Effect of Reducing Interns' Work Hours on Serious Medical Errors in Intensive Care Units

Division of Sleep Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
New England Journal of Medicine (Impact Factor: 55.87). 11/2004; 351(18):1838-48. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa041406
Source: PubMed


Although sleep deprivation has been shown to impair neurobehavioral performance, few studies have measured its effects on medical errors.
We conducted a prospective, randomized study comparing the rates of serious medical errors made by interns while they were working according to a traditional schedule with extended (24 hours or more) work shifts every other shift (an "every third night" call schedule) and while they were working according to an intervention schedule that eliminated extended work shifts and reduced the number of hours worked per week. Incidents were identified by means of a multidisciplinary, four-pronged approach that included direct, continuous observation. Two physicians who were unaware of the interns' schedule assignments independently rated each incident.
During a total of 2203 patient-days involving 634 admissions, interns made 35.9 percent more serious medical errors during the traditional schedule than during the intervention schedule (136.0 vs. 100.1 per 1000 patient-days, P<0.001), including 56.6 percent more nonintercepted serious errors (P<0.001). The total rate of serious errors on the critical care units was 22.0 percent higher during the traditional schedule than during the intervention schedule (193.2 vs. 158.4 per 1000 patient-days, P<0.001). Interns made 20.8 percent more serious medication errors during the traditional schedule than during the intervention schedule (99.7 vs. 82.5 per 1000 patient-days, P=0.03). Interns also made 5.6 times as many serious diagnostic errors during the traditional schedule as during the intervention schedule (18.6 vs. 3.3 per 1000 patient-days, P<0.001).
Interns made substantially more serious medical errors when they worked frequent shifts of 24 hours or more than when they worked shorter shifts. Eliminating extended work shifts and reducing the number of hours interns work per week can reduce serious medical errors in the intensive care unit.

53 Reads
  • Source
    • "Previous studies have shown that SD destroyed hippocampal dependent learning and memory (Aleisa et al., 2011). SD is widespread in various occupations and individuals, for example stressful occupations (Landrigan et al., 2004). Sleep disorders caused by various diseases and contributes to decrease in work/school efficiency in modern societies (Leconte and Bloch, 1970; Philip and Akerstedt, 2006). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Previous studies have been shown that exercise can improve short-term spatial learning, memory and synaptic plasticity impairments in sleep deprived female rats. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of treadmill exercise on sleep deprivation (SD) induced impairment in hippocampal dependent long-term memory in female rats. Intact and ovariectomized female rats were used in the current study. Exercise protocol was 4 weeks treadmill running. Twenty four hour SD was induced by using multiple platform apparatus after learning phase. Spatial learning and long-term memory was examined by using the Morris Water Maze (MWM) test. Our results indicated that sleep deprivation impaired long term memory in the intact and ovariectomized female rats, regardless of reproductive status (p<0.05) and treadmill exercise compensated this impairment (p<0.05). In conclusion the results of the current study confirmed the negative effect of SD on cognitive functions and regular exercise seems to protect rats from these factors, however more investigations need to be done. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V.
    Behavioural processes 07/2015; 119. DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2015.06.014 · 1.57 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "There is a relationship between physician health and quality of care [1]. There are higher risks of medical errors, adverse events, and attentional failures by physicians who frequently work extended shifts [2] [3] [4]. The Institute of Medicine reported that every year between 48,000 and 98,000 deaths occur because of iatrogenic errors [4]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Physicians in Taiwan have a heavy workload and a stressful workplace, both of which may contribute to cardiovascular disease. However, the risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in physicians is not clear.This population-based cohort study used Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database. We identified 28,062 physicians as the case group and randomly selected 84,186 nonmedical staff patients as the control group.We used a conditional logistic regression to compare the AMI risk between physicians and controls. Subgroup analyses of physician specialty, age, gender, comorbidities, area, and hospital level were also done. Physicians have a higher prevalence of HTN (23.59% versus 19.06%, 𝑃 < 0.0001) and hyperlipidemia (21.36% versus 12.93%, 𝑃 < 0.0001) but a lower risk of AMI than did the controls (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.46–0.72) after adjusting for DM, HTN, hyperlipidemia, and area. Between medical specialty, age, and area subgroups, differences in the risk for having an AMI were nonsignificant. Medical center physicians had a lower risk (AOR: 0.42; 95%CI: 0.20–0.85) than did local clinic physicians. Taiwan’s physicians had higher prevalences of HTN and hyperlipidemia, but a lower risk of AMI than did the general population. Medical center physicians had a lower risk than did local clinic physicians. Physicians are not necessary healthier than the general public, but physicians, especially in medical centers, have a greater awareness of disease and greater access to medical care, which permits timely treatment and may prevent critical conditions such as AMI induced by delayed treatment.
    BioMed Research International 02/2015; 2015(Article ID 904328):6. DOI:10.1155/2015/904328 · 1.58 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "To provide care that is safe, effective and efficient, and meets the multiple needs of patients, healthcare systems are in great need of redesign (Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in America 2001). Considerable efforts and substantial resources have been invested in the past decade to prevent medical errors and improve patient safety (Bates et al. 1999; Landrigan et al. 2004; Pronovost et al. 2006); however, evidence on the effectiveness of these efforts is ambiguous and limited (Landrigan et al. 2010; Leape and Berwick 2005; Shekelle et al. 2011; Vincent et al. 2008). The 2005 report by the IOM and the National Academy of Engineering highlighted human factors and ergonomics (HFE) as a key systems engineering approach to improve healthcare work systems and processes and, therefore, quality of care and patient safety (Reid et al. 2005). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Healthcare systems need to be redesigned to provide care that is safe, effective and efficient, and meets the multiple needs of patients. This systematic review examines how human factors and ergonomics (HFE) is applied to redesign healthcare work systems and processes and improve quality and safety of care. We identified 12 projects representing 23 studies and addressing different physical, cognitive and organisational HFE issues in a variety of healthcare systems and care settings. Some evidence exists for the effectiveness of HFE-based healthcare system redesign in improving process and outcome measures of quality and safety of care. We assessed risk of bias in 16 studies reporting the impact of HFE-based healthcare system redesign and found varying quality across studies. Future research should further assess the impact of HFE on quality and safety of care, and clearly define the mechanisms by which HFE-based system redesign can improve quality and safety of care.
    Ergonomics 01/2015; 58(1):33-49. DOI:10.1080/00140139.2014.959070 · 1.56 Impact Factor
Show more


53 Reads
Available from