Undiagnosed obesity: implications for undiagnosed hypertension, diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia

Department of Family Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Family medicine (Impact Factor: 1.17). 11/2004; 36(9):639-44.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Since obesity is a risk factor for hypertension, diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia, health care providers should screen obese individuals for these common diseases. It is possible that obese adults are not receiving appropriate screening for these diseases. This study's objective was to describe the prevalence of undiagnosed obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia, in a nationally representative sample of obese US adults, by patients' recollection of whether they had received such a diagnosis.
The prevalence of undiagnosed disease was obtained by identifying respondents in the 1999-2000 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) who had findings consistent with a condition but who did not report being told they had that condition by a health care provider.
The prevalence of undiagnosed obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia in currently obese US adults is 22.9%, 11.3%, 16.1%, and 37.7%, respectively. Significant predictors of undiagnosed obesity include black race and younger age. In addition, obese adults with excellent self-reported general health condition and lower body mass index are less likely to have diagnosed obesity.
Health care providers are missing valuable opportunities to address obesity and diagnose diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension in obese adults. An emphasis on screening obese individuals for these diseases is needed to improve health promotion.

Download full-text


Available from: Richelle J Koopman, Jan 10, 2014
28 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: or those who have not been in the Charleston area for several years, 2005 has marked the opening of a fabulous new span that links Charleston with Mount Pleasant. In mid July, the entire region turned out to stroll over the new bridges and celebrate their completion with a monumental fireworks display. The two dilapidated structures that had offered an aging and sometimes perilous connection between these Charleston and communities east of the Cooper River are now in the process of being torn apart, destined to be sunk somewhere off the South Carolina coast where they will serve as breeding grounds for fish. The new bridge is a beautiful structure that towers over the old rusty bridges and is visible from just about anywhere on the Charleston Peninsula. The eight-lane structure, with an additional 12 foot wide lane for walkers and bikers, makes the drive over the upper Charleston harbor a breeze. When accidents do occur (and there have been a few already), remaining drivers simply maneuver around the problem with little effect on the overall flow of traffic. What a pleasant change from the past when one disabled vehicle could easily bog down flow over the bridge for an hour or more. The new bridge to Mount Pleasant reminds me that connectivity have as much to do with efficient and safe health care as it does vehicular traffic. The cornerstone of effective patient care is the exchange of information between the patient and her or his physician. Likewise, communicating information about the patient to others on the health care team such as nurses, consulting physicians, and hospitals, is just as valuable to assuring that patients get the best and safest care possible. Yet, for much of the past eighty years our communication in health care has been on par with the old Cooper River bridges. Communication systems usually worked, but in places they were rusty, in other places a break-down could jam up the entire system, and in other places communication could be so faulty that it created dangerous conditions. Just like a new Cooper River bridge to bring commuters to Charleston more efficiently and safely, we need to figure out how we can do the same thing to improve patient communication with the health care system. In our own offices, we have been pioneers with electronic medical record systems. Family Medicine has had a computerized medical record since the early 1970's. The Department started out on a home-grown system housed on a massive mainframe computer located in two large offices in our Calhoun Street building. Faculty and residents in our office connected to this mainframe via dummy terminals situated throughout the building. Over time as computer systems shrunk in size, we were able to retire the mainframe and run our system off computers that are now linked throughout Charleston so that the same record serves our office downtown, our North Charleston office, and our East Cooper office. In addition, faculty members have tapped into the record from the nursing home or remote clinic sites on Johns Island. This connectivity assures that the latest information about patients is available to all our doctors all the time. In addition, we have been working
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Two recent developments have thrown into bold relief the importance of environmental forces in determining the prevalence of human obesity. The first is genetic studies that estimate the heritability of human obesity at no more than 33%. The second is the 33% increase in the prevalence of obesity in the USA during the past decade. The importance of the environment in influencing obesity is matched only by the extent of our ignorance of how it exerts its effects and of how we may favourably alter them. The most thoroughly studied measure of environmental influences is socioeconomic status. Among women in developed societies socioeconomic status is strongly (negatively) correlated with the prevalence of obesity: the lower the social class the more the obesity. Prospective studies have shown that this correlation reflects, in part, causation: socioeconomic status helps to determine the prevalence of obesity and thinness. Likewise, the presence of obesity helps to determine socioeconomic status. In developing societies there is also a strong relationship between socioeconomic status and obesity, but it is a positive one: the higher the socioeconomic status the more the obesity. Unfortunately, we know of few other social determinants of obesity and studies on the social determinants of this disorder are desperately needed.
    Ciba Foundation symposium 02/1996; 201:174-82; discussion 182-7, 188-93. DOI:10.1002/9780470514962.ch11
  • The Lancet 08/1997; 350(9071):142-3; author reply 144-5. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)61846-6 · 45.22 Impact Factor
Show more