Changing physician prescribing patterns through problem-based learning: an interactive, teleconference case-based education program and review of problem-based learning.
ABSTRACT Although asthma guidelines have recommended the use of anti-inflammatory controller medications since 1991, studies have consistently shown widespread failure to follow the guidelines. Major barriers include lack of knowledge and the inability to operationalize knowledge. Improved continuing medical education methods should result in more effective learning by physicians and other health care professionals, leading to better adherence to guidelines, resulting in better outcomes.
To evaluate the effectiveness of an interactive, case-based, educational intervention, also known as problem-based learning, using a series of interactive, case-based teleconferences.
A series of interactive, case-based teleconferences was completed with 20 primary care physicians. Each case involved a child aged 16 months to 12 years with asthma. A 12-month analysis of physician prescribing patterns was conducted.
Program acceptance by the 20 physicians was uniformly positive. Significant improvement was noted, with an overall increase in controller use. Review of prescription data showed an increase in inhaled corticosteroid use from an average of 2.54 to 7.76 refills per month for the 6 months after the intervention (P < .001).
After participating in a unique educational intervention-problem-based learning using interactive, case-based teleconferences-the prescribing patterns of physicians were altered significantly toward better adherence to asthma guidelines, as demonstrated by an increased use of anti-inflammatory controller medications (inhaled corticosteroids and leukotriene antagonists).
SourceAvailable from: lib.umd.edu
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:Health care provider adherence to asthma guidelines is poor. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of interventions to improve health care providers' adherence to asthma guidelines on health care process and clinical outcomes.METHODS:Data sources included Medline, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Educational Resources Information Center, PsycINFO, and Research and Development Resource Base in Continuing Medical Education up to July 2012. Paired investigators independently assessed study eligibility. Investigators abstracted data sequentially and independently graded the evidence.RESULTS:Sixty-eight eligible studies were classified by intervention: decision support, organizational change, feedback and audit, clinical pharmacy support, education only, quality improvement/pay-for-performance, multicomponent, and information only. Half were randomized trials (n = 35). There was moderate evidence for increased prescriptions of controller medications for decision support, feedback and audit, and clinical pharmacy support and low-grade evidence for organizational change and multicomponent interventions. Moderate evidence supports the use of decision support and clinical pharmacy interventions to increase provision of patient self-education/asthma action plans. Moderate evidence supports use of decision support tools to reduce emergency department visits, and low-grade evidence suggests there is no benefit for this outcome with organizational change, education only, and quality improvement/pay-for-performance.CONCLUSIONS:Decision support tools, feedback and audit, and clinical pharmacy support were most likely to improve provider adherence to asthma guidelines, as measured through health care process outcomes. There is a need to evaluate health care provider-targeted interventions with standardized outcomes.PEDIATRICS 08/2013; 132(3). DOI:10.1542/peds.2013-0779 · 5.30 Impact Factor