Acute cough: a qualitative analysis of how GPs manage the consultation when patients explicitly or implicitly expect antibiotic prescriptions

General Practice, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Family Practice (Impact Factor: 1.84). 11/2004; 21(5):500-6. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmh505
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to analyse how GPs manage the consultation for acute cough when patients explicitly or implicitly expect antibiotic prescriptions.
A qualitative analysis of audio-taped consultations was carried out. The participants were eight GPs from eight general practices in Northrhine, Germany and their 42 patients with acute cough over a 2 week period. Three researchers analysed the consultations independently, finally agreed by discussion.
Implicit expectations for antibiotics were found frequently, but in none of the 42 consultations was the patient asked directly what she or he expected in terms of therapy. The topic of expectations and demands itself normally was not discussed at all, not even in a non-direct manner. In some consultations, the possibility of an antibiotic prescription was ruled out by the GP from the beginning. In some consultations, even a 'pseudo-consent' was found, avoiding any explicit clarification.
GPs seem to overestimate the actual pressure to prescribe antibiotics for acute cough. The (over) prescription of antibiotics might not be a question of knowledge but a lack of patient centredness.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Respiratory infections are the most common infections in children. The aims of the study were to analyze the use of antibiotics for respiratory infections in the period 2008-2010 in children's population in region of Niš and to estimate the rational use of antibiotics in relation to the recommendations of the National Guidelines for physicians in primary care. Data source was a Pharmacy Niš database. Antibiotics prescriptions were selected for the following diagnoses: H65-H75 (acute otitis media, mastoiditis), J01 (acute sinusitis), J02-J03 (tonsillopharyngitis), J12-J18 (community acquired pneumonia), J20 (acute bronchitis), J32 (chronic sinusitis), J42 (chronic bronchitis). Antibiotic consumption was expressed in defined daily dose/1000 ihhabitants/day. The most widely prescribed antibiotic for the treatment of upper respiratory tract infections in children during the three years was amoxicillin (34.63; 32.50 and 31.00 defined daily dose/1000 inhabitants/day in 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively). In the treatment of infections of the middle ear and mastoid, the combination of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid, was the most prescribed antibiotics (60% of total consumption of antibiotics for this indication). Azithromycin was the most widely prescribed antibiotic for the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections in children during the observed period (6.92; 8.20 and 7.18 defined daily dose/1000 inhabitans/day in 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively). Recommendations of national guidelines are not complied with the treatment of upper and lower respiratory infections in the children population in region of Niš. This could be a sign of potentially irrational use of antibiotics that need to be further examined. Education of physicians can influence irrational use of antibiotics.
    Medicinski pregled 09/2014; 67(9-10):282-9. DOI:10.2298/MPNS1410282L
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives. To investigate the views of parents, clinicians, and children pertaining to prescribing decisions for acute childhood infection in primary care. Methods. A systematic review of qualitative studies. Meta-ethnographic methods were used, with data drawn from the primary studies in an interpretive analysis. Results. A total of 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. The literature was dominated by concerns about antibiotic over-prescription. Children's views were not reported. Clinicians prescribed antibiotics when they felt pressured by parents or others (e.g. employers) to do so, when they believed there was a clear clinical indication, but also when they felt uncertain of clinical or social outcomes they prescribed "just in case". Parents wanted antibiotics when they felt they would improve the current illness, and when they felt pressure from daycare providers or employers. Clinicians avoided antibiotics when they were concerned about adverse reactions or drug resistance, when certain they were not indicated, and when there was no perceived pressure from parents. Parents also wished to avoid adverse effects of antibiotics, and did not want antibiotics when they would not relieve current symptoms. Some parents preferred to avoid medication altogether. Within paediatric consultations, parents sought a medical evaluation and decision. Primary care clinicians want satisfied parents and short consultations. Conclusions. Antibiotic prescriptions for childhood infections in primary care often result from "just in case" prescribing. These findings suggest that interventions which reduce clinician uncertainty regarding social or clinical outcomes and provide strategies to meet parents' needs within a short consultation are most likely to reduce antibiotic prescribing.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Antibiotic resistance has become a critical health issue on a global scale, with much of the problem resulting from inappropriate use of antibiotics in primary care. To change this practice, the global respiratory infection partnership has formulated a pentagonal (five P) framework for the non-antibiotic management of upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) – one of the most common conditions in primary care for which antibiotics are prescribed. The framework presents the rationale for focusing on URTIs to promote antibiotic stewardship in primary care and elaborates on five key areas to focus on to bring about change: policy, prevention, prescribers, pharmacy and patients. The ultimate aim is to adopt a patient-centred symptomatic management strategy using a flexible framework that can be adapted across countries to create a consistent global approach to change behaviour.
    International Journal of Clinical Practice 11/2013; 67(s180). DOI:10.1111/ijcp.12335 · 2.54 Impact Factor


1 Download