Pectoralis major and other myofascial/myocutaneous flaps in head and neck cancer reconstruction: experience with 437 cases at a single institution.

Head and Neck Surgery and Otorhinolaryngology Department, Centro de Tratamento e Pesquisa Hospital do Câncer A. C. Camargo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Head & Neck (Impact Factor: 2.83). 01/2005; 26(12):1018-23. DOI: 10.1002/hed.20101
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Pectoralis major and other myofascial/myocutaneous flaps have been recognized as important reconstructive methods in head and neck cancer surgery. Even with the worldwide use of free flaps, they are still the mainstay reconstructive procedures in many centers.
We retrospectively analyzed the records of patients with head and neck cancer who underwent an immediate reconstruction with pectoralis major or other myofascial/myocutaneous flaps at a tertiary cancer center from 1982 to 1998.
A total of 437 patients were reviewed. Three hundred seventy-one patients underwent pectoralis major myocutaneous flaps; of these, 335 (90.3%) were men, with a median age of 56 years (range, 24-91 years). Tumors were located at the oral cavity and oropharynx in 246 patients (66.3%). Most tumors were at an advanced stage at presentation (T3-T4 in 60.9%). The flaps were used to cover mucosal defects in 280 patients (75.5%), skin defects in 62 patients (16.7%), and both in 29 patients (7.8%). In most patients, the flap was transferred to the head and neck region through a subclavicular tunnel. The overall complication rate was 36.1%, with 2.4% of cases involving total flap necrosis.
To date, this is the largest published series of patients who underwent reconstruction with a pectoralis major flap. Our results show that this flap remains an important reconstructive method, and it can be done with low risk and acceptable morbidity.

1 Bookmark
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The pectoralis major myocutaneous pedicled flap (PMMPF) – the “workhorse” for head and neck reconstruction – is associated with a high incidence of complications in certain cases. This study presents free tissue transfer as an alternative salvage technique after PMMPF failure in head and neck reconstruction. It includes seven consecutive patients who underwent free tissue salvage after PMMPF failure in head and neck reconstruction from January 2008 to September 2010 at Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Taiwan. Four vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flaps were applied for tongue and mouth floor defects, while three anterolateral thigh (ALT) flaps were used for mouth floor, buccal, and cheek defects. All flaps survived uneventfully, and normal oral feeding was achieved without major complications. Free tissue transfer has several advantages and can be successfully employed in head and neck reconstruction, and it is also a reliable salvage procedure after PMMPF failure in such cases.
    Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery. 09/2012; 46(5).
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the era of free-flap transfer, the pectoralis major musculocutaneous flap still plays a unique role in head and neck reconstruction. We report on a patient with a recurrent hypopharyngeal carcinoma after total pharyngolaryngectomy and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in whom defects included a circumferential defect of the oropharynx and the entire tongue. The defects were successfully reconstructed with a T-shaped pectoralis major musculocutaneous flap whose skin island included multiple intercostal perforators from the internal mammary vessels. This flap design is effective for reconstructing circumferential pharyngeal defects in vessel-depleted neck.
    Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open. 04/2014; 2(4):e129.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Our study investigated the quality of life (QoL) of Chinese patients after immediate reconstruction surgery on individuals with head and neck cancer. In addition, we compared the differences between pectoralis major myocutaneous flap (PMMF) and anterolateral thigh free flap (ALTFF). The University of Washington Quality of Life questionnaire, version 4, was used to assess the QoL. Assessments were performed at least 24 months postoperatively. A total of 110 patients' records were obtained. Among them, 86 patients completed a QoL questionnaire (78.2%). No significant differences could be found in age, primary site, T stage, N stage, and postoperative radiotherapy between PMMF and ALTFF groups. However, there were significant differences between both groups in sex, operation time, and complication. A matched analysis was performed to compare the differences in QoL between patients with head and neck cancers reconstructed with PMMF or ALTFF. Patients reconstructed with ALTFF had better shoulder but worse speech functions. There was a significant effect on the QoL of head and neck cancer patients who had undergone either PMMF or ALTFF reconstruction. The result of this study provide useful information for physicians and patients during their discussion of treatment modalities for head and neck cancers.
    The Journal of craniofacial surgery 04/2014; · 0.81 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 21, 2014