A six-month followup of a randomized trial comparing the efficacy of a lateral-wedge insole with subtalar strapping and an in-shoe lateral-wedge insole in patients with varus deformity osteoarthritis of the knee

Toda Orthopedic Rheumatology Clinic, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Arthritis & Rheumatology (Impact Factor: 7.87). 10/2004; 50(10):3129-36. DOI: 10.1002/art.20569
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To assess the effect of a lateral-wedge insole with elastic strapping of the subtalar joint on the femorotibial angle in patients with varus deformity of the knee.
The efficacy of a wedged insole with subtalar straps and that of a traditional wedged insole shoe insert were compared. Sixty-six female outpatients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) were randomized (according to birth date) to be treated with either the strapped or the traditional inserted insole. Standing radiographs with unilateral insole use were used to analyze the femorotibial angles for each patient. In both groups, the baseline and 6-month visual analog scale (VAS) scores for subjective knee pain and the Lequesne index scores for knee OA were compared.
The 61 patients who completed the 6-month study were evaluated. At baseline, there was no significant difference in the femorotibial angle (P = 0.66) and the VAS score (P = 0.75) between the 2 groups. At the 6-month assessment, the 29 subjects wearing the subtalar-strapped insole demonstrated a significantly decreased femorotibial angle (P < 0.0001) and significantly improved VAS scores (P = 0.001) and Lequesne index scores (P = 0.033) compared with their baseline assessments. These significant differences were not observed in the 32 subjects assigned to the traditional shoe-inserted wedged insole.
These results suggest that an insole with a subtalar strap maintained the valgus correction of the femorotibial angle in patients with varus knee OA for 6 months, indicating longer-term clinical improvement with the strapped insert compared with the traditional insert.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Lateral wedged insoles are a common treatment in individuals with medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis of the knee joint. One concern has been the potential for increased foot and ankle pain due to increased eversion. The purpose of this study was to assess the biomechanical effectiveness of a typical lateral wedged insole and a combined insole with a lateral wedge and off-the-shelf anti-pronatory device in shoes while walking. A cross-over randomized design was used where each insole was worn by fifteen healthy subjects while three-dimensional motion data were collected in three different conditions: (1) control condition (with standard shoes), (2) with an insole with a lateral wedge and additional off-the-shelf anti-pronatory support (supporting), and (3) with an insole with a lateral wedge with no additional support (unsupported) in the standard shoes. The unsupported insole significantly increased the amount of ankle/subtalar joint complex eversion than the other experimental conditions, with the supporting insole reducing the ankle/subtalar joint complex eversion, and was found to be more comfortable. Both the supporting and unsupported lateral wedged insoles significantly reduced knee loading (external knee adduction moment reduction 8.5% and 9.1%, respectively), the knee adduction angular impulse. This new design of lateral wedge may offer increased adherence in future osteoarthritis population studies while offering reductions in joint loading.
    Human movement science 08/2013; 32(4):596-604. DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2012.12.012 · 2.03 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background:Several conservative treatments for medial knee osteoarthritis such as knee orthosis and laterally wedged insoles have been shown to reduce the load in the medial knee compartment. However, those treatments also present limitations such as patient compliance and inconsistent results regarding the treatment success.Objective:To analyze the effect of an ankle-foot orthosis on the knee adduction moment and knee joint alignment in the frontal plane in subjects with knee varus alignment.Study design:Controlled laboratory study, repeated measurements.Methods:In total, 14 healthy subjects with knee varus alignment were analyzed in five different conditions: without orthotic, with laterally wedged insoles, and with an ankle-foot orthosis in three different adjustments. Three-dimensional kinetic and kinematic data were collected during gait analysis.Results:Significant decreases in knee adduction moment, knee lever arm, and joint alignment in the frontal plane were observed with the ankle-foot orthosis in all three different adjustments. No significant differences could be found in any parameter while using the laterally wedged insoles.Conclusion:The ankle-foot orthosis was effective in reducing the knee adduction moment. The decreases in this parameter seem to be achieved by changing the knee joint alignment and thereby reducing the knee lever arm in the frontal plane.Clinical relevanceThis study presents a novel approach for reducing the load in the medial knee compartment, which could be developed as a new treatment option for patients with medial knee osteoarthritis.
    Prosthetics & Orthotics International 12/2013; 38(6). DOI:10.1177/0309364613513297 · 1.07 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract This study was conducted to assess the symptomatic effects of the insole with an elevation of 12 mm composed of urethane (urethane insole) or of sponge rubber (rubber insole) with subtalar strapping in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee (knee OA). The setting was an outpatient clinic. Eighty-four patients with knee OA were prospectively randomized, and evaluated and treated with the urethane or rubber insole for 4 weeks. Randomization was performed according to birth date and each participant was categorized into the urethane group or the rubber group. The percentage of remission of Lequesne index of severity for knee OA was compared between urethane and rubber insole groups at the conclusion of the study. Participants were asked to report adverse effects of use of the respective insoles. The percentage of remission was significantly improved in the urethane insole group (n = 42) compared with the rubber insole group (n = 42) (P = 0.001). Adverse effects were more common in the rubber insole group (17 out of 42, 40.5%) than in the urethane insole group (8 out of 42, 19.0%), and this was statistically significant (P = 0.028). The inserted insole in combination with subtalar strapping had a more natural form-fit to the sole than the insole insert alone. In our study of the subtalar strapping insole, an insole composed of urethane, was more comfortable than that of rubber sponge.
    Modern Rheumatology 12/2004; 14(6):459-465. DOI:10.3109/s10165-004-0347-9 · 2.21 Impact Factor