Article

Engaging families in child mental health services

Departments of Psychiatry and Community Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 1425 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America (Impact Factor: 2.6). 11/2004; 13(4):905-21, vii. DOI: 10.1016/j.chc.2004.04.001
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To increase the involvement of urban youth and families who need mental health services, child mental health agencies and providers might consider the following: (1) examining intake procedures and developing interventions to target specific barriers to service use; (2) providing training and supervision to providers to increase a focus on engagement in the first face-to-face meetings with youth and families; (3) providing service delivery options with input from consumers regarding types of services offered. Involvement of youth and their families is a primary goal that must receive as much attention as any other part of the service delivery process. One might argue that without youth and family participation, effective services never will be provided to youth and families in need.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Mary Mckay, Jul 16, 2015
2 Followers
 · 
136 Views
  • Source
    • "Attendance involves the presence of the agreed-upon participants during a therapeutic contact (Nock & Ferriter, 2005) and is an easy-to-measure outcome with demonstrated associations with treatment outcome (e.g., Baydar, Reid, & Webster-Stratton, 2003). Multiple scholars have published qualitative reviews of engagement intervention studies presenting strategies for increasing initial attendance and ongoing retention in services, such as appointment reminders, discussion and resolution of barriers to treatment, incentives, and motivational interviewing (e.g., Ingoldsby, 2010; McKay & Bannon, 2004). Yet the overreliance on attendance as the primary outcome of interest has important implications for our conceptualization of evidence-based engagement interventions . "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Using the distillation component of the Distillation and Matching Model framework (Chorpita, Daleiden, & Weisz, 2005 ), we examined which engagement practices were associated with three domains of treatment engagement: attendance, adherence, and cognitive preparation (e.g., understanding of, readiness for treatment). Eighty-nine engagement interventions from 40 randomized controlled trials in children' s mental health services were coded according to their engagement practices and outcomes. Analyses examined whether the practices used in successful interventions differed according to engagement domain. Practice patterns differed somewhat depending on whether attendance, adherence, or cognitive preparation was the outcome of interest. For example, assessment of barriers to treatment frequently occurred in successful interventions targeting attendance, whereas homework assignment frequently occurred in successful interventions when adherence was the target outcome. Modeling and expectation setting were frequently used in successful interventions targeting cognitive preparation for treatment. Distillation provides a method for examining the practice patterns associated with different engagement outcomes. An example of the application of these findings to clinical practice includes using certain practices (e.g., assessment, psychoeducation about services, and accessibility promotion) with all youth and families to promote attendance, adherence, and cognitive preparation. Then, other practices (e.g., modeling, homework assignment) can be added on an as-needed basis to boost engagement or to address interference in a particular engagement domain. The use of a distillation framework promotes a common language around engagement and highlights practices that lend themselves well to training, thereby promoting the dissemination of engagement interventions.
    Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology 07/2013; 44(1). DOI:10.1080/15374416.2013.814543 · 1.92 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "families are likely to present with the most complex mental health difficulties, yet research studies abound that these are the same youth who are least likely to have appropriate contact with the child mental health system (U.S. Public Health Service, 2000, 2001) and even if they become involved with an outpatient child mental health clinic, they are the most likely to be lost to " no shows " and early dropouts (McKay & Bannon, 2004). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this article is to highlight the benefits of collaboration in child focused mental health services research. METHOD: Three unique research projects are described. These projects address the mental health needs of vulnerable, urban, minority children and their families. In each one, service delivery was codesigned, interventions were co-delivered and a team of stakeholders collaboratively tested the impact of each one. RESULTS: The results indicate that the three interventions designed, delivered, and tested are associated with reductions in youth mental health symptoms. CONCLUSION: These interventions are feasible alternatives to traditional individualized outpatient treatment.
    Research on Social Work Practice 09/2010; 20(5):476-482. DOI:10.1177/1049731509360976 · 1.53 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "without completing it (Kazdin, 1996; McKay & Bannon, 2004; Morrissey-Kane & Prinz, 1999). Perhaps this should not be surprising, since caregivers and youth report experiencing traditional services and service systems as stigmatizing, blaming, deficit-based, and lacking in respect for their real needs and for their economic, social, and cultural realities (Federation of Families for Children's Mental Health [FFCMH] & Keys for Networking Inc., 2001; Hinshaw, 2005; Johnson et al., 2003; Pescosolido, Perry, Martin, McLeod, & Jensen, 2007; Petr & Allen, 1997; Yeh, Hough, McCabe, Lau, & Garland, 2004). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: One of the most significant recent trends in the field of children's mental health has been the shift in the conceptualization of authority and expertise. Increasingly, there are demands to recognize—and to respond to—the perspectives of people who have tra-ditionally been seen more as passive targets of interventions and other change efforts. This has led to a variety of efforts to blend perspectives and/or build partnerships between consumers and providers or between researchers and practitioners. This article explores how a commitment to blending perspectives as a way of providing children's mental health services was a central factor in the emergence of wraparound, a widely implemented care-planning approach for children with complex needs and their families. The commitment to blending perspectives is also a central organizing principle of the collaborative work of a community of practice called the National Wraparound Initia-tive (NWI), which has worked to support wraparound and to generate knowledge about wraparound practice and implementation. The article goes on to describe some of the benefits, challenges, and tensions that have emerged in the work of the community of practice and to consider what the experience of the NWI may have to offer to others engaged in similar efforts.
Show more