Article

The Effects of the Fast Track Program on Serious Problem Outcomes at the End of Elementary School

Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, PA, USA.
Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology (Impact Factor: 1.92). 01/2005; 33(4):650-61. DOI: 10.1207/s15374424jccp3304_1
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study examines the effects of the Fast Track program, which is a multicomponent, intensive intervention for children with early-onset conduct problems and continues from 1st grade through high school. Prior research has shown that Fast Track produces small positive effect sizes on children's social and behavioral outcomes at the end of 1st and 3rd grades in comparison to control children. This study addresses the important question of whether this intervention reduces cases of serious problems that can occur during the 4th- and 5th-grade years. Fast Track did have a significant but modest influence on children's rates of social competence and social cognition problems, problems with involvement with deviant peers, and conduct problems in the home and community, compared to children in the control condition. There was no evidence of intervention impact on children's serious problems in the school setting at Grades 4 and 5. This evaluation indicates that Fast Track has continued to influence certain key areas of children's adjustment throughout the elementary school years, reducing children's likelihood of emerging as cases with problems in their social, peer, or home functioning. The stage is set to examine potential prevention effects on these youths' serious antisocial behaviors during adolescence.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Mark T Greenberg, Jul 30, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
108 Views
  • Source
    • "Results of a randomized trial involving nearly 3,300 students demonstrate that the program can improve aggression and prosocial behavior among boys (Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group). Previous research (Bierman et al., 2004) has shown that an earlier version of the Fast Track program resulted in less self-reported substance use among fourth-and fifth-grade students involved in the program as compared to control students. Another integrative approach is the Positive Action program (Flay & Allred, 2010; Flay, Allred, & Ordway, 2001). "
    Encyclopedia of Primary Prevention and Health Promotion, 2nd; Vol. 2 edited by T.P. Gullotta and M. Bloom, 10/2014: chapter Substances: Misuse during childhood: pages 950-964; Springer.
  • Source
    • "Prevention scientists have successfully developed evidence - based programs in a variety of domains including substance abuse , violence , obesity , and conduct disorder ( Bierman et al . , 2004 ; Greenberg et al . 2001 ; O ' Connell et al . , 2009 ) . Some substantive areas are more developed than others , and the level of efficacy and effectiveness evidence can vary greatly . Other areas may have only one or two ' promising programs ' that have yet to undergo full randomized controlled trials . To maximize the value of al"
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In response to growing interest in economic analyses of prevention efforts, a diverse group of prevention researchers, economists, and policy analysts convened a scientific panel, on "Research Priorities in Economic Analysis of Prevention" at the 19th annual conference of the Society for Prevention Research. The panel articulated four priorities that, if followed in future research, would make economic analyses of prevention efforts easier to compare and more relevant to policymakers and community stakeholders. These priorities are: (1) increased standardization of evaluation methods, (2) improved economic valuation of common prevention outcomes, (3) expanded efforts to maximize evaluation generalizability and impact as well as (4) enhanced transparency and communicability of economic evaluations. In this paper, we define three types of economic analyses in prevention, provide context and rationale for these four priorities as well as related sub-priorities, and discuss the challenges inherent in meeting them.
    Prevention Science 08/2013; 15(6). DOI:10.1007/s11121-013-0429-z · 2.63 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Das Spektrum reicht von multimodalen, lernpsychologisch orientierten Gruppenprogrammen (z. B. van Manen, Prins & Emmelkamp, 2004), Kombinationen von Kinderpsychotherapie mit Jugendhilfemaßnahmen (Nitkowski, Petermann, Büttner, Krause-Leipoldt & Petermann, 2009; Rücker, Petermann, Büttner & Petermann, 2009) bis hin zur Frühintervention bei delinquenten Kindern (Ristow et al., 2009) sowie Anwendung von Gewaltpräventionsmaßnahmen in Schulen (Bierman et al., 2004 "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Zusammenfassung. Ziel dieser Studie war es, die Wirksamkeit des "Trainings mit aggressiven Kindern" im Rahmen einer psycho-therapeutischen Hochschulambulanz zu untersuchen. 22 aggressive Kinder (19 Jungen, 3 Mädchen) zwischen sechs und zwölf Jahren (M 9;8 Jahre, SD 1.85), die die Diagnosekriterien der Störungen des Sozialverhaltens nach ICD-10 erfüllten, wurden von ihren Eltern und Lehrern vor Beginn und nach Abschluss des Trainings eingeschätzt. Im Prätest-Posttest-Vergleich ließen sich deutliche Besserungen in den externalisierenden Störungen mit der Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) belegen. Anhand des Strengths and Difficulties Ques-tionnaire (SDQ) wurde eine Verringerung in den Verhaltensauffälligkeiten, der Gesamtproblembelastung und auch in der hyperaktiven Symptomatik nachgewiesen. Die Lehrereinschätzungen, die sich auf eine reduzierte Stichprobe von 16 Kindern bezogen, bestätigten nur in der Teacher's Report Form (TRF) eine Abnahme von aggressivem Verhalten. Weder Eltern noch Lehrkräfte gaben eine Verbesserung des prosozialen Verhaltens an. Insgesamt bestätigen die Ergebnisse die Wirksamkeit des Trainings primär in der Verminderung ag-gressiven Verhaltens. Schlüsselwörter: aggressives Verhalten, Störung des Sozialverhaltens, kognitiv-verhaltenstherapeutisches Trainingsprogramm, Effek-tivitätsstudie, Kinderpsychotherapie Effectiveness of training with aggressive children in the setting of a university's outpatient psychotherapy department Abstract. The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of a training program for aggressive children (Training with Aggressive Children; Petermann & Petermann, 2012a) in a university's outpatient psychotherapy department. 22 children diagnosed with conduct disorder according to ICD-10 aged between 6 and 12 years (average age of 9;8 years; SD 1.85) were rated by their parents and teachers before and directly after training. On the basis of pre-post outcome comparison of ratings the amount of externalizing symptoms measured by the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) decreased significantly. On the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) children improved on the scales conduct disorder, hyperactive behaviour, and overall problems. Teachers noted only a decline in aggressive behavior on the Teacher's Report Form. Neither parents nor teachers detected any improvement of prosocial behavior as expected. The results confirmed the effectiveness of training. Limitations of the study are discussed. Störungen des Sozialverhaltens gehören neben Depressi-on und ngsten zu den häufigsten psychischen Störungen bei Kindern und Jugendlichen (Petermann, 2005). Die Prävalenz für Störungen des Sozialverhaltens wird auf 7.6 % geschätzt, wobei die aggressive Symptomatik häufiger zutrifft im Vergleich zur dissozialen. Außerdem sind Kinder aus Familien mit niedrigem sozioökonomi-schen Status deutlich häufiger betroffen (Ravens-Sieberer, Wille, Bettge & Erhart, 2007). In der Kinder-und Ju-gendpsychiatrie gehört die aggressiv-dissoziale Sympto-matik zu den häufigsten Vorstellungsgründen (Fuchs, Bösch, Hausmann & Steiner, 2013). Aufgrund meist chronischer Verläufe und schlechter Langzeitprognose verursachen diese Störungen im Gesundheitswesen hohe Kosten und stellen eine große gesellschaftliche Heraus-forderung dar (Ewest, Reinhold, Vloet, Wenning &
    Kindheit und Entwicklung 07/2013; 22(3):174-180. DOI:10.1026/0942-5403/a000114 · 6.00 Impact Factor
Show more