Biocompatibility of human Osteosarcoma cells to root end filling materials

Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, No. 620, Shr Jeng Road, Taichung, Taiwan.
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials (Impact Factor: 2.76). 01/2005; 72(1):140-5. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30137
Source: PubMed


Ideal root end filling materials should have good physical and chemical properties, and the most important is that the material should be biocompatible with periradicular tissue. The biocompatibility of three root end filling materials, mineral trioxide aggregate, calcium hydroxide-based cement, and eugenol-based cement, were investigated in vitro by culturing extracts of these materials with human osteogenic sarcoma cells (U2OS). Extracts of each of the materials were made after incubation of the materials for 1 day and 1 week with complete McCoy's medium. The extracts were serially diluted and then incubated with U2OS cells for 24 and 48 h. Cell survival rates were assessed by means of a viability assay for mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity. Differences in mean cell survival rates were statistically assessed using one-way ANOVA. Results showed that the survival rates of U2OS cells were largest with mineral trioxide aggregate, followed by calcium hydroxide-based cement and eugenol-based cement at 24- and 48-h exposures using the 1-day and 1-week extracts. The duration of root end filling material extraction time and treatment time showed variable influence on the survival rates. The results suggest that mineral trioxide aggregate is more biocompatible than the other root end filling materials and is suitable for use in the clinical setting.

Download full-text


Available from: Chi-Chiang Yang, Sep 25, 2015
  • Source
    • "These findings are consistent with the overall impression that MTA is highly biocompatible whilst eugenol containing materials are seriously and calcium hydroxide-based materials somewhat cytotoxic (Hunag et al. 2001, Huang et al. 2005). The data presented here add only a very small increment to our understanding of the genesis of post-obturation discomfort. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine whether commonly used endodontic sealers could either induce or increase the release of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) when in contact with cell types found in the periapical tissues. Freshly mixed samples of Roth 801 sealer, Sealapex and ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) were placed in contact with cultured macrophages and fibroblasts for 24 h. The supernatant from the cultures was assayed for PGE2 using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Cell viability counts were made. As a positive control, similar cultures were also exposed to lipopolysaccharide and the supernatant analysed for PGE2. Data were compared by anova. The three materials examined in these experiments did not stimulate increased PGE2 release from either of the cell lines. In control cultures, lipopolysaccharide increased PGE2 release from macrophages but not from fibroblasts. Viability counts revealed that, whilst Roth 801 sealer caused some cell death in both fibroblasts and macrophages, Sealapex led to cell death only in the macrophage cultures. ProRoot MTA did not lead to statistically significant cell death in either culture. Under 24-h culture conditions, the three freshly mixed test materials did not increase directly either production or release of PGE2 from either macrophages or gingival fibroblasts. Roth 801 decreased cell viability counts for both fibroblasts and macrophages. Sealapex decreases macrophage viability. ProRoot MTA did not affect viability in either cell line.
    International Endodontic Journal 06/2006; 39(5):357-62. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01070.x · 2.97 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The requirements of an ideal root-end filling are reviewed, before the demise of amalgam is considered. The focus is on tissue response to newer alternative materials: zinc oxide–eugenol cements, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, glass ionomer cements, composite resins, compomers, and Diaket. The conflicting findings of in vitro and in vivo studies are analysed, as well as whether a root-end filling is necessary. The ‘apical seal’ is revisited with support for the concept of a ‘double seal’ that is physical and biological.
    Endodontic Topics 06/2005; 11(1):114 - 130. DOI:10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00164.x
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study compared the effects of three root-end-filling materials: mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), 4-META/MMA-TBB resin (Super-bond), and intermediate restorative material (IRM) on osteoblast adhesion, proliferation, and matrix formation. MC3T3-E1 cells were inoculated on set material specimens, and the number of cells adhered to each material was assessed at 6 hours and at 3 days of incubation by using Hoechst 33258 staining under a fluorescence microscope. Furthermore, on day 21 of culture, areas in contact with each material surface were observed at light and electron microscopic levels. Cultured cells that adhered to MTA and Super-bond proliferated significantly between 6 hours and 3 days of culture. In addition, on day 21, they produced a thick matrix layer directly on the material surfaces. In contrast, the number of cells that adhered to IRM significantly decreased with time. These cells appeared round in shape, and no matrix formation was found. These results suggest that MTA and Super-bond have good biocompatibility and allow hard-tissue forming cells to create a matrix layer, which might enhance apical tissue regeneration.
    Journal of Endodontics 10/2007; 33(9):1066-9. DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2007.05.006 · 3.38 Impact Factor
Show more