Which medical conditions account for the rise in health care spending?

Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Health Affairs (Impact Factor: 4.32). 09/2004; Suppl Web Exclusives(5):W4-437-45. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.w4.437
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We calculate the level and growth in health care spending attributable to the fifteen most expensive medical conditions in 1987 and 2000. Growth in spending by medical condition is decomposed into changes attributable to rising cost per treated case, treated prevalence, and population growth. We find that a small number of conditions account for most of the growth in health care spending--the top five medical conditions accounted for 31 percent. For four of the conditions, a rise in treated prevalence, rather than rising treatment costs per case or population growth, accounted for most of the spending growth.

Download full-text


Available from: Curtis Florence, Jul 15, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The escalating rate of obesity in the US highlights the importance of understanding the causes for this rise. In this paper I employ the First, Second, and Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys to estimate a structural model of the determinants of adult obesity. To control for the potential endogeneity of some explanatory variables, such as caloric intake (adjusted for activity level) and smoking, a set of reduced form equations for these outcomes is estimated simultaneously with the obesity equation. To identify each equation, I use an array of state-level characteristics as instrumental variables. Trends in these variables shed light on the sources of the rapid increase in obesity since 1980.
    The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 05/2006; DOI:10.1016/j.qref.2005.11.002
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Consumers' price responsiveness is central to US health-care reform proposals, but the best available estimates are now more than 25 years old. We estimate health-care demands by calculating expected end-of-year prices and incorporating them into a zero-inflated ordered probit model applied to several overlapping panels of data from 1996 to 2003. Results from our correlated random effects specification indicate that the price responsiveness of ambulatory mental health treatment has decreased substantially and is now slightly lower than physical health treatment. This suggests that concerns over moral hazard alone do not warrant less generous coverage for mental health. However, prescription drug demand is more price elastic.
    Health Economics 01/2006; 19(3):297-315. DOI:10.1002/hec.1476 · 2.14 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent information systems research has challenged the tendency of researchers to focus upon single information systems (Vertegaal 2003) and upon individuals simply as users of those systems (Lamb and Kling 2003). Responding to these critiques, this paper forwards a new paradigm through which to study knowledge management - the multimodal knowledge network, which includes both people and IS as nodes within a single network. Drawing heavily upon the field of social network research, we argue that the way in which multiple individuals interact with one another and with multiple information systems will have significant implications for organizational knowledge sharing outcomes. In this paper, we build our theory of multimodal knowledge networks using comparative case study. We study six healthcare teams in a large healthcare organization and find that, although these teams have identical portfolios of information systems and a similar complement of employees, each team configures its knowledge resources differently to complete similar tasks. We find that the structural, cognitive, and relational dimensions of this multimodal knowledge network have implications on knowledge outcomes for the network. We develop propositions as a result of this analysis and outline directions for future research.