Counseling Parents and Children on Sun Protection: A National Survey of Pediatricians

Children's Hospital at Montefiore, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.
PEDIATRICS (Impact Factor: 5.47). 10/2004; 114(4):1056-64. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2004-1305
Source: PubMed


To describe pediatricians' attitudes toward skin cancer (SC), sun protection (SP) counseling, and the quantity and content of such counseling and to identify barriers to counseling.
An American Academy of Pediatrics Periodic Survey was mailed to 1616 randomly selected US members between October 2001 and February 2002. The response rate was 54.6%.
More than 90% of pediatricians agreed that SC is a significant public health problem and that preventing episodic high exposures to the sun during childhood will reduce the risk of adult melanoma. However, only 22.3% of respondents reported counseling most patients in all age groups. Female pediatricians were more likely to counsel most patients; pediatricians located in the South and West and those who practice in hospital/clinic settings were least likely to counsel compared with those in other regions. Approximately half (53%) of pediatricians reported selectively counseling on the basis of patient characteristics The most important SP recommendation named was using a sunscreen with a sun protection factor > or =15. Only 38% of pediatricians rated SP as very important to their patients' health compared with other topics such as use of car seats (86%), nutrition (79%), immunization issues (76%), and smoking/avoidance of environmental tobacco smoke (74%). The most frequently named barrier to SP counseling was lack of time (58% reporting).
Although the majority of pediatricians believe that SC prevention is a worthy issue, only a minority reported providing routine SP counseling to most patients in every age group, and most ranked SP lower in importance than other issues. Interventions might include programs and materials to educate patients and pediatricians alike. To have an effect on increasing rates of SC and SC mortality, a broader public health approach is needed as a complement to pediatricians' counseling efforts.

5 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Practitioners see a large number of children affected by environmental exposures each year. A national network of pediatric environmental health specialty units has been established to
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It is forecasted that cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) will become one of the most dangerous tumors of the 21st century. Results of treatment of CMM in Poland are very poor compared with highly developed countries. Clinical outcome is strongly influenced by the stage of the disease. The aim of this study was to discuss current data concerning CMM primary and secondary prophylaxis. This is a systematic review of published reports on the pri− mary and secondary prophylaxis of cutaneous malignant melanoma. The search for available literature was per− formed in the PubMed National Library of Medicine database. The most effective method of reducing morbidity and mortality of CMM is prophylaxis. Primary prophylaxis consists of minimizing UV radiation exposure, achieved by reducing exposure to the sun, wearing proper clothing and sunglasses, following sun−protective behav− iors, using sunscreen, and avoiding sunlamps and tanning beds. However, it is unclear whether using sunscreen reduces the incidence of melanoma. Secondary prophylaxis against melanoma consists of regular self and clinical examination of the skin in order to diagnose tumors at an early stage and to identify individuals at increased risk of developing melanoma. Health education, including the dissemination of knowledge on protection from harmful solar exposure and awareness of the early symptoms and signs of skin malignancies, may help improve prognosis. Many countries are trying to introduce skin cancer prevention programs. The efficacy of primary and secondary prophylaxis has been proven by decreases in the mortality rates in the USA and Australia, where prophylaxis and
  • Source
Show more