Locking Compression Plate Loosening and Plate Breakage

Surgical Department, Kantonspital Chur, Switzerland.
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma (Impact Factor: 1.8). 10/2004; 18(8):571-7. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200409000-00016
Source: PubMed


The Locking Compression Plate (LCP) system offers a number of advantages in fracture fixation combining angular stability through the use of locking screws with traditional fixation techniques. This makes the implant particularly suitable for use in poor bone stock and complex joint fractures, especially in the epimetaphyseal area. However, the system is complex, requiring careful attention to biomechanical principles, and a number of potential pitfalls need to be considered. These pitfalls are illustrated in the 4 cases described herein, in which treatment was unsuccessful due to implant breakage or loosening. In each case, treatment failure could be attributed to the choice of an inappropriate plate and/or fixation technique, rather than to the features of the Locking Compression Plate system itself. Such experiences highlight the importance of detailed understanding of the biomechanical principles of plate fixation as well as careful preoperative planning for the successful use of the Locking Compression Plate system.

Download full-text


Available from: Reto Hansjörg Babst, Sep 23, 2015
1 Follower
51 Reads
  • Source
    • "Although a preliminary trial established an insertion torque of 3 Nm for 4.5 mm cortical screws, a large number of cortical screws caused stripping of the thread in the soft bone of the distal metaphysis and epiphysis before the pre-set value was reached. This discrepancy is believed to mainly reflect the relative weakness of calf bones [17] and to a much lesser extent the differences in the structures of the femoral bones among individual calves. An insertion torque greater than 3 Nm is necessary to achieve adequate stability and to prevent movement between the components of an osteosynthesis [18,19]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background To compare the biomechanical in-vitro characteristics of limited-contact dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP) and locking compression plate (LCP) constructs in an osteotomy gap model of femoral fracture in neonatal calves. Pairs of intact femurs from 10 calves that had died for reasons unrelated to the study were tested. A 7-hole LC-DCP with six 4.5 mm cortical screws was used in one femur and a 7-hole LCP with four 5.0 mm locking and two 4.5 mm cortical screws was used in the corresponding femur. The constructs were tested to failure by cyclic compression at a speed of 2 mm/s within six increasing force levels. Results The bone-thread interface was stripped in 21 of 80 cortical screws (26.3%) before a pre-set insertion torque of 3 Nm was achieved. Only 3 corresponding intact pairs of constructs could be statistically compared for relative structural stiffness, actuator excursion and width of the osteotomy gap. Relative structural stiffness was significantly greater, actuator excursion and width of the osteotomy gap were significantly smaller in the LCP constructs. While failure occurred by loosening of the screws in the LC-DCP constructs, locking constructs failed by cutting large holes in the soft distal metaphyseal bone. Conclusions An insertion torque sufficient to provide adequate stability in femurs of newborn calves could not be achieved reliably with 4.5 mm cortical screws. Another limiting factor for both constructs was the weak cancellous bone of the distal fracture fragment. LCP constructs were significantly more resistant to compression than LC-DCP constructs.
    BMC Veterinary Research 08/2012; 8(1):139. DOI:10.1186/1746-6148-8-139 · 1.78 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Several plate designs with different configurations of locking and non-locking screws have been used in the management of these fractures, however there have been a number of reported failures, particularly of locking plates [6] [7] [8] [9] which suggest that fractures have failed to heal. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A variety of plate designs have been implemented for treatment of periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) fixation. Controversy, however, exists with regard to optimum fixation methods using these plates. A clinical case of a PFF fixation (Vancouver type C) was studied where a rigid locking plate fixation was compared with a more flexible non-locking approach. A parametric computational model was developed in order to understand the underlying biomechanics between these two fixations. The model was used to estimate the overall stiffness and fracture movement of the two implemented methods. Further, the differing aspects of plate design and application were incrementally changed in four different models. The clinical case showed that a rigid fixation using a 4.5 mm titanium locking plate with a short bridging length did not promote healing and ultimately failed. In contrast, a flexible fixation using 5.6 mm stainless steel non-locking plate with a larger bridging length promoted healing. The computational results highlighted that changing the bridging length made a more substantial difference to the stiffness and fracture movement than varying other parameters. Further the computational model predicted the failure zone on the locking plate. In summary, rigid fracture fixation in the case of PFF can suppress the fracture movement to a degree that prevents healing and may ultimately fail. The computational approach demonstrated the potential of this technique to compare the stiffness and fracture movement of different fixation constructs in order to determine the optimum fixation method for PFF.
    Medical Engineering & Physics 12/2011; 34(8):1041-8. DOI:10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.11.007 · 1.83 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Unfortunately, diaphyseal fixation failure occurs even with bicortical fixation (Sommer et al., 2004; Vallier et al., 2006). Vallier et al. (2006) reported four cases of screw breakage at the screwplate interface in 46 distal femur fractures treated with the locking condylar plate (Synthes, Paoli, PA). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Elevation of a locking plate over the bone surface not only supports biological fixation, but also decreases the torsional strength of the fixation construct. Biplanar fixation by means of a staggered screw hole arrangement may combat this decreased torsional strength caused by plate elevation. This biomechanical study evaluated the effect of biplanar fixation on the torsional strength of locking plate fixation in the femoral diaphysis. Custom titanium plates were manufactured with either a linear or staggered hole pattern to evaluate planar and biplanar fixation, respectively. Fixation strength under torsional loading was evaluated in surrogates of the femoral diaphysis representative of osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic bone. Furthermore, fixation strength was determined for plate fixation with unicortical or bicortical locking screws. Five specimens per configuration were loaded to failure in torsion to determine their strength, stiffness, and failure mode. In osteoporotic bone, biplanar fixation was 32% stronger (P=0.01) than planar fixation when unicortical screws were used and 9% stronger (P=0.02) when bicortical screws were used. In non-osteoporotic bone, biplanar fixation was 55% stronger (P<0.001) than planar fixation when unicortical screws were used and 42% (P<0.001) stronger when bicortical screws were used. A biplanar screw configuration improves the torsional strength of diaphyseal plate fixation relative to a planar configuration in both osteoporotic and normal bone. With biplanar fixation, unicortical screws provide the same fixation strength as bicortical screws in non-osteoporotic bone.
    Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) 06/2011; 26(5):484-90. DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.12.005 · 1.97 Impact Factor
Show more