Comparative efficacy of hormone replacement therapy, etidronate, calcitonin, alfacalcidol, and vitamin K in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: The Yamaguchi Osteoporosis Prevention Study
ABSTRACT To assess the comparative effectiveness of several medications on bone mineral density, biochemical bone markers, and the incidence of vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.
A total of 396 postmenopausal women, aged 50 to 75 years, were allocated randomly to six equal-sized groups: hormone replacement therapy, etidronate, eel calcitonin, alfacalcidol, vitamin K (menatetrenone), or control (no treatment). Thoracic and lumbar spine radiographs, bone mineral density at the distal radius, and markers of bone turnover were assessed at baseline and every 3 months during the 2-year study.
Compared with baseline, the 2-year mean changes in bone mineral density were 2.0% for hormone replacement therapy, -0.5% for etidronate, 1.6% for calcitonin, -3.6% for alfacalcidol, -1.9% for vitamin K, and -3.3% for control. Seventeen (26%) of the 66 control patients developed new vertebral fractures. Compared with controls, the relative risks of vertebral fracture were 0.35 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.14 to 0.83) for hormone replacement therapy, 0.40 (95% CI: 0.17 to 0.92) for etidronate, 0.41 (95% CI: 0.17 to 0.93) for calcitonin, 0.56 (95% CI: 0.26 to 1.12) for alfacalcidol, and 0.44 (95% CI: 0.20 to 0.99) for vitamin K.
We observed significant reductions in the incidence of vertebral fractures with hormone replacement therapy, etidronate, and calcitonin, and significant improvements in bone mineral density with hormone replacement therapy and calcitonin.
- SourceAvailable from: Masataka Shiraki
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
- "The effect of alfacalcidol on vertebral fracture incidence has been examined. Some studies reported positive results  , while others did not show a significant reduction in vertebral fractures with alfacalcidol  . A previous meta-analysis reported that active and native vitamin D 3 reduced the risk of vertebral fracture . "
ABSTRACT: Eldecalcitol is an analog of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) that improves bone mineral density; however, the effect of eldecalcitol on the risk of fractures is unclear. The objective of this study is to examine whether eldecalcitol is superior to alfacalcidol in preventing osteoporotic fractures. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00144456. This 3 year randomized, double-blind, active comparator, superiority trial tested the efficacy of daily oral 0.75 μg eldecalcitol versus 1.0 μg alfacalcidol for prevention of osteoporotic fractures. 1054 osteoporotic patients 46 to 92 years old were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive eldecalcitol (n=528) or alfacalcidol (n=526). Patients were stratified by study site and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level. Patients with low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels (<50 nmol/L) were supplemented with 400 IU/day vitamin D(3). Primary end point was incident vertebral fractures. Secondary end points included any non-vertebral fractures and change in bone mineral density and bone turnover markers. Compared with the alfacalcidol group, the incidence of vertebral fractures was lower in eldecalcitol group after 36 months of treatment (13.4 vs. 17.5%; hazard ratio, 0.74; predefined 90% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-0.97). Eldecalcitol reduced turnover markers and increased bone mineral density more strongly than alfacalcidol. Eldecalcitol reduced the incidence of three major non-vertebral fractures, which was due to a marked reduction in wrist fractures by a post-hoc analysis (1.1 vs. 3.6%; hazard ratio, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.11-0.77). Among the adverse events, the incidence of increase in serum and urinary calcium was higher in the eldecalcitol group, without any difference in glomerular filtration rate between the two groups. Eldecalcitol is more efficacious than alfacalcidol in preventing vertebral and wrist fractures in osteoporotic patients with vitamin D sufficiency, with a safety profile similar to alfacalcidol.Bone 07/2011; 49(4):605-12. DOI:10.1016/j.bone.2011.07.011 · 4.46 Impact Factor
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
- "Sato et al, 33 1998 Shiraki et al, 36 2000 Sato et al, 34 2002 Ishida and Kawai, 26 2004 Sato et al, 35 2005 "
ABSTRACT: Observational and some experimental data suggest that low intake of vitamin K may be associated with an increased risk of fracture. To assess whether oral vitamin K (phytonadione and menaquinone) supplementation can reduce bone loss and prevent fractures. The search included the following electronic databases: MEDLINE (1966 to June 2005), EMBASE (1980 to June 2005), the Cochrane Library (issue 2, 2005), the ISI Web of Science (1945 to June 2005), the National Research Register (inception to the present), Current Controlled Trials, and the Medical Research Council Research Register. Randomized controlled trials that gave adult participants oral phytonadione and menaquinone supplements for longer than 6 months were included in this review. Four authors extracted data on changes in bone density and type of fracture. All articles were double screened and double data extracted. Thirteen trials were identified with data on bone loss, and 7 reported fracture data. All studies but 1 showed an advantage of phytonadione and menaquinone in reducing bone loss. All 7 trials that reported fracture effects were Japanese and used menaquinone. Pooling the 7 trials with fracture data in a meta-analysis, we found an odds ratio (OR) favoring menaquinone of 0.40 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25-0.65) for vertebral fractures, an OR of 0.23 (95% CI, 0.12-0.47) for hip fractures, and an OR of 0.19 (95% CI, 0.11-0.35) for all nonvertebral fractures. This systematic review suggests that supplementation with phytonadione and menaquinone-4 reduces bone loss. In the case of the latter, there is a strong effect on incident fractures among Japanese patients.Archives of Internal Medicine 07/2006; 166(12):1256-61. DOI:10.1001/archinte.166.12.1256 · 13.25 Impact Factor
Article: Revisión bibliográfica[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Characteristics of research for community nursing care quality The aim of this work is to characterise the research for qua- lity being carried out in the scope of community nursing care in our country and to identify future strategies to improve the quality of nursing care. A bibliographic review on scientific production relating to the subject of study was performed using the «Cuiden» and «IME» databases. A total of 44 works were selected, with analysis of the following variables: year of publication, ma- gazine or journal of publication, type of study, and the ap- proach used in the evaluation of quality, the set up of im- provement measures and the evaluation of the impact of such measures on quality. Fifty per cent (50%) of studies were published in the period between 1997 and 2000. The majority of articles relating to quality in community nursing were published either in the "Rol de Enfermería" magazine or in the "Index de Enferme- ría" magazine. 64% of studies were original studies. Most studies (60%) were based on a process approach. The nur- sing consultation office is the most frequent setting from which this type of studies arises, being less frequent those that focus on domiciliary care. Studies that make referen- ce to the general population and chronic patients are the most frequent, with 50 and 44% respectively. The dimen- sions of quality, the subject of study, have varied quiet a lot, with 18% referring to the continuity of care between primary care and specialised care. Dimensions such as user satisfaction, the adequacy or appropriateness of the care given, and the offer of an integral care, are rarely studied. On very rare occasions (only 10%), the works undertaken re- quired the implantation of measures geared towards an im- provement of the quality.