Article

Radiofrequency lumbar facet denervation: a comparative study of the reproducibility of lesion size after 2 current radiofrequency techniques.

Centre for Perioperative Medicine, Anesthesiology, and Pain Clinic, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (Impact Factor: 2.12). 10/2004; 29(5):400-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.rapm.2004.06.004
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Radiofrequency facet denervation procedures are widely used for the treatment of chronic low-back pain. Currently, both temperature-controlled and voltage-controlled techniques are used. In this combined in vivo and in vitro study, the electrophysiologic consequences and the effects on lesion size of these techniques were determined.
Thirty-three patients were randomly assigned to receive a lumbar radiofrequency facet denervation by using either temperature-controlled (80 degrees C, 60 seconds) or voltage-controlled (20 V, 60 s) mode. Electrophysiologic parameters in both groups during radiofrequency lesioning were registered. Observed differences between electrodes were quantified and interpreted, using lesion-size data from egg-white experiments.
Seventeen patients in the temperature group were treated with a total of 55 radiofrequency lesions, all considered technically adequate. In the voltage-controlled group, 16 patients received 63 lesions. Of these, 44 (69.8%) procedures were found to be technically inadequate. Voltage-controlled radiofrequency lesioning resulted in uncontrollable fluctuations of temperature, with resultant uncontrollable variations in lesion size. Temperature-controlled mode created reproducible lesion sizes.
There is no consistent relation between voltage and the temperature obtained during radiofrequency lumbar facet denervation. Temperature-controlled radiofrequency lesioning is preferred to create reproducible lesion sizes.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
72 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Low back pain is a common problem with an important socio-economical impact. It is defined as chronic after 7–12 weeks of non-response to conservative therapies. Its estimated prevalence is 15% in adults, rising to 44% in the elderly (Jacobs et al. 2006). Unlike radicular pain where a cause of nerve root compression is often found, the precise etiology of back pain is difficult to establish as the clinical symptoms and the imaging features are often non-specific. Moreover, the fluctuation and subjectivity of pain and psychological factors make diagnosis and choice of therapy complex.
    06/2010: pages 157-177;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of the study was to systematically review the historical therapeutics for chronic pain care directed at the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) and to identify future trends and upcoming treatment strategies. A literature search on bibliographic resources, including EMBASE, PubMed Cochrane Database of Systemic Reviews from literature published from 1966 to December 1, 2012 to identify studies and treatments directed at the DRG to treat chronic pain, and was limited to the English language. Case series, case reports, and preclinical work were excluded. Information on emerging technologies and pharmacologics were captured separately, as they did not meet the inclusion criteria. The literature review yielded three current clinical treatment strategies: ganglionectomy, conventional radiofrequency treatment of the dorsal root ganglion, and pulsed radiofrequency treatment of the DRG. Seven studies were identified utilizing ganglionectomy, 14 for conventional radiofrequency, and 16 for pulsed radiofrequency. Electrical stimulation and novel therapeutic delivery strategies have been proposed and are in development. Despite a robust understanding of the DRG and its importance in acute nociception, as well as the development and maintenance of chronic pain, relatively poor evidence exists regarding current therapeutic strategies. Novel therapies like electrical and pharmacologic strategies are on the horizon, and more prospective study is required to better qualify the role of the DRG in chronic pain care.
    Pain Medicine 06/2013; · 2.24 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Study Design. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Objective. To assess treatment effects (benefits and harms) of radiofrenquency denervation for patients with facet joint related chronic low back pain.Summary of Background Data. There is no consensus regarding the treatment efficacy of facet joint radiofrequency denervation (FJRD) and how it compares to nerve blockades and joint infiltration with anesthetics and/or corticosteroids.Methods. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and LILACS for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared FJRD with blockades, infiltrations, or placebo. Primary outcomes were pain, functional status, and quality of life. Secondary outcomes were cost-effectiveness and complications.Results. Fifteen studies were selected and nine were eligible. Overall quality of evidence was rated low to moderate. The evidence favored FJRD regarding pain control. There was no sufficient evidence for cost-effectiveness and complications.Conclusion. The available evidence reviewed in this study should be interpreted with caution. The data indicates that FJDR is more effective than placebo in pain control and functional improvement, and is also possibly more effective than steroid injections in pain control. Complications and adverse effects were not sufficiently reported to allow comparisons, and there was no evidence for cost-effectiveness. High-quality RCTs addressing pain, function, quality of life, complications, and cost-effectiveness are urgently needed.
    Spine 04/2014; · 2.45 Impact Factor