Article

Exercise for people with peripheral neuropathy.

Physiotherapy Division, GKT School of Biomedical Sciences, Kings College London, Shepherds House, Guy's Campus, London Bridge, London, UK, SE1 1UL.
Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online) (Impact Factor: 5.7). 02/2004; DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003904.pub2
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Peripheral neuropathies are a wide range of diseases affecting the peripheral nerves. Demyelination or axonal degeneration gives rise to a variety of symptoms including reduced or altered sensation, pain, muscle weakness and fatigue. Secondary disability arises and this may result in adjustments to psychological and social function. Exercise therapy, with a view to developing strength and stamina, forms part of the treatment for people with peripheral neuropathy, particularly in the later stages of recovery from acute neuropathy and in chronic neuropathies.
The primary objective was to examine the effect of exercise therapy on functional ability in the treatment of people with peripheral neuropathy. In addition, secondary outcomes of muscle strength, endurance, broader measures of health and well being, as well as unfavourable outcomes were examined.
We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group register (July 2002 and updated February 2004) and MEDLINE (from January 1966 to June 2004), EMBASE (from January 1980 to June 2004), CINAHL (from January 1982 to July 2002) and LILACS (from January 1982 to July 2002) electronic databases. Bibliographies of all selected randomised controlled trials were checked and authors contacted to identify additional published or unpublished data.
Any randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trial comparing the effect of exercise therapy with no exercise therapy or drugs or an alternative non-drug treatment on functional ability (or disability) in people with peripheral neuropathy at least eight weeks after randomisation was included.
Two reviewers independently selected eligible studies, rated the methodological quality and extracted data.
Only one trial fully met the inclusion criteria. An additional two trials assessed outcomes less than eight weeks after randomisation and were also included. Methodological quality was poor for several criteria in each study. Data used in the three studies could not be pooled due to heterogeneity of diagnostic groups and outcome measures. The results of the included trials failed to show any effect of strengthening and endurance exercise programmes on functional ability in people with peripheral neuropathy. However, there is some evidence that strengthening exercise programmes were moderately effective in increasing the strength of tested muscles.
There is inadequate evidence to evaluate the effect of exercise on functional ability in people with peripheral neuropathy. The results suggest that progressive resisted exercise may improve muscle strength in affected muscles.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
190 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Shoulder pain and dysfunction after neck dissection may result from injury to the accessory nerve. The effect of early physical therapy in the form of intensive scapular strengthening exercises is unknown.MethodsA total of 59 neck dissection participants were prospectively recruited for this study. Participants were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (n = 32), consisting of progressive scapular strengthening exercises for 12 weeks, or the control group (n = 29). Blinded assessment occurred at baseline, and at 3, 6, and 12 months.ResultsThree-month data were collected on 52 participants/53 shoulders. Per-protocol analysis demonstrated that the intervention group had statistically significantly higher active shoulder abduction at 3 months compared to the control group (+26.6°; 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.28–45.95; p = .007).Conclusion The intervention is a favorable treatment for maximizing shoulder abduction in the short term. The effect of the intervention compared to usual care is uncertain in the longer term. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2014
    Head & Neck 07/2014; · 2.83 Impact Factor
  • Source
    2011 edited by BÄK, KBV, AWMF, 11/2012; Ärztliches Zentrum für Qualität in der Medizin ÄZQ, Berlin.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite the great regenerative ability of the peripheral nervous system (PNS), traumatic peripheral nerve damage often causes severe chronic disability. Rehabilitation following PNS trauma usually employs therapeutic exercise in an attempt to reanimate the target organs and stimulate functional recovery. Over the past years, important neurobiological determinants of PNS regeneration and successful end-organ reinnervation were unveiled. Such knowledge provides cues for designing novel strategies for treating and rehabilitating traumatic PNS damage. Physical exercise, by means of treadmill or wheel running, is neuroprotective and neuroregenerative. Research conducted on rodents demonstrates that endurance exercise modulates several of the cellular and molecular responses to peripheral nerve injury and by doing so it stimulates nerve regeneration and functional recovery following experimental PNS injury. Treadmill running increases the number of regenerating neurons, the rate of axonal growth, and the extent of muscle reinnervation following peripheral nerve injury. Furthermore, treadmill running has the ability to increase the release of neurotrophins and growth factors in the spinal cord, the injured nerve, and reinnervating muscles. Treadmill running also seems to prevent the development of neuropathic pain and allodynia as a result of peripheral nerve damage. In addition, physical exercise, even if performed for a short period of time, exerts positive conditioning effects in neuroregeneration capacity, improving the acute response to peripheral nerve insults. Some of these effects can also be obtained with passive exercise or manual stimulation. In humans, however, evidence demonstrating a positive effect of exercise on nerve regeneration is at best poor.
    International Review of Neurobiology 01/2013; 109C:125-149. · 2.46 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
7 Downloads
Available from
Aug 13, 2014