Out-of-office blood pressure in children and adolescents: Disparate findings by using home or ambulatory monitoring

Aghia Sophia Children’s Hospital, Athínai, Attica, Greece
American Journal of Hypertension (Impact Factor: 3.4). 11/2004; 17(10):869-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2004.05.015
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The validity of home blood pressure (HBP) measurements in children has not been evaluated, although in clinical practice such measurements are being used. This study compares HBP, with clinic (CBP) and daytime ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) in children and adolescents.
Fifty-five children and adolescents aged 6 to 18 years were evaluated with CBP (three visits), HBP (6 days), and daytime ABP. Mean age was 12.3 +/- 2.9 (SD) years, 33 boys. According to the Task Force CBP criteria, 26 were hypertensives, 6 had high-normal BP (hypertensive group), and 23 were normotensives (normotensive group).
In the hypertensive group, CBP was 130.8 +/- 7.6/72.5 +/- 8.1 mm Hg (systolic/diastolic), HBP 118.9 +/- 6.3/73.7 +/- 6.7, and ABP 130.8 +/- 8.1/75.5 +/- 8.3. In the normotensive group, CBP was 112.8 +/- 8/63.1 +/- 6.3, HBP 106.7 +/- 8.4/67.2 +/- 5.2, and ABP 123.9 +/- 7.2/72 +/- 4.3. Strong correlations (P < .001) were observed between CBP-HBP (r = 0.73/0.57, systolic/diastolic), CBP-ABP (r = 0.59/0.49), and HBP-ABP (r = 0.72/0.66). In normotensive subjects, ABP was higher than both CBP and HBP for systolic and diastolic BP (P < .001). Furthermore, systolic HBP was lower than CBP (P < .01), whereas the opposite was true for diastolic BP (P < .05). In hypertensive subjects systolic HBP was lower than both CBP and ABP (P < .001), whereas CBP did not differ from ABP. For diastolic BP no differences were found among measurement methods.
These data suggest that, in contrast to adults in whom HBP is close to the levels of daytime ABP, in children and adolescents HBP appears to be significantly lower than daytime ABP. Until more data become available, caution is needed in the interpretation of HBP in children and adolescents.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Am J Hypertens (2005) 18, 44A–44A; doi:10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.03.121 P-103: Office and out-of-office blood pressure in normotensive adolescents and young adults with type-1 diabetes George Stergiou1, Christina Alamara1, Constantinos Stefanidis1 and Adriani Vazeou11Hypertension Center, Third Department of Medicine, Sotiria Hospital, University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Department of Nephrology, P. & A. Kyriakou Children's Hospital, Athens, Greece; First Department of Pediatrics, P. & A. Kyriakou Children's Hospital, Athens, Greece.
    American Journal of Hypertension 04/2005; DOI:10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.03.121 · 3.40 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The burden of hypertension has become increasingly prevalent in children. Hypertension that begins in childhood can carry on into adulthood, therefore early detection, accurate diagnosis and effective therapy of high blood pressure may improve long-term outcomes of children and adolescents. As far as pediatric hypertension is concerned, doubts still persist about the right instruments, modalities and standards of reference that should be used in routine practice. Due to the dynamic process of growth and development, many physiological parameters undergo intensive change with age. Therefore, in children, the definition of hypertension can not rely on a single blood pressure level but should be based on age- and height-specific percentiles. In this review, we introduce the nephrologist to the correct definition of high blood pressure in children. Moreover, we specifically address the main characteristics of different modalities for blood pressure measurement in children, focusing on practical aspects. The latest international guidelines and appropriate standards of reference for office, ambulatory and home blood pressure data collection are presented. As clinicians are being faced with a greater number of children with hypertension, they should be aware of these peculiarities.
    Journal of nephrology 01/2013; 26(6). DOI:10.5301/jn.5000244 · 2.00 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: To evaluate the reproducibility of blood pressure measured at home (HBP) in comparison with ambulatory (ABP) and clinic blood pressure (CBP) in children and adolescents. Participants and methods: Individuals aged 8-17 years who had been referred for elevated CBP were included. CBP was measured at two visits, HBP on 5 days and ABP for 24 h. A second session including all the above measurements was performed after 8 weeks. The reproducibility of CBP (second visit of each session), HBP (average of days 2-5 of each session) and ABP (average 24-h, awake and asleep) was quantified using test-retest correlations coefficients (r) and the standard deviation of differences (SDD) between repeated measurements. Results: Sixteen individuals were included [mean age 13.3±2.9 (SD)] years, range 8-17, nine boys]. According to Task Force CBP criteria, eight were classified as hypertensives, three as high normal and five as normotensives. The reproducibility of HBP (systolic/diastolic r, 0.74/0.82, SDD 7.0/4.3) was superior to that of CBP (r, 0.63/0.80, SDD 10.4/6.3). However, ABP appeared to provide the most reproducible values (r, 0.87/0.84, SDD 5.5/4.3 for 24-h ABP; r, 0.85/0.76, SDD 5.9/5.0 for awake; r, 0.76/0.79, SDD 7.0/5.0 for asleep ABP). Aspects of the diurnal ABP variation were poorly reproducible (r, 0.62/0.14, SDD 6.8/5.5 for awake-asleep ABP difference; r, 0.55/0.26, SDD 0.07/0.11 for awake : asleep ratio). Conclusion: These data suggest that in children and adolescents home blood pressure measurements are more reproducible than clinic measurements. However, 24-h ambulatory monitoring appears to provide the most reproducible blood pressure values.
    Blood Pressure Monitoring 05/2005; 10(3):143-147. DOI:10.1097/00126097-200506000-00005 · 1.18 Impact Factor