Article

Colon Cancer Survival Rates With the New American Joint Committee on Cancer Sixth Edition Staging

Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Ave., Rm. 72-215 CHS, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. .
CancerSpectrum Knowledge Environment (Impact Factor: 15.16). 10/2004; 96(19):1420-5. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djh275
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The recently revised American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) sixth edition cancer staging system increased the stratification within colon cancer stages II and III defined by the AJCC fifth edition system. Using nationally representative Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data, we compared survival rates associated with colon cancer stages defined according to both AJCC systems.
Using SEER data (from January 1, 1991, through December 31, 2000), we identified 119,363 patients with colon adenocarcinoma and included all patients in two analyses by stages defined by AJCC fifth and sixth edition systems. Tumors were stratified by SEER's "extent of disease" and "number of positive [lymph] nodes" coding schemes. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to compare overall and stage-specific 5-year survival. All statistical tests were two-sided.
Overall 5-year survival was 65.2%. According to stages defined by the AJCC fifth edition system, 5-year stage-specific survivals were 93.2% for stage I, 82.5% for stage II, 59.5% for stage III, and 8.1% for stage IV. According to stages defined by the AJCC sixth edition system, 5-year stage-specific survivals were 93.2% for stage I, 84.7% for stage IIa, 72.2% for stage IIb, 83.4% for stage IIIa, 64.1% for stage IIIb, 44.3% for stage IIIc, and 8.1% for stage IV. Under the sixth edition system, 5-year survival was statistically significantly better for patients with stage IIIa colon cancer (83.4%) than for patients with stage IIb disease (72.2%) (P<.001).
The AJCC sixth edition system for colon cancer stratifies survival more distinctly than the fifth edition system by providing more substages. The association of stage IIIa colon cancer with statistically significantly better survival than stage IIb in the new system may reflect current clinical practice, in which stage III patients receive chemotherapy but stage II patients generally do not.

0 Followers
 · 
92 Views
  • World Journal of Gastroenterology 01/2008; 14(25):3956. DOI:10.3748/wjg.14.3956 · 2.43 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: A subgroup of stage II colonic cancer patients are considered to be at high-risk for recurrent/metastatic disease based on 1) tumour obstruction/perforation 2) <10 lymph nodes 3) T4 lesions and 4) lymphangio-invasion. Their prognosis is regarded as comparable to stage III (T1-4N+M0) colonic cancer and it is therefore strongly advised to treat them with adjuvant chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was i) to determine the magnitude of prognostic significance of the conventional high-risk factors and ii) to determine whether the number of high-risk factors influences outcome. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 212 stage II colonic cancer patients undergoing surgery between January 2002 and December 2008. No adjuvant chemotherapy was given. Survival analyses were performed. RESULTS: 154/212 (73%) patients were considered to be high-risk patients based on conventional high-risk factors. 58 patients did not meet any high-risk factor, 125 patients met 1 high-risk factor and 29 patients met >/=2 high-risk factors. Median follow up was 40 months. Multivariate analysis identified four independent risk factors for recurrent/metastatic disease: age, obstruction, perforation and lymphangio-invasion. The three-year-DFS-rates for the low-risk group, the high-risk group with 1 high-risk factor and the high-risk group with >/=2 high-risk criteria are 90.4%, 87.6% and 75.9% respectively. Patients meeting >/=2 conventional high-risk criteria had a significantly worse three-year disease free survival (p < 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Four independent high-risk factors were identified. The number of high-risk factors does influence outcome. More attention should be given to the definition and treatment of high-risk stage II colonic cancer patients.
    European journal of surgical oncology: the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology 09/2011; 37(11):964-70. DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2011.08.135 · 2.89 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Current dogma suggests that tumor-reactive IFN-γ-producing (TH1-type) T-cells are beneficial to patient outcome; however, the clinical consequence of these responses with respect to long-term prognosis in colorectal cancer (CRC) is not understood. Here, we compared the utility of preoperative, peripheral blood-derived IFN-γ(+) T-cell responses specific to carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), 5T4, or control antigens (n = 64) with tumor staging and clinical details (n = 87) in predicting five-year outcome of CRC patients who underwent resection with curative intent. Although disease recurrence was more likely in patients with stage III tumors, the presence of preoperative, CEA-specific IFN-γ-producing T-cells identified patients at a statistically significantly greater risk of tumor recurrence following surgical resection, irrespective of tumor stage (odds ratio = 5.00, 95% confidence interval = 1.96 to 12.77, two-sided P <.001). Responses to other antigens, including 5T4, did not reflect outcome. Whilst these results initially appear surprising, they could improve prognostication and help redirect adjuvant treatments. © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press.
    JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 04/2015; 107(4). DOI:10.1093/jnci/djv001 · 15.16 Impact Factor