Article

Randomized controlled open study of sublingual immunotherapy for respiratory allergy in real-life: clinical efficacy and more.

Pneumology Unit, Cuasso al Monte, Macchi Hospital Foundation, Varese, Italy.
Allergy (Impact Factor: 6). 12/2004; 59(11):1205-10. DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2004.00508.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Some aspects of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) still need to be addressed: magnitude of the clinical efficacy, effect on the bronchial hyperreactivity adherence to treatment, preventive effect. We attempted to clarify these points in a randomized open, controlled, two parallel group study in a real-life setting.
Five hundred and eleven patients with allergic rhinitis with or without intermittent asthma were randomized to drugs only or drugs + SLIT (rate 2 : 3) for 3 years. The clinical score (symptoms + drug intake) was measured each year during the allergen exposure. Pulmonary function test, methacholine challenge and skin tests were performed at the beginning and at the end of the study. Adherence to treatment was assessed by measuring the consumed extract.
Three hundred and nineteen patients received SLIT and 192 drugs only. Dropouts were 15% in the SLIT group and 12% in the controls. There was a significant improvement of clinical scores in the SLIT group: baseline 147 +/- 3.3, first year 72.9 +/- 1.3, second year 68.3 +/- 1.8, third year 54.7 +/- 2.8 (P < 0.0001 vs baseline). Control group: baseline 138 +/- 2.3, first year 124.1 +/- 3.7, second year 111 +/- 3.3, third year 121 +/- 3.8 (P = NS). Only four patients reported systemic itching. Adherence was >80% in 72% and >60% in 18% of patients. The number of patients with a positive MCh challenge decreased significantly after 3 years only in the SLIT group. New skin sensitizations appeared in 38% of the controls and in 5.9% of the SLIT patients (P = 0.01).
Sublingual immunotherapy approximately halved the clinical scores and significantly reduced the bronchial hyperreactivity. Similarly to subcutaneous immunotherapy, SLIT displayed a preventive effect on the onset of new skin sensitizations. The adherence rate was quantitatively satisfactory.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
87 Views
  • Source
    Allergy, asthma & immunology research 03/2015; 7(2):99-100. · 3.08 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Allergy to cow's milk increases the risk of sensitization to other foods in young children. We sought to evaluate the effect of early epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) on further sensitization to peanut or house dust mite (HDM) in a murine model of sensitization to cow's milk. BALB/c mice orally sensitized to milk were epicutaneously treated with a Viaskin patch (DBV Technologies) loaded with milk proteins for 8 weeks. Mice were then sensitized to peanut or HDM. After sensitization to peanut, mice were exposed to a peanut regimen known to induce eosinophilic esophageal inflammation. After sensitization to HDM, mice were challenged with aerosols to HDM, and airway hyperresponsiveness was evaluated by using plethysmography. Humoral response was also analyzed. The role of regulatory T (Treg) cells was evaluated by adoptively transferring Treg cells from milk EPIT-treated mice to naive mice before sensitization to peanut. Protection against anaphylaxis was also investigated. Methylation of the promoter region of transcription factors was analyzed by using PCR assays. In milk-sensitized mice specific EPIT prevented further sensitization to peanut or HDM. EPIT significantly modified the humoral response, reduced TH2 cytokine levels, decreased eosinophilic esophageal infiltration, and suppressed airway hyperresponsiveness. The protective effect was sustained over 2 months. Moreover, the adoptive transfer of milk EPIT Treg cells completely prevented sensitization to peanut and peanut-induced anaphylaxis. Milk EPIT enhanced methylation of the GATA-3 promoter region. Our results showed that EPIT influences the natural history of allergy and reduces the risk of further sensitization through a Treg cell-dependent mechanism. Copyright © 2014 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 01/2015; · 11.25 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT) induces clinical and immunological tolerance as defined by persistence of clinical benefit and associated long-term immunological parameters after cessation of treatment. Although the efficacy of SIT has been shown in terms of reducing symptoms, medication consumption and ameliorating quality of life in both allergic rhinitis and asthma, there has long been some controversies about effectiveness of SIT in the treatment of allergic asthma. The type of allergen, the dose and protocol of immunotherapy, patient selection criteria, the severity and control of asthma, all are significant contributors to the power of efficacy in allergic asthma. The initiation of SIT in allergic asthma should be considered in case of coexisting of other allergic diseases such as allergic rhinitis, unacceptable adverse effects of medications, patient's preference to avoid long-term pharmacotherapy. Steroid sparing effect of SIT in allergic asthma is also an important benefit particularly in patients who have to use these drugs in high doses for a long-time. Symptomatic asthma is a risk factor for systemic reactions and asthma should be controlled at the time of administration of SIT. Both subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) have been found to be effective in patients with allergic asthma. Although the safety profile of SLIT seems to be better than SCIT, the results of some studies and meta-analyses suggest that the efficacy of SCIT may appear better and earlier than SLIT in children with allergic asthma.
    World journal of clinical cases. 12/2014; 2(12):859-65.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
4 Downloads
Available from
Oct 21, 2014