Article

Healing of oral lichenoid lesions after replacing amalgam restorations: a systematic review.

University Dental Hospital of Manchester, England, UK.
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology (Impact Factor: 1.46). 12/2004; 98(5):553-65. DOI: 10.1016/S1079210404000216
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We sought to systematically review the literature related to oral lichenoid lesions (OLLs) and amalgam restorations.
Cohort and case-controlled studies (no randomized controlled trials or controlled clinical trials available) were reviewed with respect to inclusion criteria and data on patients with OLLs, treatment interventions, and the measurement of outcomes.
Fourteen cohort and 5 case-controlled trials met the criteria. The study population consisted of 1158 patients (27% male and 73% female; age range, 23-79 years). From 16% to 91% of patients had positive patch test results for at least 1 mercury compound. Of 1158 patients, 636 had to have their restorations replaced. The follow-up period ranged from 2 months to 9 1/2 years. Complete healing ranged from 37.5% to 100%. The greatest improvements were seen in lesions in close contact with amalgam.
Protocols must be standardized to obtain valid results. The replacement of amalgam restorations can result in the resolution or improvement of OLLs. Patch testing seems to be of limited value. The topographic relationship between an OLL and an amalgam restoration is a useful--but not conclusive--marker.

1 Follower
 · 
77 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of the study was to determine the prognosis and to evaluate the regression of lichenoid contact reactions (LCR) and oral lichen planus (OLP) after replacement of dental restorative materials suspected as causing the lesions. Forty-four referred patients with oral lesions participated in a follow-up study that was initiated an average of 6 years after the first examination at the Department of Odontology, i.e. the baseline examination. The patients underwent odontological clinical examination and answered a questionnaire with questions regarding dental health, medical and psychological health, and treatments undertaken from baseline to follow-up. After exchange of dental materials, regression of oral lesions was significantly higher among patients with LCR than with OLP. As no cases with OLP regressed after an exchange of materials, a proper diagnosis has to be made to avoid unnecessary exchanges of intact restorations on patients with OLP.
    Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 05/2014; 41(5):381-91. DOI:10.1111/joor.12151 · 1.93 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Direct immunofluorescence examination is an important technique in the diagnosis of cutaneous inflammatory disorders including lichen planus, especially in clinically and histopathological doubtful cases. Objective: To study the diagnostic utility of intensity, number, and subtypes of positive immuno-reactants found in lichen planus. Materials and Methods: A detailed analysis of clinical as well as immuno-histological features of lichen planus cases was carried out. Results: The male to female ratio was 1:1.1. The largest number of patients was in 31-50 year age group. Itching was the most common presenting symptom. Papular lesions were seen in 53% cases. Remaining had hypertrophic (6), follicular (3) and mucosal (9) variants. Clinico-pathological discrepancies were observed in 3 patients. The characteristic histopathological changes including basal cell vacuolization, band-like lymphocytic infiltrate at dermo-epidermal junction were seen in all the biopsies while Civatte bodies were detected in 29% cases. The overall positive yield of direct immunofluorescence microscopy was 55%. Immune deposits at Civatte bodies and dermo-epidermal junction were detected in 47% and 8% of cases, respectively. Immunoglobulin M was the most common immunoreactant followed by immunoglobulin G. Conclusions: There was no correlation found between the number and intensity of Civatte bodies with clinical variants of disease and also between the number of positive immunoreactants and clinical severity of the disease. The frequency, number, and arrangement of Civatte bodies in clusters in the papillary dermis as well as multiple immunoglobulins deposition at the Civatte bodies on direct immunofluorescence of skin biopsies are important features distinguishing lichen planus from other interface dermatitis.
    Indian Journal of Dermatology 05/2014; 59(3):257-61. DOI:10.4103/0019-5154.131389
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Oral lichenoid reactions are considered as a variant of Oral Lichen Planus (OLP) may be regarded as a disease by itself or as an exacerbation of an existing OLP, by the presence of medication and dental materials. The management of OLP and the Various OLLs may be different. Therefore, accurate diagnosis should be aimed at; here we are presenting a case of a white lesion in a fifty year old male patient shows histopathological features similar to with OLP. The diagnosis was made on the ground of the drug association.