Hospital- and Patient-Level Characteristics and the Risk of Appendiceal Rupture and Negative Appendectomy in Children

Department of Surgery, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC 20010, USA.
JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association (Impact Factor: 30.39). 11/2004; 292(16):1977-82. DOI: 10.1001/jama.292.16.1977
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The rates of appendiceal rupture and negative appendectomy in children remain high despite efforts to reduce them. Both outcomes are used as measures of hospital quality. Little is known about the factors that influence these rates.
To investigate the association between hospital- and patient-level characteristics and the rates of appendiceal rupture and negative appendectomy in children.
Retrospective review using the Pediatric Health Information System database containing information on 24,411 appendectomies performed on children aged 5 to 17 years at 36 pediatric hospitals in the United States between 1997 and 2002.
Rates of negative appendectomy and appendiceal rupture; the odds ratio (OR) of negative appendectomy and appendiceal rupture by hospital, patient age, race, and health insurance status, and hospital fiscal year and appendectomy volume. Negative appendectomy rate was defined as the number of patients with appendectomy but without appendicitis divided by the total number of appendectomies.
The median negative appendectomy rate was 3.06% (range, 1%-12%) and the median appendiceal rupture rate was 35.08% (range, 22%-62%). The adjusted OR for appendiceal rupture was higher in Asian children (1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-2.23) and black children (1.13; 95% CI, 1.01-1.30) compared with white children. Children without health insurance and children with public insurance had increased odds of appendiceal rupture compared with children who had private health insurance (adjusted OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.22-1.53 for self-insured; adjusted OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.34-1.64 for public insurance). No correlation existed between negative appendectomy rate and race, health insurance status, or hospital appendiceal rupture rate. The negative appendectomy rate improved as the hospital appendectomy volume increased.
The rate of appendiceal rupture in school-aged children was associated with race and health insurance status and not with negative appendectomy rate and therefore is more likely to be associated with prehospitalization factors such as access to care, quality of care, and patient or physician education.

1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background The U.S. National Healthcare Disparities Report is a recent effort to measure and monitor racial and ethnic disparities in health and healthcare. The Report is a work in progress and includes few indicators specific to children. An indicator worthy of consideration is racial/ethnic differences in the rate of bad outcomes for pediatric acute appendicitis. Bad outcomes for this condition are indicative of poor access to healthcare, which is amenable to social and healthcare policy changes. Methods We analyzed the KID Inpatient Database, a nationally representative sample of pediatric hospitalization, to compare rates of appendicitis rupture between white, African American, Hispanic and Asian children. We ran weighted logistic regression models to obtain national estimates of relative odds of rupture rate for the four groups, adjusted for developmental, biological, socioeconomic, health services and hospital factors that might influence disease outcome. Results Rupture was a much more burdensome outcome than timely surgery and rupture avoidance. Rupture cases had 97% higher hospital charges and 175% longer hospital stays than non-rupture cases on average. These burdens disproportionately affected minority children, who had 24% – 38% higher odds of appendicitis rupture than white children, adjusting for age and gender. These differences were reduced, but remained significant after adjusting for other factors. Conclusion The racial/ethnic disparities in pediatric appendicitis outcome are large and are preventable with timely diagnosis and surgery for all children. Furthermore, estimating this disparity using the KID survey is a relatively straightforward process. Therefore pediatric appendicitis rupture rate is a good candidate for inclusion in the National Healthcare Disparities Report. As with most other health and healthcare disparities, efforts to reduce disparities in income, wealth and access to care will most likely improve the odds of favorable outcome for this condition as well.
    Population Health Metrics 06/2005; 3(1):4. DOI:10.1186/1478-7954-3-4 · 2.11 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article reviews the impact of the Medicaid program, including the proportion of children in America insured by Medicaid; the extent to which Medicaid-enrolled children have access to care; the use of services and the quality of care received by Medicaid enrollees, including evidence for disease reduction; and family satisfaction with the program. More than a quarter of all children in the United States were insured through public programs, primarily Medicaid, in 2002. Public insurance programs are even more critical for low-income children: 69.5% of children in families with incomes below 100% of the federal poverty level are covered by public programs. The reach of Medicaid is extensive, although substantial numbers of eligible children remain uninsured. Although Medicaid-insured children still face access barriers, particularly for certain types of specialty care, parents of children with public insurance report high levels of satisfaction with their experience with well-child care. While the study findings are mixed, several recent studies show very favorable comparisons between the experience of privately insured children and that of publicly insured children. Medicaid plays a critical role in providing health insurance coverage for children, particularly for very low-income families. Additional efforts are needed to fully enroll all eligible families and to assure full access to high-quality care.
    Current Opinion in Pediatrics 01/2006; 17(6):759-63. DOI:10.1097/01.mop.0000187189.89542.b5 · 2.74 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To identify risk factors for surgical site infection (SSI) in older people and to test a priori hypotheses regarding particular variables and SSI risk. Case-control study. Duke University Medical Center and seven community hospitals in North Carolina and Virginia. Elderly patients (> or =65) who underwent surgery between 1991 and 2002 at the study hospitals. Cases were elderly patients with SSI; controls were elderly operative patients without SSI. Infection control practitioners prospectively identified patients. Data were collected retrospectively. Case patients who developed SSI were compared with control patients who did not develop SSI. Five hundred sixty-nine SSI cases were identified, and 589 uninfected controls were selected. In multivariate analysis, independent predictors of SSI included obesity (odds ratio (OR)=1.77, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.34-2.32), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (OR=1.66, 95% CI=1.17-2.34), and a wound class classified as contaminated or dirty (OR=1.65, 95% CI=1.01-2.72). Having private insurance was associated with lower risk (OR=0.29, 95% CI=0.12-0.68). This study identified several independent predictors of SSI in older people, including comorbid conditions (COPD and obesity), perioperative variables (wound class), and socioeconomic factors (private insurance, which was associated with lower risk). The results from this study can be used to design and implement interventions for SSI prevention in high-risk older people.
    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 03/2006; 54(3):391-6. DOI:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00651.x · 4.22 Impact Factor


Available from