Relief of Pain and Anxiety in Pediatric Patients in Emergency Medical Systems

PEDIATRICS (Impact Factor: 5.47). 12/2004; 114(5):1348-56. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2004-1752
Source: PubMed


Whether a component of a disease process, the result of acute injury, or a product of a diagnostic or therapeutic procedure, pain should be relieved and stress should be decreased for pediatric patients. Control of pain and stress for children who enter into the emergency medical system, from the prehospital arena to the emergency department, is a vital component of emergency care. Any barriers that prevent appropriate and timely administration of analgesia to the child who requires emergency medical treatment should be eliminated. Although more research and innovation are needed, every opportunity should be taken to use available methods of pain control. A systematic approach to pain management and anxiolysis, including staff education and protocol development, can have a positive effect on providing comfort to children in the emergency setting.

Download full-text


Available from: William T Zempsky, Feb 11, 2014
67 Reads
  • Source
    • "Validated instruments to assess pain at different pediatric ages have been developed [3]. Pharmacological advances have enhanced the possibilities for effective and safe pain prevention and treatment, and guidelines specific for the emergency care setting are now available [25]. Yet, as this study shows, local policies and practices are constantly lagging behind results of scientific research and development of guidelines. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pain experienced by children in emergency departments (EDs) is often poorly assessed and treated. Although local protocols and strategies are important to ensure appropriate staff behaviours, few studies have focussed on pain management policies at hospital or department level. This study aimed at describing the policies and reported practices of pain assessment and treatment in a national sample of Italian pediatric EDs, and identifying the assocoated structural and organisational factors. A structured questionnaire was mailed to all the 14 Italian pediatric and maternal and child hospitals and to 5 general hospitals with separate pediatric emergency room. There were no refusals. Information collected included the frequency and mode of pain assessment, presence of written pain management protocols, use of local anaesthetic (EMLA cream) before venipuncture, and role of parents. General data on the hospital and ED were also recorded. Multiple Correspondence Analysis was used to explore the multivariable associations between the characteristics of hospitals and EDs and their pain management policies and practices. Routine pain assessment both at triage and in the emergency room was carried out only by 26% of surveyed EDs. About one third did not use algometric scales, and almost half (47.4%) did not have local protocols for pain treatment. Only 3 routinely reassessed pain after treatment, and only 2 used EMLA. All EDs allowed parents' presence and most (17, 89.9%) allowed them to stay when painful procedures were carried out. Eleven hospitals (57.9%) allowed parents to hold their child during blood sampling. Pediatric and maternal and child hospitals, those located in the North of Italy, equipped with medico-surgical-traumatological ED and short stay observation, and providing full assessment triage over 24 hours were more likely to report appropriate policies for pain management both at triage and in ER. A nurses to admissions ratio >= median was associated with better pain management at triage. Despite availability of national and international guidelines, pediatric pain management is still sub-optimal in Italian emergency departments. Multifaceted strategies including development of local policies, staff educational programs, and parental involvement in pain assessment should be carried out and periodically reinforced.
    BMC Pediatrics 09/2013; 13(1):139. DOI:10.1186/1471-2431-13-139 · 1.93 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Current options include topical, local injection, and regional anesthetics. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends the use of topical anesthestics, such as LET (4% lidocaine, 0.1% epinephrine, 0.5% tetracaine), for simple lacerations of the head, neck, and extremities, or trunk <5 cm in length [11]. Systemic toxicity can occur through excessive absorption of topical anesthetics; however, this can be minimized by avoiding mucosal membranes and large open wounds [12]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As millions of emergency department (ED) visits each year include wound care, emergency care providers must remain experts in acute wound management. The variety of acute wounds presenting to the ED challenge the physician to select the most appropriate management to facilitate healing. A complete wound history along with anatomic and specific medical considerations for each patient provides the basis of decision making for wound management. It is essential to apply an evidence-based approach and consider each wound individually in order to create the optimal conditions for wound healing. A comprehensive evidence-based approach to acute wound management is an essential skill set for any emergency physician or acute care practitioner. This review provides an overview of current evidence and addresses frequent pitfalls. A systematic review of the literature for acute wound management was performed. A structured MEDLINE search was performed regarding acute wound management including established wound care guidelines. The data obtained provided the framework for evidence-based recommendations and current best practices for wound care. Acute wound management varies based on the wound location and characteristics. No single approach can be applied to all wounds; however, a systematic approach to acute wound care integrated with current best practices provides the framework for exceptional wound management.
    International Journal of Emergency Medicine 12/2010; 3(4):399-407. DOI:10.1007/s12245-010-0217-5
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hintergrund Schmerzen bei stationär aufgenommenen Kindern werden häufig unzureichend behandelt. Bisher gab es keine Informationen zum Schmerzmanagement von Kinderkrankenhäusern in der Schweiz. Ziel der vorliegenden Studie war, den aktuellen Stand der Schmerzerfassung, -interpretation und -behandlung zu bestimmen. Studiendesign Ein Fragebogen wurde an alle pädiatrischen Krankenhäuser in der Schweiz gesendet. Ergebnisse Insgesamt antworteten 27 von 45 Einheiten (Antwortrate: 60%). Die meisten Abteilungen verwenden Schmerzerfassungstools (96%) und führten diesbezügliche Leitlinien ein (78%). Die Behandlung von Schmerzen erfolgt ebenfalls meist nach hausinterner Leitlinie (78%). Prozedurale und postoperative Schmerzen werden stets (100%) analgetisch behandelt. Bei Frühgeborenen und Kindern auf Intensivpflegestationen werden bei invasiven Eingriffen häufig Analgetika (> 87%) verwendet. Auf Intensivstationen liegen in 44% diesbezügliche Leitlinien vor. Resümee Der Nutzen eines effektiven Schmerzmanagements bei Kindern ist eindeutig belegt. Viele Ansätze zur Verbesserung werden in der Schweiz gut umgesetzt. Vor allem im internationalen Vergleich verbesserte sich das Schmerzmanagement. Es gibt aber noch Optimierungsmöglichkeiten. Beispielsweise besitzen weniger als die Hälfte aller schweizerischen Intensivstationen eine Leitlinie für die Behandlung von Schmerzen bei invasiven Eingriffen.
    Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde 09/2012; 160(9). DOI:10.1007/s00112-012-2680-y · 0.23 Impact Factor
Show more