Experience-dependent plasticity for attention to threat: Behavioral and neurophysiological evidence in humans.

National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Biological Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 10.26). 11/2004; 56(8):607-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.07.012
Source: PubMed


Biased attention to threat represents a key feature of anxiety disorders. This bias is altered by therapeutic or stressful experiences, suggesting that the bias is plastic. Charting on-line behavioral and neurophysiological changes in attention bias may generate insights on the nature of such plasticity. We used an attention-orientation task with threat cues to examine how healthy individuals alter their response over time to such cues. In Experiments 1 through 3, we established that healthy individuals demonstrate an increased attention bias away from threat over time. For Experiment 3, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to determine the neural bases for this phenomenon. Gradually increasing attention bias away from threat is associated with increased activation in the occipitotemporal cortex. Examination of plasticity of attention bias with individuals at risk for anxiety disorders may reveal how threatening stimuli come to be categorized differently in this population over time.

Download full-text


Available from: Eric E Nelson,
  • Source
    • "Taken together, results suggest that the ABM procedure may facilitate recruitment of both automatic and more elaborated/controlled cognitive functions during the dot probe task. This interpretation of the ERP findings is bolstered by recent fMRI studies demonstrating that lateral prefrontal cortical areas (Browning, Holmes, Murphy, Goodwin, & Harmer, 2010) and temporal occipital areas (Monk et al., 2004) mediate the modification of attention biases. It remains unclear, however, what cognitive processes might mediate the modification of attention biases in normative, non-clinical samples. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Anxiety is characterized by exaggerated attention to threat. Several studies suggest that this threat bias plays a causal role in the development and maintenance of anxiety disorders. Furthermore, although the threat bias can be reduced in anxious individuals and induced in non-anxious individual, the attentional mechanisms underlying these changes remain unclear. To address this issue, 49 non-anxious adults were randomly assigned to either attentional training toward or training away from threat using a modified version of the dot probe task. Behavioral measures of attentional biases were also generated pre- and post-training using the dot probe task. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were generated to threat and non-threat face pairs and probes during pre- and post-training assessments. Effects of training on behavioral measures of the threat bias were significant, but only for those participants showing pre-training biases. Attention training also influenced early spatial attention, as measured by post-training P1 amplitudes to cues. Results illustrate the importance of taking pre-training attention biases in non-anxious individuals into account when evaluating the effects of attention training and tracking physiological changes in attention following training.
    Brain and Cognition 11/2012; 78(1):63-73. DOI:10.1016/j.bandc.2011.10.007 · 2.48 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Similarly, human patients with amygdala lesions demonstrate impaired skin conductance responses while passively viewing emotional images (Glascher & Adolphs, 2003) as well as impaired detection of threat (Anderson & Phelps, 2001). Amygdala activation during fMRI correlates with attentional biases towards threat among anxious populations (Monk et al., 2004; van den Heuvel et al., 2005), further suggesting a role of the amygdala in determining cognitive indicators of fear. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The construct of emotion regulation has been increasingly investigated in the last decade, and this work has important implications for advancing anxiety disorder theory. This paper reviews research demonstrating that: 1) emotion (i.e., fear and anxiety) and emotion regulation are distinct, non-redundant, constructs that can be differentiated at the conceptual, behavioral, and neural levels of analysis; 2) emotion regulation can augment or diminish fear, depending on the emotion regulation strategy employed; and 3) measures of emotion regulation explain incremental variance in anxiety disorder symptoms above and beyond the variance explained by measures of emotional reactivity. The authors propose a model by which emotion regulation may function in the etiology of anxiety disorders. The paper concludes with suggestions for future research.
    Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 03/2010; 32(1):68-82. DOI:10.1007/s10862-009-9161-1 · 1.55 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The first study in adults did not find evidence of an attention bias in research participants, but it did reveal greater temporal–parietal and occipito–parietal cortex engagement in contrasts involving fearful relative to neutral faces (Pourtois et al., 2006). Data from the second adult study suggested that healthy subjects implicitly learn to avoid threats without changing activation in fear-related circuitry (Monk et al., 2004). Two dot-probe studies examined adolescents, one using an unmasked face presentation (Monk et al., 2006) and the other using a masked face presentation (Monk et al., 2008). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The ability of positive and negative facial signals to influence attention orienting is crucial to social functioning. Given the dramatic developmental change in neural architecture supporting social function, positive and negative facial cues may influence attention orienting differently in relatively young or old individuals. However, virtually no research examines such age-related differences in the neural circuitry supporting attention orienting to emotional faces. We examined age-related correlations in attention-orienting biases to positive and negative face emotions in a healthy sample (N=37; 9-40 years old) using functional magnetic resonance imaging and a dot-probe task. The dot-probe task in an fMRI setting yields both behavioral and neural indices of attention biases towards or away from an emotional cue (happy or angry face). In the full sample, angry-face attention bias scores did not correlate with age, and age did not correlate with brain activation to angry faces. However, age did positively correlate with attention bias towards happy faces; age also negatively correlated with left cuneus and left caudate activation to a happy bias fMRI contrast. Secondary analyses suggested age-related changes in attention bias to happy faces. The tendency in younger children to direct attention away from happy faces (relative to neutral faces) was diminished in the older age groups, in tandem with increasing neural deactivation. Implications for future work on developmental changes in attention-emotion processing are discussed.
    Brain research 08/2009; 1292:61-70. DOI:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.07.045 · 2.84 Impact Factor
Show more