Damage control in the abdomen and beyond

Department of Surgery, Johannesburg Hospital, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
British Journal of Surgery (Impact Factor: 5.21). 09/2004; 91(9):1095-1101. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4641
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Damage control is not a modern concept, but the application of this approach represents a new paradigm in surgery, borne out of a need to care for patients sustaining multiple high-energy injuries.
A Medline search was performed to locate English language articles relating to damage control procedures in trauma patients. The retrieved articles were manually cross-referenced, and additional academic and historical articles were identified.
Damage control surgery, sometimes known as 'damage limitation surgery' or 'abbreviated laparotomy', is best defined as creating a stable anatomical environment to prevent the patient from progressing to an unsalvageable metabolic state. Patients are more likely to die from metabolic failure than from failure to complete organ repairs. It is with this awareness that damage control surgery is performed, enabling the patient to maintain a sustainable physiological envelope.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aim To review our local experience with presentation and management of retroperitoneal haematomas (RPH) discovered at laparotomy and factors affecting outcome. Methods Patients with retroperitoneal haematomas (RPH) were identified from a prospective database. Data collected included demographics, clinical presentation, zones and organs involved, management and outcome. Results Of a total of 488 patients with abdominal trauma, 145 (30%) with RPH were identified 136 of whom were male (M:F = 15:1). Mean age was 28.8 (SD 10.6) years and Median delay before surgery was 7 hours. The injury mechanisms were firearms (109), stabs (24), and blunt trauma (12). Twenty four patients (17%) presented with shock. There were 58 Zone I, 69 Zone II, and 38 Zone III haematomas. The median Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 9. Fifty two patients (36%) developed complications and 26 (18%) patients died. Sixty four (44%) patients required ICU with median ICU stay of 3 days. All Zone I injuries were explored; Zone II and III were explored selectively. The mortality for Zones I, II, III and IV was 14%, 4%, 29% and 35% respectively. Mortality was highest for blunt trauma and lowest for stabs (p = 0,146). Twelve of 24 patients with shock died (50%) compared to 14 of 121 (12%) without shock (p < 0.0001). Eighteen of 64 patients with <6-hours delay before surgery died (28%) compared to 8 of 81 (10%) with >6-hours’ delay (p <0.017). mortality increased with increasing ISS. Median hospital stay was 8 days. Conclusion RPH accounted for 30% of abdominal trauma. Injury mechanism, presence of shock, delay before surgery and ISS showed a significant association with mortality.
    Injury 09/2014; 45(9). DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2014.01.026 · 2.46 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article is a primer to understand the medical advances and the future health care consequences of the current conflicts in the Middle East and Southwest Asia, known as the Global War on Terror. There have been significant advances in health care learned in caring for those injured by the conflict-often a polytrauma blast victim, but there are also very high incidence rates of the hidden injuries of war-traumatic brain injury, post-traumatic stress disorder, suicide, and depression. These lead to disruptive behaviors, homelessness, and family violence. Global War on Terror returnees are using medical services and applying for disability at higher rates than in previous conflicts. The costs for veterans' care may peak 30 to 40 years or longer following the conflict, and will inflict an enormous burden on services and resources. The effects of the war will linger for years and impact across generations because of the stress on families and children. We must mobilize government agencies, create public-private partnerships, and invest our resources now to mitigate the approaching tsunami of veterans' health care needs, the impact on our social services, and the devastating costs to society.
    04/2014; 179(4):348-55. DOI:10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00471
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Damage control (DC) has improved survival from severe abdominal and extremity injuries. The data on the surgical strategies and outcomes in patients managed with DC for severe thoracic injuries are scarce. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of patients treated with DC for thoracic/pulmonary complex trauma at two Level I trauma centers from 2006 to 2010. Subjects 14 years and older were included. Demographics, trauma characteristics, surgical techniques, and resuscitation strategies were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 840 trauma thoracotomies were performed. DC thoracotomy (DCT) was performed in 31 patients (3.7%). Pulmonary trauma was found in 25 of them. The median age was 28 years (interquartile range [IQR], 20Y34 years), Revised Trauma Score (RTS) was 7.11 (IQR, 5.44Y7.55), and Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 26 (IQR, 25Y41). Nineteen patients had gunshot wounds, four had stab wounds, and two had blunt trauma. Pulmonary trauma was managed by pneumorrhaphy in 3, tractotomy in 12, wedge resection in 1, and packing as primary treatment in 8 patients. Clamping of the pulmonary hilum was used as a last resource in seven patients. Five patients returned to the intensive care unit with the pulmonary hilum occluded by a vascular clamp or an en masse ligature. These patients underwent a deferred resection within 16 hours to 90 hours after the initial DCT. Four of them survived. Bleeding from other intrathoracic sources was found in 20 patients: major vessels in nine, heart in three, and thoracic wall in nine. DCT mortality in pulmonary trauma was 6 (24%) of 25 because of coagulopathy, or persistent bleeding in 5 patients and multiorgan failure in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: This series describes our experience with DCT in severe lung trauma. We describe pulmonary hilum clamping and deferred lung resection as a viable surgical alternative for major pulmonary injuries and the use of packing as a definitive method for hemorrhage control. (J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78: 45Y51. Copyright * 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.) LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Epidemiologic study, level V. KEY WORDS: Thoracic injuries; lung injury; penetrating; damage control; deferred pneumonectomy.
    The Journal of trauma 01/2015; 78(1):45. DOI:10.1097/TA.0000000000000482 · 2.96 Impact Factor