Narcotrend does not adequately detect the transition between awareness and unconsciousness in surgical patients.

Department of Anesthesiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Anesthesiology (Impact Factor: 6.17). 12/2004; 101(5):1105-11. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200411000-00009
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The Narcotrend index (MonitorTechnik, Bad Bramstedt, Germany) is a dimensionless number between 0 and 100 that is calculated from the electroencephalogram and inversely correlates with depth of hypnosis. The current study evaluates the capability of the Narcotrend to separate awareness from unconsciousness at the transition between these levels.
Electroencephalographic recordings of 40 unpremedicated patients undergoing elective surgery were analyzed. Patients were randomly assigned to receive (1) sevoflurane-remifentanil (</= 0.1 microg . kg . min), (2) sevoflurane-remifentanil (>/= 0.2 microg . kg . min), (3) propofol-remifentanil (</= 0.1 microg . kg . min), or (4) propofol-remifentanil (>/= 0.2 microg . kg . min). Remifentanil and sevoflurane or propofol were given until loss of consciousness. After tracheal intubation, propofol or sevoflurane was stopped until return of consciousness and then restarted to induce loss of consciousness. After surgery, drugs were discontinued. Narcotrend values at loss and return of consciousness were compared with each other, and anesthetic groups were compared. Prediction probability was calculated from values at the last command before and at loss and return of consciousness.
At 105 of 316 analyzed time points, the Narcotrend did not calculate an index, and the closest calculated value was analyzed. No significant differences between loss and return of consciousness were found. In group 1, Narcotrend values were significantly higher than in group 3. Prediction probability was 0.501.
In these challenging data, the Narcotrend did not differentiate between awareness and unconsciousness. In addition, Narcotrend values were not independent from the anesthetic regimen.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Electroencephalography (EEG) offers utility as a surrogate monitor of anesthetic depth, potentially facilitating a “Goldilocks” anesthetic plan of “just right” patient centered dosing. Despite the proposed benefits, clinical incorporation has been slow, and there have been many conflicting results regarding the ability of EEG monitoring to improve clinical outcomes. This review summarizes features of EEG waveforms during wakefulness, sedation and general anesthesia. The literature regarding the effectiveness of processed EEG monitoring in preventing intraoperative awareness with recall is critically summarized; the strongest evidence for processed EEG monitoring is in the setting of total intravenous anesthesia. Preliminary evidence regarding the utility of processed EEG monitoring in preventing unnecessarily deep anesthesia and its hypothesized adverse effects is discussed. A provocative association has been noted between certain EEG features, such as burst suppression, and adverse early and intermediate term outcomes, such as delirium and death. However, whether such associations are causal or epiphenomenal is currently unknown. Finally, the limitations of current EEG monitors and the features of an ideal EEG monitor are described.
    02/2013; 3(1):13–18. DOI:10.1016/j.tacc.2012.12.003
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: For decades, monitoring depth of anesthesia was mainly based on unspecific effects of anesthetics, for example, blood pressure, heart rate, or drug concentrations. Today, electroencephalogram-based monitors promise a more specific assessment of the brain function. To date, most approaches were focused on a "head-to-head" comparison of either electroencephalogram- or standard parameter-based monitoring. In the current study, a multimodal indicator based on a combination of both electro encephalographic and standard anesthesia monitoring parameters is defined for quantification of "anesthesia depth." Two hundred sixty-three adult patients from six European centers undergoing surgery with general anesthesia were assigned to 1 of 10 anesthetic combinations according to standards of the enrolling hospital. The anesthesia multimodal index of consciousness was developed using a data-driven approach, which maps standard monitoring and electroencephalographic parameters into an output indicator that separates different levels of anesthesia from awake to electroencephalographic burst suppression. Obtained results were compared with either a combination of standard monitoring parameters or the electroencephalogram-based bispectral index. The anesthesia multimodal index of consciousness showed prediction probability (PK) of 0.96 (95% CI, 0.95 to 0.97) to separate different levels of anesthesia (wakefulness to burst suppression), whereas the bispectral index had significantly lower PK of 0.80 (0.76 to 0.81) at corrected threshold P value of less than 0.05. At the transition between consciousness and unconsciousness, anesthesia multimodal index of consciousness yielded a PK of 0.88 (0.85 to 0.91). A multimodal integration of both standard monitoring and electroencephalographic parameters may more precisely reflect the level of anesthesia compared with monitoring based on one of these aspects alone.
    Anesthesiology 04/2014; 120(4):819-28. DOI:10.1097/ALN.0000000000000151 · 6.17 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Appropriate monitoring of the depth of anaesthesia is crucial to prevent deleterious effects of insufficient anaesthesia on surgical patients. Since cardiovascular parameters and motor response testing may fail to display awareness during surgery, attempts are made to utilise alterations in brain activity as reliable markers of the anaesthetic state. Here we present a novel, promising approach for anaesthesia monitoring, basing on recurrence quantification analysis (RQA) of EEG recordings. This nonlinear time series analysis technique separates consciousness from unconsciousness during both remifentanil/sevoflurane and remifentanil/propofol anaesthesia with an overall prediction probability of more than 85%, when applied to spontaneous one-channel EEG activity in surgical patients.
    PLoS ONE 01/2010; 5(1):e8876. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0008876 · 3.53 Impact Factor