, and Pathologic (CEAP) classification scores were compared. Postprocedural duplex ultrasound was used to assess valve function and treated vein patency rates. At all visits, Villalta and CEAP scores were recorded and compared. Group demographic and procedural results were analyzed by Fisher exact test for dichotomous variables and Kruskal-Wallis equality-of-populations rank test for the ordinal and continuous data. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were used to assess preserved valve function as well as primary and secondary patency rates. Results There were 79 patients with 102 limbs treated for extensive iliofemoral DVT (median age, 51.5 years; range, 16.6-83.8 years). There were 18 patients in group 1 and 61 patients in group 2 (PMT + CDT [n = 54] or CDT alone [n = 7]). There were no differences in demographics or comorbidities between groups aside from malignant disease, which was more common in group 1 (35.3% vs 11.5%; P = .03). A total of 102 limbs were analyzed, 24 in group 1 and 78 in group 2. Patients in group 1 had a shorter symptom duration compared with group 2 (7 days vs 16 days; P = .011). The median number of procedures in group 1 was lower than in group 2 (P < .001). At last clinical follow-up, there was no significant difference between the Villalta and CEAP scores or the rate of clinical improvement in symptoms between groups. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, there was no difference in primary patency, secondary patency, and treated valve function at 48 months. Conclusions This study suggests that PMT as a stand-alone therapy is as effective as CDT with or without PMT in preserving valve function and preventing postthrombotic syndrome. Long-term physiologic and functional outcomes are comparable between the modalities, with preserved venous valve function in the majority of patients.
    Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders. 07/2014;