Article

Vasoactive intestinal peptide induces neuroendocrine differentiation in the LNCaP prostate cancer cell line through PKA, ERK, and PI3K

Unidad de Neuroendocrinología Molecular, Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Universidad de Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.
The Prostate (Impact Factor: 3.57). 05/2005; 63(1):44-55. DOI: 10.1002/pros.20173
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation in prostate cancer has been correlated with unfavorable clinical outcome. The mechanisms by which prostate cancer acquires NE properties are poorly understood, but several signaling pathways have been proposed. We have previously observed that vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) stimulates cAMP production mainly through VPAC(1) receptor, inducing NE differentiation in LNCaP cells. The aim of this study was to analyze the mechanisms involved in this process.
Reverse transcriptase (RT)-polymerase chain reaction (PCR), quantitative real-time RT-PCR, Western blotting, and immunocytochemistry were performed.
LNCaP cells produce VIP, as demonstrated by RT-PCR and immunocytochemistry. VIP induced NE differentiation of LNCaP cells at a time as short as 1 hr of treatment, and the same occurred with the expression and secretion of neuronal-specific enolase (NSE, a NE differentiation marker). These effects were faster than those exerted by serum-deprivation. VIP induced extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 and 2 (ERK1/2) phosphorylation and NE differentiation by PKA-dependent and independent pathways, since the PKA inhibitor H89 partially blocked VIP-induced NE differentiation and did not affect ERK1/2 phosphorylation. mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) appear to be also involved since the inhibitors PD98059 and wortmannin abolished ERK1/2 phosphorylation and decreased NE differentiation induced by VIP. Moreover, VIP activated Ras suggesting the involvement of a Ras-dependent pathway.
VIP behaves as autocrine/paracrine factor in LNCaP cells by inducing NE differentiation through PKA, ERK1/2, and PI3K.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Antonio Chiloeches, May 30, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
80 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Neuroendocrine (NE) cells are the minor cell populations in normal prostate epithelial compartments. During prostate carcinogenesis, the number of NE cells in malignant lesions increases, correlating with its tumorigenicity and hormone-refractory growth. It is thus proposed that cancerous NE cells promote prostate cancer (PCa) cell progression and its androgen-independent proliferation, although the origin of the cancerous NE cells is not clear. To investigate the role of cancerous NE cells in prostate carcinogenesis, we characterized three NE subclone cell lines-NE-1.3, NE-1.8 and NE-1.9, which were transdifferentiated from androgen-sensitive human PCa LNCaP cells by culturing in an androgen-depleted environment, resembling clinical androgen-ablation therapy. These subclone cells acquire many features of NE cells seen in clinical prostate carcinomas, for example exhibiting a neuronal morphology and expressing multiple NE markers, including neuron-specific enolase, chromogranin B, neurotensin, parathyroid hormone-related peptide, and to a lesser degree for chromogranin A, while lacking androgen receptor (AR) or prostate specific antigen (PSA) expression. These cells represent terminally differentiated stable cells because after 3 months of re-culturing in a medium containing androgenic activity, they still retained the NE phenotype and expressed NE markers. Despite these NE cells having a slow growth rate, they readily developed xenograft tumors. Furthermore, media conditioned by these NE cells exhibited a stimulatory effect on proliferation and PSA secretion by LNCaP cells in androgen-deprived conditions. Additionally, we found that receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase alpha plays a role in upregulating multiple NE markers and acquiring the NE phenotype. These NE cells thus represent cancerous NE cells and could serve as a useful cell model system for investigating the role of cancerous NE cells in hormone-refractory proliferation of PCa cells.
    Endocrine Related Cancer 04/2006; 13(1):151-67. DOI:10.1677/erc.1.01043 · 4.91 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a main factor promoting neovascularization (angiogenesis) of solid tumours as prostate carcinoma. Hypoxia stimulates VEGF gene expression by activating the hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1alpha). In the present study, the hypoxia-mimicking agent Ni(2+) induced vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) expression at both mRNA and peptide levels but it did not modify the expression of VIP receptors (VPAC(1), VPAC(2) and PAC(1) receptors) in androgen-dependent human LNCaP prostate cancer cells. VIP increased the mRNA levels of VPAC(1) and PAC(1) receptors whereas it decreased VPAC(2) receptor mRNA level. These features support that hypoxia up-regulation of VIP gene expression in prostatic carcinoma may lead to VIP regulation of the expression of its receptors by means of autocrine/paracrine mechanisms. Either VIP or hypoxia mimetics with Ni(2+) increased VEGF expression whereas both conditions together resulted in an additive response. It suggests two independent mechanisms for the observed pro-angiogenic activities of VIP and hypoxia. VIP did not stimulate HIF-1alpha mRNA expression but increased the translocation of HIF-1alpha from the cytosolic compartment to the cell nucleus. Moreover, VIP was unable to modify the expression of the HIF-1alpha inhibitor FIH-1 discarding the possibility of an indirect effect of VIP on HIF-1 transactivation.
    Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 05/2006; 249(1-2):116-22. DOI:10.1016/j.mce.2006.02.004 · 4.24 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In numerous recent studies attention has been focused to neuroendocrine differentiation (NED) in prostate cancer (PC). Focal NED is present in almost all PCs, but it is prominent in only 5-10% of the carcinomas. The prognostic significance of focal NED in PC is controversial, but current evidence suggests its influence on the onset and/or conversion of hormone resistant tumor phenotype. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between NED status, based only on immunohistochemical use of neuroendocrine (NE) markers, with PC grade and stage, and preoperative serum levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA). The study included the biopsy material of 73 untreated PC patients (pts.) obtained by transurethral resection (TUR) (37 pts.), and radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) (36 pts.). Two representative tissue samples (typically the block containing the largest amount of neoplasm) were selected for immunohistochemical (IMM) staining. NE cells were identified using a panel of IMM markers: chromogranin A, neuron-specific enolase, and serotonin. The level of PC exocrine differentiation was detected by monoclonal antibodies against PSA. Significant expression of NE cells was demonstrated in 26 (70.2%) pts. with PC after TUR. In this group, serum preoperative PSA values ranged from 0.1 to 9.6 ng/ml. The majority of pts. with NED had low differentiated PC with Gleason grade score (GGS) > 7, and normal PSA values below 4 ng/ml (77%), in clinical stage D (54%). Statistically significant correlation (p<0.01) of positive NED with higher stage and grade and low PSA values was established. Among the pts. with localized PC in whom RRP was performed (n=36), significant expression of NE cells was found in 15 pts. (41.7%), 8 (53.3%) in pT2 stage, and 7 (46.7%) in pT3 stage. Significant correlation between NED with preoperative PSA values and stage of PC in pts. with RRP was not found. We demonstrated the significant NED in poorly differentiated PC in patients in the advanced stage of the disease. The expression of NED in organ-confined PC did not correlate with tumor stage, but it correlated with tumor grade (GGS < or = 7).
    Urology 08/2006; 68(1):2-8. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2006.02.002 · 2.13 Impact Factor
Show more